Open Letter: Discrimination Has No Place in This Industry

[perso]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

Let me be crystal clear: this is dehumanizing, discriminatory, and completely unacceptable.

We live in 2025 — in a city that prides itself on openness, inclusion, and care for others. For any agency, especially one that profits from providing companionship and connection, to deliberately shut the door on a whole population of people is not only cruel — it’s hypocritical.

Being disabled doesn’t make someone less deserving of touch, intimacy, or dignity. What it does mean is that they often face countless extra barriers — physical, social, emotional — just to access what many of us take for granted. And now they’re being denied again, by those who should understand the value of connection better than anyone?

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

To the community — clients, companions, and agencies alike — if you agree that people living with disabilities deserve respect, boycott Euphoria starting now. Don’t support a business that chooses exclusion over compassion. There are plenty of agencies and independents who treat all people with dignity — let’s uplift them instead.

To other agencies: do better. Make your services accessible. Educate yourselves. Build policies rooted in inclusion, not ignorance.

To everyone else: speak up. Ask hard questions. Let Euphoria know this is not okay. Let others know we expect more from this industry — and we’re done tolerating discrimination.

Because if your business is built on connection, but you can’t see the humanity in someone with a disability, then what are you really selling?

Enough is enough.


— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

Sorry about that. But this is business. I understand your frustrations. Whatever the business is, whatever the business model and etiquette, you don’t like it, you don’t go back and you move on.

 

[EagerBeaver]

Interesting thread. The client has accused Euphoria of discrimination and James has provided non-discriminatory reasons for not servicing this client. As to the distance issue, it seems like this could be resolved financially with greater compensation, although outcall escort agencies, like pizzerias and other businesses specializing in delivery, typically set geographical limits. Sometimes it's by kilometers or miles and sometimes by towns or cities.

I managed a pizza delivery business in Connecticut in my now distant youth. I would occasionally get calls from towns outside our limits and I was trained to tell the caller, "we don't deliver to [ ], but you are welcome to come in and pick up a pie". In other words pizza incall.

I realize incall probably isn't logistically possible for Handi - so it's a problem.

A more interesting issue I had was the housing project that WAS within my pizzeria's geographical set limits. This was the 1980s, and we didn't deliver there because of fear that our drivers would be robbed. A few were in fact robbed. I have no doubt that not every person who called from that housing project for pizza was a criminal. I used to feel bad telling those people they had to come in and pick up their pies, but the project was only around 2 miles from the pizzeria and none of the callers ever protested. Was it discrimination? I guess you could argue it was, in the sense that whether the housing project customer had criminal intentions or not, they had to come in and pick up their pies- pizza incall. But they would get their pizza.

Regarding the ladies not accepting the method of payment being offered by the client, that's a logistical problem on the other side for the agency, just like incall is a logistical issue for the client. The client has to be able to provide payment through the mechanisms specified by the agency. We live in the age of electronic payments and it shouldn't be difficult for any client to adapt if they have the financial means to participate in this business.

 

[FunLuver]

To the Montreal escort community,

It’s time we talk about something deeply shameful — and no, I’m not talking about kink or taboo. I’m talking about blatant discrimination against people living with disabilities.

Recently, it came to my attention that the agency Euphoria refuses to offer outcall services to clients with disabilities. No nuance. No case-by-case. Just a cold, flat-out refusal — as if being disabled disqualifies someone from intimacy, pleasure, or even basic human respect.

(…)

Shame on Euphoria.

And shame on all of us if we let this slide in silence.

(…)

— An advocate who refuses to stay silent

Advocacy also requires rallying people to one’s cause… shaming and guilt-tripping has the opposite effect.

It is clearly conveyed that there is a « flat-out refusal » at (outcall) service for the disabled… but there is rather convenient omission to mention that service has been provided multiple times over the span of a decade… not exactly what I would call « transparency ».

And just wondering on what « data » these accusations were formulated… did you have a full insight into the agency and have access to their communications to arrive at such « systemic disabled exclusion » conclusion ?

I am for fairness and compassion… for all.

Edit: Lunaseraphim resumed it well: no one is entitled to the services of SW. Their game, their rules.

 

[anatomy]

Advocacy also requires rallying people to one’s cause… shaming and guilt-tripping has the opposite effect.

It is clearly conveyed that there is a « flat-out refusal » at (outcall) service for the disabled… but there is rather convenient omission to mention that service has been provided multiple times over the span of a decade… not exactly what I would call « transparency ».

