Montreal Escorts

Young Adult Pornstars Acting Younger: Wrong???

Do you feel it is wrong for adult pornstars to portray younger girls?

  • It's just role-playing. Nothing wrong with that.

    Votes: 28 80.0%
  • I know they are adult, but I find it disturbing.

    Votes: 4 11.4%
  • Not sure.

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • People who like this are sick.

    Votes: 2 5.7%

  • Total voters
    35
  • Poll closed .

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
While the term pedophile seems to have become a catch all term for someone interested in 'underage' individuals, that is not the real meaning of the term. A true pedo has no interest in teenagers and the term really has no place in this discussion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedophilia

The term paedophilia erotica was coined in 1886 by the Viennese psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in his writing Psychopathia Sexualis gave the following characteristics:

The sexual interest is toward prepubescent youths only. This interest does not extend to the first signs of pubic hair.
The sexual interest is toward prepubescent youths only and does not include teenagers.
The sexual interest remains over time.
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,117
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
Hello all,

Make it Bacon said:
I've noticed that too... Where the porn industry has gone to teenage stories. Instead like the old days, where the porn stories were based more of husband or wife having affairs.

I miss the old porn, espically the fucking the nurse or the secretary stories:D

Yes, the look of retro films with the women who look fully grown and mature is something I like very much. Many of the scenarios you mention are available at Brazzers.com with mature beauties and incredible cougars.

Techman said:
And how many COLLEGE GIRLS have you known that were under 18? In fact, I believe that most kids in the US don't even graduate HIGH SCHOOL before the age of 18. And last time I checked...18 and 19 year olds were still considered TEENS as well as being legal.
.

10-19 said:
You're kidding, right?

10-19 said:
The issue is not whether the actresses are of legal age or not but rather the suggested age of the characters.

Age of college students in the USA: 16 to 19. Teens: 13 to 19.

No 10-19. Depending the birth date of individual young women, some may graduate at 17 years of age. But under state guidelines in nearly every state regarding age requirements, every young woman who graduates high school is 18 or very close to 18, at least late into their 17th year. Boys and girls cannot enter grade school until a very specific birth date minimum. I had to wait one more year than expected because of my birth date. So by the time they enter college 3 months after graduating high school they are almost guaranteed to be 18 years of age. In very rare cases of extremely high aptitude there are young women who make it to college in their 16th year. I know one 35 year old woman who did this. But she was very academically gifted, and the number of young women like this in college would be one in thousands. So the college label is generally a safe reference to 18 or older only.

However, you are right that this is about the suggested age of the women in the films according to the role they play. It is correct to use the term "women" because regardless of the implied fantasy these porn actresses are legal women 18 or older. And some of the women assigned to play these roles to appear as students are ridiculously cast. I have seen films with women like Shyla Stylez, who looks like the perfect middle aged cougar, posing as students.

But there is a definite strong disturbing trend to make already young looking women appear ever younger and imply they are underage. Despite knowing these women are 18 or more, it does make one recoil at the appearance of some of these girly-looking pornstars. Some of those coming from Russia and other foreign countries are very scary. I like role-playing fantasies, but in my view taking very young looking 18 year old and playing them even younger is a disturbing illusion no matter what the actual age is.

However, what is the appropriate 18 year old look? How can anyone set standards that can be measured? Should a true 18 year old (girl or boy) be denied adult rights because of youthful appearance? I have known several college-graduated people who look younger than 18 year old high school students. The situation is perplexing from both directions both ways. So are these porn fantasies just teasers that taunt social norms...or something to really be worried about?

:confused:

Merlot
 
Last edited:

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
One thing that no one has commented on are the web sites that cater to the opposite fantasy...an older female teacher or neighbor teaching a young looking male actor about sex. Dual standard here?

It reminds me of cases of real life teachers having relationships with young male students that have often been in the news. Many people here have commented in threads about these cases that they wished they had a teacher like that when they were that age in school. But I'm sure there would be outrage if it was a male teacher with a young female student.:cool:
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
10-19, you're looking for morality in PORN?? I think you're looking in the wrong place.

Is it any worse than teen slasher films that portray supposedly underage teens having sex and ending up sliced and diced as a consequence? At least porn isn't marketed to underaged teens the way those slasher movies are.

But then I forgot the general North American sense of 'morality'...slasher films are fine for teen consumption as long as they don't show a naked breast or heaven forbid, a consensual sex scene. Mad psycho killers are fine...natural sex and nudity are the devil's work.:rolleyes:

If I had kids, I would rather they watch porn than films like the Saw series. Now that's real pornography.
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
Merlot said:
Hello Techman,

Exactly. Though this is no defense of course, it's amazing that in society a young guy hooking up with an older woman is a "stud", while a young girl is a victim.

pfffssssst,

Merlot

But of course. Didn't you know that all young girls are angels and would never willingly partake in such a dastardly affair with a male teacher. ;)

And we definitely can't blame the parents who buy their little angels Hello Kitty panties when they are 4, t-shirts with sexy slogans when they are 8 and thongs, high heels and mini-skirts when they are 13.

