Montreal Escorts

Paul McCartney Carpool Karaoke

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,104
947
113
Casablanca
If there are any Beatle fans out there, and you missed it this week, 23 minutes of pure joy
.

:thumb: :thumb: :thumb: Merci!
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,245
2,552
113
U.S.A.
Visit site

Jack T. Colton

New Member
May 12, 2011
35
0
0
Sounds like he is looking for publicity for his new releases. A quick boost in popularity does not hurt, the kids of today do not know who he is.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,245
2,552
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
Sounds like he is looking for publicity for his new releases. A quick boost in popularity does not hurt, the kids of today do not know who he is.

The last passably decent album Paul McCartney put out was in the 1980s. There can be no doubt that he is using this to pump up sales of Egypt Station.
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
Sounds like he is looking for publicity for his new releases. A quick boost in popularity does not hurt, the kids of today do not know who he is.


I'm shocked! Shocked to find that artists appear on TV to promote their new project!
9 million views in two days on youtube. I think possibly some of these viewers may be "kids".
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
The last passably decent album Paul McCartney put out was in the 1980s. There can be no doubt that he is using this to pump up sales of Egypt Station.

Flaming Pie in 1997 was McCartney's last acknowledged top notch album. Nominated for a Grammy album of the year; hit #2 on Billboards album charts; sold around 3 million copies.
 

Kawasaki

Member
May 9, 2011
46
12
8
I'm shocked! Shocked to find that artists appear on TV to promote their new project!
9 million views in two days on youtube. I think possibly some of these viewers may be "kids".

I think that would be the point, to get everyone and anyone to take notice. Kids or gramps, alike.
 

Meat Missile

New Member
Jan 17, 2011
16
0
0
Being an entertainer is like being on drugs, even if you step away from it many get the urge for that audience high.
 

Sol Tee Nutz

Well-Known Member
Apr 29, 2012
7,694
1,546
113
Look behind you.
Sounds like he is looking for publicity for his new releases. A quick boost in popularity does not hurt, the kids of today do not know who he is.

The kids of today have no musical taste ( IMO ), most is synthesized, no musical instruments, someone scratching a record, psy trance or that new mumble shit. What people listen to now will not be heard in 4 years probably 2.
Good stuff... IMO

https://youtu.be/ZzTX9NFBJWo
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
Sol - Nice rendition of Zeppelin classic.

A few years ago I read about a songwriting factory out in California that generates pop songs for the Miley Cyrus/Demi Lovato/ Katy Perry/ Ariana Grande crowd.
That's why they all sound the same. Someone writes a melody; someone writes a beat: someone writes lyrics. Then they mix and match everything together to create a song. One time Katy Perry released a song the same week as another artist that had the same melody but different lyrics. Someone got their signals crossed and mixed the same melody by one person with two different lyrics from two different people.
 

sambuca

Active Member
Sep 9, 2015
837
2
38
I think what you described GaryH is most pop music over the last fifty odd years.
 

Meta not Meta

Active Member
Dec 26, 2016
604
42
28
Even longer ... the whole idea of "The Hit Factory," etc. That's why Dylan and The Beatles were so revolutionary ....
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
Meta you are so right. Beatles, Dylan, the Who, Stones, Zeppelin etc. had an artistic vision. They didn't want to repeat themselves. They didn't follow trends, they set trends. The blandness of the hit factory before their arrival has returned. Forget creativity. I remember a few years ago the songwriter Linda Perry complained that Lady Gaga wanted to record one of Perry's songs but demanded songwriter credit on the song before she would record it. ( Even though Gaga contributed nothing to the creation of the song.) If your a singer today why spend time being creative if someone else will do it and you can still take credit.

BTW - Paul McCartney in Montreal September 20!
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,245
2,552
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
The Beatles music evolved significantly over the 7 years they were together. Also later in the Beatles tenure, George Harrison became a major songwriting contributor with “Here Comes The Sun”, and “Something”, which are two of the better songs the Beatles made in their final years. Most of the main hits are primarily Lennon or primarily McCartney, with the very notable exception of “A Day In the Life”, in which Lennon and McCartney wrote and sang separate parts of that very notable song.

