Indy Companion
Montreal Escorts

2013 Official Major League Baseball Thread.

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,111
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
BOYZ!!!

JoeT knows far more than you (I bet rumps' face is RED).

Joe.t couldn't find his butt without Iggy, and vice verse.

You're so amusing...

You need a life...NOT shamelessly chasing Rumps.

Through four games, this year’s ALCS was averaging 7.2 million viewers, up 29% from Fox’s coverage a year ago (of the NLCS), which drew 5.6 million. The Tigers-Red Sox series is also pacing ahead of last year’s four-game ALCS (Tigers-New York Yankees), which finished with an average of 5.8 million on TBS.

This is what happens when a bunch of broken down slow and weak grossly overpaid has-beens in sadly outdated pinstripes gets kicked out of the playoffs. Nobody else cares about Yankees.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/18/s...-one-win-away-after-beating-sanchez.html?_r=0

DETROIT — It was a best-of-three now, the American League Championship Series, and it was supposed to only get tougher for the Boston Red Sox. The Detroit Tigers could send out Anibal Sanchez, Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander. Against them, the Red Sox had seemed helpless while their own rotation had been hit or miss.

The Red Sox had little choice but to grind and muscle their way past the Tigers, which is what they did Thursday. They knocked around Sanchez, the first of the three starters; knocked the Tigers’ catcher, Alex Avila, out of the game; hindered Prince Fielder and a hurt Miguel Cabrera; and hung on against the Tigers, 4-3, to take a three-games-to-two series lead.

“But no excuses,” said Jim Leyland, the Tigers’ manager. “Been good games, and so far they got the best of it.”

The Red Sox can close out the series Saturday in Boston, but they will have to do so against Scherzer. Of course, they fared just fine in their second game against Sanchez.


Hmmm, no sign of the angry dude today. Why am I not surprised? Public rage combined with being serially wrong...

It's called being embarrassingly EXPOSED...on both counts.

Cheers,

Merlot
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Hmmm, no sign of the angry dude today. Why am I not surprised? Public rage combined with being serially wrong can be embarrassing.

Just to show what kind of guy I am, I'm going to be extra generous this morning and leave the lad a little lesson: 1. Never predict a short series. 2. never predict a short series in a state of rage.

Two great league championship series involving the four best teams in baseball. What a treat.

HaHa, rumps, you & your buddies are SO predictable. Gloating like you made your first dollar.

I know you all were checking merb like every 15 minutes looking for me to post but I was busy today doing some important things. (Got that Merlot? See next post).

Funny thing is both the Los Angeles Dodgers and Detroit Tigers are in the same position. Both the Dodgers and Tigers are down 3-2 going away facing elimination with one loss. And Both LA and Detroit have 2 aces pitching their next 2 games. Scherzer and Verlander for the Tigers and Kershaw and Ryu for the Dodgers. It's very conceivable that the Tigers and Dodgers could be in the World Series, although both are down 3-2 going their opponents home fields.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
BOYZ!!!



Joe.t couldn't find his butt without Iggy, and vice verse.



You need a life...NOT shamelessly chasing Rumps.

A life Merlot? How many countless HOURS do you spend on here writing 10 feet long posts that No probably reads, even rumps? A LIFE? Read the post above Merlot. Besides, I haven't been posting that much here lately, Merlot, because I do have a life.

Besides, Merlot,

I have 2,602 posts and I have been a member since February 2004. Average of 22 posts per month.
You have 2,923 posts and you have been a member since November 2008. Average of 61 posts per month.
Rumps has 6,300 posts and he has been a member since January 2007. Average of 77 posts per month.

And your 2,923 posts per month, you've probably typed more words than all of the words in all of the books in the Library of Congress.

Do you want to know which of us don't have a life of us 3? It's not me.

By the way, both Joe and lggy are plenty competent. I think you meant your and rump's butts. Your statement would make more sense.

This is what happens when a bunch of broken down slow and weak grossly overpaid has-beens in sadly outdated pinstripes gets kicked out of the playoffs. Nobody else cares about Yankees.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/18/s...-one-win-away-after-beating-sanchez.html?_r=0

DETROIT — It was a best-of-three now, the American League Championship Series, and it was supposed to only get tougher for the Boston Red Sox. The Detroit Tigers could send out Anibal Sanchez, Max Scherzer and Justin Verlander. Against them, the Red Sox had seemed helpless while their own rotation had been hit or miss.

The Red Sox had little choice but to grind and muscle their way past the Tigers, which is what they did Thursday. They knocked around Sanchez, the first of the three starters; knocked the Tigers’ catcher, Alex Avila, out of the game; hindered Prince Fielder and a hurt Miguel Cabrera; and hung on against the Tigers, 4-3, to take a three-games-to-two series lead.

“But no excuses,” said Jim Leyland, the Tigers’ manager. “Been good games, and so far they got the best of it.”

The Red Sox can close out the series Saturday in Boston, but they will have to do so against Scherzer. Of course, they fared just fine in their second game against Sanchez.




It's called being embarrassingly EXPOSED...on both counts.

