i agree
if acronyms are missing from a review, i cant be bothered to read it
the review doesnt need to be a retelling of everything that went on but if the review cant confirm that the basic GFE elements were present, i dont see the point
emotional connection, feelings of intimacy, etc., are all highly subjective descriptors of a session. i aint interested in reading about how a member keeps falling in love with a sp or sees her as the 8th wonder of the world
if reviews start obfuscating whether services like BBBJ were offered, in no time we'll be back to CBJ being the norm like it was before review boards were around. not interested
I'm sorry but everything in a session is subjective. Yes certain ''services'' are to be expected but if the guy isn't respectful or nice, he's not getting the full experience. Our ''performance'' depends on clients' manners. The fact that ''BBBJ'' isn't explicitly written doesn't mean it's CBJ. But if you are shaved, clean and a gentleman you have way way better chances of getting it. Yes this is a service industry, but it's still intimacy. It's human connection. People tend to forget we have hearts and souls. (both clients towards providers and sometimes providers towards clients).