Lance Armstrong finished
I have always been believing he has been doing doping. It does not make common sense that all his past team mates admit to doing doping but he does not. I do not having to rely on Lance's drug doping testing results to wonder this: Why would all the guilty dopers help to make the "clean" guy champion? This does not make common sense.
"I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in winning my seven Tours since 1999," he said. "The toll this has taken on my family and my work for our foundation and on me leads me to where I am today - finished with this nonsense."
That he said above is not a believable excuse to not continue to fighting if he is truly innocent. I do not feeling sorry for Lance. He is a guilty doper and finally got caught!
I hope I make my point to everybody understandable. English is my third language to speaking. Sorry.
We was and he will remain the best cyclist ever on the tour the France. Still today all those professionals cyclists use dugs.We will have to wait a least one or two years for the truth.
Veteran of Misadventures
What I got out of the interview is that he admitted doping, but did not feel he was cheating because everyone else was doing the same and the playing field was level. To a certain extent, he is probably right. There were probably a few guys who were not doping, but they would not have won the Tour de France. Some other doper would have.
At least he had the ball to fess up;-)
Which is why the T D F officials cannot give the titles to anyone else s they can't find anyone clean. Had the officials taken as many tests on the rest of th competitors as they did Lance there would be as many othres up there with him having to confess. OK the Guy is no Saint but has done a lot to raise money for cancer victims so he is not all bad.