Cheers,

Merlot
 

lgna69xxx

New Member
Oct 3, 2008
10,414
11
0
Still the same ole hypocritical instigating and goading merlie, especially since myself nor Joe have even said anything here lately? Typical "you" but i understand as I imagine you are still sore about being snubbed 2 weeks ago, ;) it's ok, it will get easier as the sunny fall days and chilly nights go by, until it happens again this winter :wave:

Joe.t couldn't find his butt without Iggy, and vice verse.

CheersMerlot
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
And your point was what, Mr 41?

Ho hum, another day, another fluke. Magic Number down to 5.

(Careful pissing in the wind, DD. You'll only get wet...once again.)

In 5 games, the Red Sox have scored 14 runs in 5 games. That's under 3 runs a game. Very light hitting (rumps you know that term). If Scherzer and Verlander are on their games, Detroit will win.

Trivia time:

Boston played Detroit 7 times during the regular 2013 season. Who won?

Detroit 4 games to 3.

REGULAR SEASON SERIES
Tigers won 4-3
Jun 20, 2013 Red Sox 3, Tigers 4
Jun 21, 2013 Red Sox 10, Tigers 6
Jun 22, 2013 Red Sox 3, Tigers 10
Jun 23, 2013 Red Sox 5, Tigers 7
Sep 2, 2013 Tigers 3, Red Sox 0
Sep 3, 2013 Tigers 1, Red Sox 2
Sep 4, 2013 Tigers 4, Red Sox 20
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
BOYZ!!!

Joe.t couldn't find his butt without Iggy, and vice verse.

Cheers,

Merlot

Still the same ole hypocritical instigating and goading merlie, especially since myself nor Joe have even said anything here lately? Typical "you" but i understand as I imagine you are still sore about being snubbed 2 weeks ago, ;) it's ok, it will get easier as the sunny fall days and chilly nights go by, until it happens again this winter :wave:

You know lggy, this may be merlot's version of singing Kumbaya, but since he's such an angry and vengeful man, he only knows how to insult. Who do you suppose he learned this behavior from? Someone very close to him, who he visits every trip to the mecca. (hint - ;)

Plus, if Merlot and his best buddy were ever invited to Mike's party, there just may be a whole lot of trauma suffered by Mike's girls. I leave your imagination conjure up the details. :lol:
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
It's very conceivable that the Tigers and Dodgers could be in the World Series, although both are down 3-2 going their opponents home fields.
You know, child, you could give Joe.T wrong lessons. I don't think I've ever come across anybody with such a knack for getting everything wrong. 'fess up. You work at it, don't you?

Last time the Sox lost two in a row at home? May 17-18.

If Scherzer and Verlander are on their games, Detroit will win.
Scherzer and Verlander were both on their game last time out. How'd that work out?

When the Tigers were eliminated last year in the World Series, who was the losing pitcher? Max Scherzer.
When the Tigers were eliminated in 2011 in the ALCS, who was the losing pitcher, giving up 6 runs in 2.3 innings? Max Scherzer.
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
You know, child, you could give Joe.T wrong lessons. I don't think I've ever come across anybody with such a knack for getting everything wrong. 'fess up. You work at it, don't you?

Last time the Sox lost two in a row at home? May 17-18.

Rumps, aren't you tired of giving misinformation and being such a FOOL? You can't even get the right results of the dates you posted.

By the way the last time the Red Sox lost two in a row @ Home is September 17 and 18 when they played the Baltimore Orioles at Fenway that 3rd World Stadium. Here's the link:

http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/schedule/_/name/bos/seasontype/2/boston-red-sox

Tue, Sep 17 vs Baltimore L3-2 92-60 Hunter (6-4) Uehara (4-1) Johnson (46) 35,030

Wed, Sep 18 vs Baltimore L5-3 F/12 92-61 McFarland (2-1) Morales (2-2) Johnson (47) 38,540

Now on May 17 and 18th

Boston won both games at Minnesota at the days that you claimed was the last time they lost 2 in a row.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/schedule/_/name/bos/seasontype/2/half/1/boston-red-sox

Fri, May 17 @ Minnesota W3-2 F/10 25-17 Wilson (1-0) Roenicke (1-1) Uehara (1) 30,210
Sat, May 18 @ Minnesota W12-5 26-17 Breslow (1-0) Diamond (3-4) 36,967

So Old Man, aren't your tired of being constantly wrong rumps???? Don't you feel like a buffoon???

Hey Merlot, this is your idol, rumps. I'm sorry to unmask him before your very eyes. The man behind the curtain is a fake.

Scherzer and Verlander were both on their game last time out. How'd that work out?

When the Tigers were eliminated last year in the World Series, who was the losing pitcher? Max Scherzer.
When the Tigers were eliminated in 2011 in the ALCS, who was the losing pitcher, giving up 6 runs in 2.3 innings? Max Scherzer.

Why are you mentioning last year and 2011. We are in 2013, rumps. Don't you know what year it is? Let's look at both of these aces very last appearance. It's downright scary if you are a Red Sox fan:

Well, last time out, rumps, Scherzer pitched 7 innings, gave up 1 run, 2 hits and struck out 13 batters. Yes Detroit lost on Ortiz's Improbable Home Run, but Scherzer pitched a great game. Buchholz is pitching game 6. He pitched lousy in game 2, giving up 5 runs in 5 2/3 innings. Who knows how bad Clay will pitch tomorrow.

