Mirage Escort
Montreal Escorts

MTL Blue Collar Workers Threaten to Ruin Cycling World Championships with Strike

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,486
1,429
113
Casablanca
If the workers go through with their threat, it would be a big embarrassment for the city. The cycling world championships are a major global sports event which will already disrupt the normal life of the city with some road closures and detours. There will be athletes, team staff and visitors in the city from around the world. Garbage strewn streets would not be a good look for the city.

The cycling world championships were last held in Montreal in 1974, when the great Eddy Merckx won the race.


The blue-collar workers' union in Montreal has filed a seven-day strike notice, with workers expected to walk out near the end of September during the UCI 2026 Road World Championships.

The strike is scheduled to take place from Sept. 22 and 28 and could disrupt the event, which runs from Sept. 20 to 27 and will bring the world's best cyclists to Montreal.

''We have just wrapped up an intense round of negotiations and management does not seem to have a clear mandate regarding wages,'' said Nicolas De Ciccio, president of the union, the Syndicat des cols bleus regroupés de Montréal.
"The city is still offering wage increases below the inflation rate! Montreal’s blue-collar workers provide an essential service and deserve, at the very least, to be taken seriously at the bargaining table."
In a news release, the union said it was not walking away from the table and is waiting for a ''serious'' offer.
"We're not asking for the moon," continued De Ciccio.
The workers' collective agreement expired on Dec. 31, 2024. The union represents about 6,000 workers.
In mid-August, the union had already warned that if the city did not speed up negotiations, it would have "no choice" but to step up its pressure tactics, potentially leading to a "historic labour dispute" during the cycling event.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,486
1,429
113
Casablanca

...De Ciccio said the union could use pressure tactics during the championships, but said cyclists’ health and safety would not be put at risk.

“We repeat. We’ve already said it. We do not want to—and will not—endanger the health and safety of cyclists. What we want is to send a message and show that the City of Montreal, as an employer, does not respect its employees if we fail to reach a tentative agreement...”


Well, that's good to know. :rolleyes: But what about the health and safety of ordinary citizens? Hmm, we'll see.
 

Assisto

New Member
Dec 25, 2019
27
17
3
Strike all the things, esp. when it hurts the most. Collective action is the way.
Le local 301 de la ftq a émis hier un communiqué à l'effet qu'il y aurait entente de principe, qui devra être présentée aux membres avant d'être acceptée. J'ignore cependant si les journées de grève auront tout de même lieu...
 

twenty4seven

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2025
538
1,067
93
Le local 301 de la ftq a émis hier un communiqué à l'effet qu'il y aurait entente de principe, qui devra être présentée aux membres avant d'être acceptée. J'ignore cependant si les journées de grève auront tout de même lieu...
C'est formidable. L'action collective est le seul moyen pour les travailleurs d'obtenir ce qu'ils veulent.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,567
6,521
113
C'est formidable. L'action collective est le seul moyen pour les travailleurs d'obtenir ce qu'ils veulent.
Yes well often they are asking for too much which is unreasonable, a good example of this were the Canada Post workers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptRenault

twenty4seven

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2025
538
1,067
93
But they hold the public hostage like the STM workers did.
I realize they pay media outlets to report things like this with a slant but I'm still don't understand why common people take the sides of corporations and governments over striking workers, like they're the only ones holding out during negotiations. They're the ones holding the public hostage, not the unions and strikers. If their workers were happy they wouldn't be striking.

We gotta stop doing the heavy lifting for cheap CEOs and poor civic managers.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,567
6,521
113
I realize they pay media outlets to report things like this with a slant but I'm still don't understand why common people take the sides of corporations and governments over striking workers, like they're the only ones holding out during negotiations. They're the ones holding the public hostage, not the unions and strikers. If their workers were happy they wouldn't be striking.

We gotta stop doing the heavy lifting for cheap CEOs and poor civic managers.
The workers punish the civilians. They should punish the CEOs and managers. You do realize when the STM went on strike it does not affect CEOs and managers? They all got money and go by car. It is the poor and students who are penalized since they are not rich and are at the mercy of public transit. Then they got to pay a lot of money taking a taxi to get to work and school. I know they provided service during peak hours three times a day but not everyone work business hours. At one point they did not provide weekend service, what about all the people who work weekends? They had to take a taxi each time to get to and back home from work.

Can you imagine when if the government did not put the dock workers back to work? On their already great salaries they wanted more. Food would not reach store shelves prices would go up or there would be a shortage. Again CEOs and managers would not be affected much as they got the high salaries to pay for expensive food. The poor and students would be affected the most.

I do not think you see the big picture. Something to think about.
 

twenty4seven

Well-Known Member
Oct 4, 2025
538
1,067
93
I think we both see the picture, you just view it through the lens the oligarchs and powerful want you to.

Yes, when workers go on strike, ordinary people are affected more than C-suite execs, obv, but there are (at least) 2 sides to a negotiation. The workers are taking action collectively because a handful of people who make decisions are not meeting them in fair negotiations. So, are you under the impression that a bunch of mostly disconnected people from a lower income class, who all have families and bills and other responsibilities, WANT to stop working (and therefore getting paid) just to be vilified by the media and the public for their actions?

They're doing it because they feel they need to. So, who is to blame for services being out in a strike? The totality of the working class, whose needs and requests are being ignored and ridiculed by the powerful, or the small group of people holding the purse strings that are forcing them to strike?

You don't like the strikes? Pressure the decision makers to cough up the bucks. Don't take it out on the people doing the jobs you clearly desperately need them to be doing.

Something to think about.
 

CLOUD 500

Well-Known Member
Jan 10, 2005
8,567
6,521
113
I do not agree. Unionized workers are entitled. They get paid a lot more then those in the private sector. Did you read up on some of the demands of those Postal workers? Clearly they were entitled and disconnected from reality. They also choose to strike when to impacts civilians the most, last year they decided to strike in Fall when students go to work. The postal workers striked during holiday season. I am not on the side of corporations or these entitled unionized workers. I am on the side of the little guy, those working minimum wage and students because at the end they got to pay the price for their war.