And just wondering on what « data » these accusations were formulated… did you have a full insight into the agency and have access to their communications to arrive at such « systemic disabled exclusion » conclusion ?

I am for fairness and compassion… for all.

Edit: Lunaseraphim resumed it well: no one is entitled to the services of SW. Their game, the

 

[anatomy]

This has turned into a "he said, she said" situation. It has gone beyond a philosophical discussion of right or wrong to the actual facts of the case. Each side has a diametrically opposite version of the facts i.e. how far away is his location, how he pays, what happens when he calls, etc.,etc. Whom are we to believe???

 

[LC18]

Not everyone is comfortable meeting people with disabilities and that doesn’t make them bad people.

It’s a different type of meeting and…well we don’t get trained for that? It’s normal someone prefers to pass if they’re unfamiliar with that kind of setting…

I’m sorry that it means some of you have less options when it comes to choosing the SP you’d like to book

 

[Handi]

This has turned into a "he said, she said" situation. It has gone beyond a philosophical discussion of right or wrong to the actual facts of the case. Each side has a diametrically opposite version of the facts i.e. how far away is his location, how he pays, what happens when he calls, etc.,etc. Whom are we to believe???

Thanks for your comment — and you're right that it could look like a "he said, she said" situation on the surface.

But the core of the discussion actually goes beyond me or any specific facts — it’s about how we treat vulnerability, how much transparency truly exists in this industry, and who gets heard when they speak up.

The real issue is that James and the agencies involved have stayed completely silent other than random arguments about my situation. And that silence? It speaks volumes. It confirms what too many people already feel deep down: nobody really cares.

That’s the part that hurts — and that’s exactly why this discussion matters.

 

[EagerBeaver]

The real issue is that James and the agencies involved have stayed completely silent other than random arguments about my situation. And that silence? It speaks volumes. It confirms what too many people already feel deep down: nobody really cares.

That’s the part that hurts — and that’s exactly why this discussion matters.

I am not following you here- what are "James and the agencies involved" staying silent about? I think it was mentioned that Euphoria had serviced you for many years previously. What is it they should not be staying silent about?

 

[bizoubizou]

Thanks for your comment — and you're right that it could look like a "he said, she said" situation on the surface.

But the core of the discussion actually goes beyond me or any specific facts — it’s about how we treat vulnerability, how much transparency truly exists in this industry, and who gets heard when they speak up.

The real issue is that James and the agencies involved have stayed completely silent other than random arguments about my situation. And that silence? It speaks volumes. It confirms what too many people already feel deep down: nobody really cares.

That’s the part that hurts — and that’s exactly why this discussion matters.

James explained to you why he doesnt wantyour business anymore and you still dont get it.... What do you want him to add? Whatever answer he will gave you, you will never be satisfied. Time to love on. Really.

This is Merb not a group therapy......

 

[LC18]

James explained to you why he doesnt wantyour business anymore and you still dont get it.... What do you want him to add? Whatever answer he will gave you, you will never be satisfied. Time to love on. Really.

This is Merb not a group therapy......

But also isn’t it awkward? Is OP going to beg until James says yes?

And then what? Girls are gonna go to his place against their will? That for sure will be a very exciting date…

 

[DouMan]

This all looks more and more sad seemingly based on entitlement. Let's pull back a minute and look at the bigger picture that is evolving. It tends to depict that "I pay, I want, I get".To many well based arguments the reply comes back to "ok, I'll pay more". Why not just move on to the ladies that willingly offer these specialized services and stop shaming those who don't. It's not because we throw bills on the floor that we are entitled to see anyone pick them up.

 

[anatomy]

Thanks for your comment — and you're right that it could look like a "he said, she said" situation on the surface.

But the core of the discussion actually goes beyond me or any specific facts — it’s about how we treat vulnerability, how much transparency truly exists in this industry, and who gets heard when they speak up.

The real issue is that James and the agencies involved have stayed completely silent other than random arguments about my situation. And that silence? It speaks volumes. It confirms what too many people already feel deep down: nobody really cares.

That’s the part that hurts — and that’s exactly why this discussion

"But the core of the discussion actually goes beyond me or any specific facts". The problem with that is you initiated this whole thread based on a set of "facts". Now, if they weren't true or exaggerated then it was done under false pretenses to introduce your agenda. IF, that's the case you owe James an apology.