Why isn’t “BJ only” a standard service?

[Modnar]

Hey everyone,

I've been thinking about the common services you see advertised, like GFE and PSE, and it got me wondering about how these "standard" offerings came to be. It seems like they've become the default expectation in the community.

This led me to a question: why don't we see a more widely offered "BJ only" service? It feels like it's a niche that isn't openly advertised, and I'm curious about why that is. Is it because there's not enough demand, or is it something else?

I think maybe the lack of a visible "BJ only" service is partly due to the perception that asking for it comes across as cheap or trying to get a discount on a full GFE session. But to me, it's not about being cheap; it's about wanting a specific, different type of service.

What are your thoughts on this? Do you think there's a market for a more explicit "BJ only" offering, or are the current service models already meeting everyone's needs? Personally, I would love to see this become an option.

 

[Fradi]

https://merb.cc/xenforo/threads/bj-only-session.245873/post-1758377

Use the search function.

 

[Modnar]

https://merb.cc/xenforo/threads/bj-only-session.245873/post-1758377

Use the search function.

Thanks for the link. I've seen that thread, but my question is less about finding specific providers and more about why "BJ only" isn't a widely advertised, standard service with its own defined rates, the same way GFE or PSE are.

 

[urquell]

Thanks for the link. I've seen that thread, but my question is less about finding specific providers and more about why "BJ only" isn't a widely advertised, standard service with its own defined rates, the same way GFE or PSE are.

probably because there's less demand for it, and it's a niche product since most people want FS. If the demand were wider then there would be more people offering it, I'm sure. People always seem to find their way to where the dollars are.

 

[Fradi]

Thanks for the link. I've seen that thread, but my question is less about finding specific providers and more about why "BJ only" isn't a widely advertised, standard service with its own defined rates, the same way GFE or PSE are.

I think it is probably a niche thing and most men are looking for more than a BJ and consider it is just one of the many acronyms they are looking for. Probably not worth it for SP when they can make more and have more clients offering GFE.
There is one lady in Ottawa that offers a “glory hole” service never understood how you could make a living from that but guess it was working for her.

 

[EagerBeaver]

It's an interesting question, because for almost 20 years it was the only service I requested and pursued, while paying the full rates. However, I have never seen a BJ only service offered, except priced as an extra at MPs. Perhaps the more practical question is what is the going rate for BJs vs FS as extras from an MP? That's probably a back channels discussion, as discussing extras in relation to specific MPs or MP girls is not allowed, although I would be curious to know from MP veterans the more general going rate for these extras.

 

[Modnar]

probably because there's less demand for it, and it's a niche product since most people want FS. If the demand were wider then there would be more people offering it, I'm sure. People always seem to find their way to where the dollars are.

That makes sense. That said, I'm still curious about the best way for a client to communicate that they're interested in such a service. I'd expect it to be a lower price than fs, but I can see why providers might get annoyed by just the question.

I think it is probably a niche thing and most men are looking for more than a BJ and consider it is just one of the many acronyms they are looking for. Probably not worth it for SP when they can make more and have more clients offering GFE.
There is one lady in Ottawa that offers a “glory hole” service never understood how you could make a living from that but guess it was working for her.

I agree that it's a niche, but I think the market might be there for another reason: comfort level. I'm sure there are providers who would be perfectly comfortable offering a BJ only service but would prefer not to offer FS. For them, it could be a way to expand their offerings and client base while staying within their personal boundaries. It seems like it could be a more appealing and less draining option for some providers.

 

[Fradi]

That makes sense. That said, I'm still curious about the best way for a client to communicate that they're interested in such a service. I'd expect it to be a lower price than fs, but I can see why providers might get annoyed by just the question.


I agree that it's a niche, but I think the market might be there for another reason: comfort level. I'm sure there are providers who would be perfectly comfortable offering a BJ only service but would prefer not to offer FS. For them, it could be a way to expand their offerings and client base while staying within their personal boundaries. It seems like it could be a more appealing and less draining option for some providers.

Who knows you could be right and perhaps some will see your post and embark on a new career.
There are probably way more guys like you who are looking for and could be satisfied with a BJ only session especially if the rates were more reasonable than for a GFE or PSE one.

 

[LeDodo]

There are some SP providing BJ only. Gotta find them though

 

[LeDodo]

On top of my head @Julia Sky and @Lunaseraphim (with an erotic massage but I guess you can skip it if you want lol) provide it.

As for your question about why it's not widespread I assume that people look at the economics and for almost the same price you can FS.

 

[Modnar]

On top of my head @Julia Sky and @Lunaseraphim (with an erotic massage but I guess you can skip it if you want lol) provide it.

As for your question about why it's not widespread I assume that people look at the economics and for almost the same price you can FS.

I agree with the economics part of it; if a provider is comfortable with FS and their goal is to maximize profit, then offering FS for almost the same price as a BJ only service is the way to go.
My argument is that a BJ only service should be viewed as its own separate offering, not just a discounted version of FS.

There's a significant leap in terms of risk/effort/commitment between a BJ and FS (almost as big as the jump from kissing to a BJ lol). For that reason, it doesn't make sense to me that they would be priced similarly.

 

[LeDodo]

I might let SP comment on that but I don't think that BJ only is a discounted version of FS. Doing BJ only for HH or H it's quite tiring lol

 

[Modnar]

I might let SP comment on that but I don't think that BJ only is a discount med version of FS. Doing BJ only for HH or H it's quite tiring lol

Haha, you're absolutely right. I wasn't suggesting a non-stop, 30-minute marathon lol

 

[LeDodo]

I agree with the economics part of it; if a provider is comfortable with FS and their goal is to maximize profit, then offering FS for almost the same price as a BJ only service is the way to go.
My argument is that a BJ only service should be viewed as its own separate offering, not just a discounted version of FS.

There's a significant leap in terms of risk/effort/commitment between a BJ and FS (almost as big as the jump from kissing to a BJ lol). For that reason, it doesn't make sense to me that they would be priced similarly.

PS: when I mentioned the economics I was referring to the client not the SP. If a client for almost the same price has FS he might prefer to choose the FS as an option and not being limited only to BJ only.
Even though BJ should be a separate offering it really depends of ones liking. Personally I would vouch for 69 only!
Maybe with some DFK, but then I fall again into the FS ... Lol

 

[Modnar]

Personally I would vouch for 69 only!
Maybe with some DFK, but then I fall again into the FS ... Lol

I wouldn't say DFK and 69 means you're falling into FS. I think there's a big jump from services like DFK, BJ, DATY, and 69 to PIV. Am I too conservative for thinking that?

 

[urquell]

Haha, you're absolutely right. I wasn't suggesting a non-stop, 30-minute marathon lol

If you find the cock worship providers then you can have exactly that, and more. An hour would be no problem. The presumption seems to be that the provider is going to be bobbing up and down like a tire pump at full speed for an hour. That's not happening and it would be super boring on top of that. Cock worshippers will use touch, speech, languid movements, teasing, slow licking and any of a variety of other different techniques on top of what might be conventionally regarded as a BJ. There can be a lot of imagination that goes into the session, and in fact that's what makes it interesting.

 

[DetectiveDavidMills]

Hmm, very confused by this thread.

Some of my sessions in 2025 ended up being orally focused. So it is very very standard

 

[LeDodo]

Hmm, very confused by this thread.

Some of my sessions in 2025 ended up being orally focused. So it is very very standard

OP meant BJ only for a session not the lack of BJ