Society has done such a great job sexualizing young girls that I'm stunned that anyone is actually surprised that porn is focusing on the same things. Porn reflects society's desires. It doesn't create them.

But hey, I'm just a guy that wishes his sexy female 9th grade English teacher had been ahead of her time and had sex with me. :p
 

Porter

Member
Mar 31, 2005
366
0
16
My stance on this issue comes from my rejection of the notion that the depiction of young girls having sex incites paedophiles to commit crimes, and therefore the material itself is "bad". I believe the concern of the state should be limited to ascertaining the informed and legal consent of the actual girl involved. Where no girl is involved - erotic writing, poetry, cartoons, drawing and paintings (provided the artist used his imagination and did not have an underage model posing), I would not cry foul.

Well we could apply that logic to the unrelenting violence found in most action flicks, were criminality is rampant. These genres can incite the pre desposed criminal to act..

The yielding term is fact or fiction. Clearly an 18 year old porn start who portrays a 14 year old is a work of fiction.

However the real issue is that there is a market for these types of fiction. And that is were we clearly fall off the cliff. This is a taboo subject that needs to be clearly talked about in open forums and not with an air of guilt.

Pedophilia has been around a long long time, and not too too long ago, marriages of 13 and 14 year olds were happening and State sanctioned!!!!

Today, underage sex is prolific and gaining grounds. The more we try to bury it, the worse it will get. Its time to shed light on this problem.
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,117
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
Techman said:
But of course. Didn't you know that all young girls are angels and would never willingly partake in such a dastardly affair with a male teacher. ;)

And we definitely can't blame the parents who buy their little angels Hello Kitty panties when they are 4, t-shirts with sexy slogans when they are 8 and thongs, high heels and mini-skirts when they are 13.

Society has done such a great job sexualizing young girls that I'm stunned that anyone is actually surprised that porn is focusing on the same things. Porn reflects society's desires. It doesn't create them.

But hey, I'm just a guy that wishes his sexy female 9th grade English teacher had been ahead of her time and had sex with me. :p

Hello Techman,

Excellent point! When I see girls walking around with huge type face logos right across their asses it's obvious business has focused on any sexuality in younger and younger teenage girls for profit to such an extent that porn seems to be slow in exploiting the implications of changing social norms. Again, this is no excuse, just fact.

disgraceful,

Merlot
 
Last edited:

Agrippa

C o n s u l
Aug 22, 2006
583
0
0
www.merb.ca
metoo4 said:
?????????

I would have put only one "?" but the forum requires at least 10 characters per post...
It's a picture of Chris Hansen, host of To Catch a Predator.
Wikipedia: To Catch a Predator is a reality television show that features a series of hidden camera investigations by the television news-magazine Dateline NBC devoted to the subject of identifying and detaining those who contact people below the age of consent (or individuals whom they believe to be such) over the Internet for sexual liaisons. Men are lured to meet with a decoy under the pretense of sexual contact.​
What baffles me is the caption's grammar!
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
Agrippa said:
It's a picture of Chris Hansen, host of To Catch a Predator.

Wikipedia: To Catch a Predator is a reality television show that features a series of hidden camera investigations by the television news-magazine Dateline NBC devoted to the subject of identifying and detaining those who contact people below the age of consent (or individuals whom they believe to be such) over the Internet for sexual liaisons. Men are lured to meet with a decoy under the pretense of sexual contact.​
What baffles me is the caption's grammar!

Ah, yes! To Catch a Predator: that wonderful example of entrapment television! It was like walking up to a crack addict and offering him a rock and then filming the cops busting him for possession. :cool:

How would anyone here like it if CTV news set up prostitution stings the same way, video taping clients and showing the video on TV before you were even allowed a day in court?

Yes, child predators need to be caught but it is not the business of a television network to be doing the job. Tabloid journalism at it's worst.
 

master_bates

Active Member
May 23, 2005
2,020
3
38
Techman said:
How would anyone here like it if CTV news set up prostitution stings the same way, video taping clients and showing the video on TV before you were even allowed a day in court?

You cant compare pedophiles to johns

CTV has done dateline type episodes for internet predators in canada just

not here in quebec it was done in ontario
 

Techman

The Grim Reaper
Dec 23, 2004
4,199
0
0
master_bates said:
You cant compare pedophiles to johns

And you can't compare them to people who watch porn either, but it seems that people in this thread can't seem to stop doing that. :rolleyes:
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts