Etiquette for asking SPs if you can review them

[rosedelacourt]

i agree

if acronyms are missing from a review, i cant be bothered to read it

the review doesnt need to be a retelling of everything that went on but if the review cant confirm that the basic GFE elements were present, i dont see the point

emotional connection, feelings of intimacy, etc., are all highly subjective descriptors of a session. i aint interested in reading about how a member keeps falling in love with a sp or sees her as the 8th wonder of the world

if reviews start obfuscating whether services like BBBJ were offered, in no time we'll be back to CBJ being the norm like it was before review boards were around. not interested

I'm sorry but everything in a session is subjective. Yes certain ''services'' are to be expected but if the guy isn't respectful or nice, he's not getting the full experience. Our ''performance'' depends on clients' manners. The fact that ''BBBJ'' isn't explicitly written doesn't mean it's CBJ. But if you are shaved, clean and a gentleman you have way way better chances of getting it. Yes this is a service industry, but it's still intimacy. It's human connection. People tend to forget we have hearts and souls. (both clients towards providers and sometimes providers towards clients).

 

[Flyingby]

After she has had her 10th orgasm during the hour. Ask her if you can review...
if you did not give her at least 10. Than it would be impolite because she probably did not have as good a time as you did
Also in the review. You must talk about how amazing your performance was and how big you john is. If it is smaller than 8 inches. She probably did not have a good time and you must not review.

 

[Rinzler]

I'm sorry but everything in a session is subjective.

if dfk was provided or not in a session isnt subjective, its factual

if bbbj was provided or not in a session isnt subjective, its factual as well

if it turns out a chap didnt receive these services in a session because he behaved like an ass but still comes here to whine about not getting said services, the agency or the sp herself can come here to set the record straight and everybody can make up their minds about it

its not something new, it has happened before

 

[hungry101]

if reviews start obfuscating whether services like BBBJ were offered, in no time we'll be back to CBJ being the norm like it was before review boards were around. not interested

This is my concern.

Yes, girls would love us all to pay deposits and probably love us to pay 500$/ session minimum in advance and write no details in a review except something like I really like this girl and you should really see her, blah blah... LOL. I worry this would lead to services degrading over time and the CBJ once again becomes the norm. Also, I never avoided a girl because of one bad review. It is more likely that I look at reviews for patterns.

 

[The Nature Boy]

if reviews start obfuscating whether services like BBBJ were offered, in no time we'll be back to CBJ being the norm like it was before review boards were around. not interested

what the hell is Obfuscating?

 

[rollingstone]

Confirmation of basic GFE elements has to be there, especially if she is advertising as GFE. I'd even accept something like "all GFE services were delivered with enthusiasm and passion".

What is beyond GFE should be a bit more discrete, especially if she is not known for it. This can include something extremely sensitive to hygiene like rimming (i think this should never be mentioned in a review). Also if she spent 6 hours with you on a 3 hour appointment, I don't think that should be mentioned (saying she is not a clock watcher should suffice).

Having said that, I kind of get Rose's point. As gentlemen, we know a review shows us what is possible to enjoy with a woman, and that it is our duty to make sure she can be at her best with us. However, there are many out there who approach it with a sense of entitlement and have a loose relationship with hygiene and good manners.

 

[rosedelacourt]

if dfk was provided or not in a session isnt subjective, its factual

if bbbj was provided or not in a session isnt subjective, its factual as well

if it turns out a chap didnt receive these services in a session because he behaved like an ass but still comes here to whine about not getting said services, the agency or the sp herself can come here to set the record straight and everybody can make up their minds about it

its not something new, it has happened before

Yet when we answer our own review threads and such it isn't well perceived at all. Of course the services received are factual. But let's say I really like a client and offer him greek at no extra fee. Or let him CIM. Then he writes it down in the review and every client comes to see me expecting this. I've seen guys not clean at all whine about me refusing BBBJ, saying that other girls did that to him while he was in the same ''state''. He could very well give me a bad review and it would be his word against mine...

 

[Rinzler]

what the hell is Obfuscating?

Let me google that for you

 

[Rinzler]

He could very well give me a bad review and it would be his word against mine...

and all your many, many, past positive reviews would then establish the greater credibility of your response to his bad review, explaining why said service was denied

 

[rosedelacourt]

and all your many, many, past positive reviews would then establish the greater credibility of your response to his bad review, explaining why said service was denied

Of course, but I still feel that unless the service is bad, clients should respect the wishes of the provider out of respect for what they want. Some girls love acronyms, some don't

 

[Rinzler]

^well just say it straight up either during your prior communications or when you meet a client for a first time that you prefer if a review is written afterwards, to leave acronyms out of it

and if the client doesnt abide by your wishes then it is your prerogative to not see him again if he wants to have another session and let him know why

 

[rosedelacourt]

^well just say it straight up either during your prior communications or when you meet a client for a first time that you prefer if a review is written afterwards, to leave acronyms out of it

and if the client doesnt abide by your wishes then it is your prerogative to not see him again if he wants to have another session and let him know why

That's exactly what I do! I'm not fighting I'm just trying to give a provider's perspective

 

[The Nature Boy]

Roses position really isn’t that obfuscatory, makes perfect sense

 

[Flyingby]

I now have a sudden urge to book rosedelacourt

 

[rosedelacourt]

I now have a sudden urge to book rosedelacourt

Love it!!!!

 

[Fradi]

That's exactly what I do! I'm not fighting I'm just trying to give a provider's perspective

You are not alone in this and your wishes should be respected, it is not that difficult to write a respectful review without any acronyms and still get your point across for others to know if you would recommend seeing her or not .

 

[Rinzler]

Roses position really isn’t that obfuscatory, makes perfect sense

rose is perfectly entitled to her view but if every sp adopts the same position, well then the reviews will become nothing less than airy-fairy stories about how clients and sps are lovingly gazing into each others' eyes during their sessions

i aint interested in reading that

a review board is only as good as the information that is widely available to all its members

if getting the real information means that we all need to send each others pms to get it then in no time who gets that information will be defacto become at the discretion of cliques and coteries

theres already another board that already pretty much functions like that, recommendations rather than reviews, and its dead

 

[rosedelacourt]

rose is perfectly entitled to her view but if every sp adopts the same position, well then the reviews will become nothing less than airy-fairy stories about how clients and sps are lovingly gazing into each others' eyes during their sessions

i aint interested in reading that

a review board is only as good as the information that is widely available to all its members

if getting the real information means that we all need to send each others pms to get it then in no time who gets that information will be defacto become at the discretion of cliques and coteries

theres already another board that already pretty much functions like that, recommendations rather than reviews, and its dead

But the goal isn't reviews that are play-by-play/spankbank material... it's to know if the provider is legit and provides an experience as advertised and promised.

 

[Fradi]

clients and sps are lovingly gazing into each others' eyes during their sessions

That is one of the best parts, We do that all the time with my ATF.
Flyingby is right after all this Rose is not to be missed.

 

[The Nature Boy]

I always thought girls wanted all the info out there, this is a completely different perspective for me...