One of my all time favorite McCartney songs is “Uncle Albert and Admiral Halsey”, released shortly after the Beatles broke up. It’s some of his best guitar work, along with “Maybe I Am Amazed.”

Although I acknowledge McCartney’s tremendous artistry and contribution to music before and after the Beatles, I feel as though Lennon’s artistry was on a different level. His songs are more profound and mystical. McCarthey was good at writing somewhat silly love songs. Lennon wrote some much deeper shit which was also more interesting musically in many cases. Of course Mccartney did throw in some major classics like “Yesterday” and “Hey Jude.” Great songs - no doubt. But to me “I Am The Walrus” and “Strawberry Fields Forever” by Lennon are so unusual, so distinctive, so brilliant. These songs are examples of why Lennon was really one of a kind, and why all the other Beatles viewed him as their main man, and why he was the main man and leader of the Beatles. He was the glue.
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
EagerBeaver, i love your analysis and it is so true. Though, the way I look at the Beatles is this way - there never would have been a Beatles without John Lennon, but we wouldn't be talking about them in the terms we do today without Paul McCartney. At the end of 1966 the Beatles were starting to drift apart. John was off acting in a movie, George was increasingly interested in Eastern music. Paul started to take control of the group then. Sgt. Pepper, Magical Mystery Tour, the White Album, Let It Be sessions, Abbey Road were mainly Paul driven sessions trying to keep the group together. I think in the last three years Paul was the glue that kept the group together. But in the first 4 years, the group followed John's lead. I personally think that they were all great.
 

sambuca

Active Member
Sep 9, 2015
837
2
38
I remember a few years ago the songwriter Linda Perry complained that Lady Gaga wanted to record one of Perry's songs but demanded songwriter credit on the song before she would record it.

ASCAP should ban this practice. It's a bit like someone richer and more powerful stealing part of your soul.
 

EagerBeaver

Veteran of Misadventures
Jul 11, 2003
19,245
2,552
113
U.S.A.
Visit site
GaryH,

I think that after John Lennon met Yoko Ono is when McCartney seized control of the group to try and save the group. I think when John met Yoko his mind began to drift away from success of the group to bigger issues in the world. He started becoming much more political, and also (unlike other Beatles) very enamored with life in the USA and New York City in particular. This manifested with his solo music after the breakup as well, with songs like “War Is Over”, his Christmas classic made with children of Harlem. Lennon commanded far more respect among his fellow musicians than any Beatle and this led to his infamous collaborations with David Bowie and Elton John and others. I love Elton John’s remake of another Lennon classic, Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds. At some point Lennon seemed to lose interest and full commitment to the Beatles and that is when it all ended. I believe if he had not been shot there would have potentially been a reunion concert and it would have happened on Lennon’s terms somewhere in NYC which was his home for the 11 years of his life after he left the Beatles. Reportedly he loved NYC and had favorite restaurants that he frequented. In an interview he gave with Dick Cavett early 1970s he said he would never go back to live in the UK, and he never did.
 

GaryH

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2014
385
285
63
I love the singer songwriter concept. I love that an artist gives a piece of themselves through their songs. I have memories of visiting Liverpool - Penny Lane and Strawberry Fields - and when I hear those songs, i am reminded of my visit there.

I think of visiting London and being at the Waterloo Underground Station while someone was playing the Kinks' "Waterloo Sunset" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N_MqfF0WBsU

I think of walking down boulevard Saint-Laurent last Saturday, seeing the mural of Leonard Cohen painted on a wall as I proceeded down to the port of Montreal listening to "Suzanne" on my IPOD.

Songwriters who paint pictures and memories with words.
 

sambuca

Active Member
Sep 9, 2015
837
2
38
I believe if he had not been shot there would have potentially been a reunion concert and it would have happened on Lennon’s terms somewhere in NYC which was his home for the 11 years of his life after he left the Beatles.

Or the Beatles could be on their fourth or fifth reunion tour selling out stadiums on five continents.
 
Toronto Escorts