Last time out, rumps, Verlander pitched 8 innings, gave up 1 run, 4 hits and struck out 10. Yes, your team will lose if they don't score any runs, but Verlander pitched a great game. Lackey pitched well in game 3. But giving Lackey's inconsistency, although he has pitched well this season, who knows which Lackey will turn up.

Scherzer and Verlander are known aces. They have lots of experience. I think their poise will carry Detroit to victory.

Be fearful of the arms, rumps, not the beards. :lol::thumb:
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Congratulations to the St. Louis Cardinals

Los Angeles played a tough series until the end, as St. Louis won 9-0 to clinch the NL Pennant.

St. Louis vs. Detroit is going to be a great World Series. :thumb::lol:
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,111
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
BOYZ,

...snubbed 2 weeks ago,

:lol: SHILLS can't snub, especially one who has to pay for his own party to worship himself, and bait others with escorts to attend. Besides, you wreak...sir shill.

In 5 games, the Red Sox have scored 14 runs in 5 games. That's under 3 runs a game.

The Tigers have one more run than the Red Sox in the series yet are losing 3 games to 2. So much for the failed idea of who scores more runs, just as the Yanks LOST though scoring 55 runs to the Pirates 27 in 1960. Lopsided wins mean nothing if you lose more games, just ask any Yankees fan as their team has often blown out other teams many years and still FAILED 12 times out of 13 years.

Scherzer and Verlander were both on their game last time out. How'd that work out?

The Red Sox have beaten the probable Cy Young winner in Scherzer, and the hottest pitcher going into the playoff in Verlander. This after the Yankees embarrassingly got swept out of the playoffs scoring only 6 runs in 4 games (average 1.5), in 2012.

....aren't your tired of being constantly wrong...Don't you feel like a buffoon???

Detroit lost on Ortiz's Improbable Home Run,...

Scherzer and the Tigers lost on Saltalamacchia's RBI hit in the 9th...sir wrong BUFFOON! Also, it was a Grand Slam by Ortiz.

All of the league championship teams have lived on pitching in the playoffs this year, until the Cardinals most recent win. I'm not sure who I wanted to see win. I like the Dodgers more but I can't stand that bombastic ego-freak Puig. The public in many regions and the media seemed to want a Red Sox-Dodgers Series, which would have generated great coast to coast interest. Too bad.

Right now the Red Sox have done far more than anyone in Red Sox Nation or anywhere ever thought possible. It was enough for me when they made the playoffs, more than enough they won the division, and nothing in the future can be disappointing.

Cheers pals,

Merlot
 

daydreamer41

Active Member
Feb 9, 2004
2,722
2
36
NY State
Visit site
Gee, Merlot, where's your old man buddy, rumps? He must be hiding somewhere with his tail between his legs after getting whipped last night. He usually posts early in the morning. And how come you always come in here to defend him, no matter what? Does he send you in here like a good little boy to defend his decrepit honor?

BOYZ,



SHILLS can't snub, especially one who has to pay for his own party to worship himself, and bait others with escorts to attend. Besides, you wreak...sir shill.

You weren't invited, Merlot. I bet it's tugging at you.

The Tigers have one more run than the Red Sox in the series yet are losing 3 games to 2. So much for the failed idea of who scores more runs, just as the Yanks LOST though scoring 55 runs to the Pirates 27 in 1960. Lopsided wins mean nothing if you lose more games, just ask and Yankees fan as their team has often blown out other teams many years and still FAILED 12 times out of 13 years.

My point Merlot is your Red Sox aren't hitting the Tigers pitching. With Scherzer and Verlander pitching games 6 and 7, chances are the Red Sox bats will be dormant again. It gives the Tigers a good chance of coming back and winning even though Boston has the home field advantage.

When's the last time you even touched a woman DD. You were banned from a poll because you never had a required meeting that year...if any. Yet you spend your posts chasing Rumps.

Very recently, Merlot. I was on a date with a woman I don't have to pay to touch, etc. Merlot. When's the last time you dated a woman you don't have to pay, IF EVER? In your world, if you aren't writing reviews, you must be celibate.

The Red Sox have beaten the probable Cy Young winner in Scherzer, and the hottest pitcher going into the playoff in Verlnader. This after the Yankees embarrassingly got swept out of the playoffs scoring only 6 runs in 4 games (average 1.5), in 2012.

And the score was what, Merlot? 1-0. I don't call that very convincing. If Scherzer pitches like he did the first game, Detroit will win.

Scherzer and the Tigers lost on Saltalamacchia's RBI hit in the 9th...sir wrong BUFFOON! Also, it was a Grand Slam by Ortiz.

Is that the best you have, Merlot? If Ortiz didn't hit the HR, the Red Sox would have lost. Your logic is truly whacked.


Cheers pals,

Merlot[/QUOTE]
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
Gee, Merlot, where's your old man buddy, rumps? He must be hiding somewhere with his tail between his legs after getting whipped last night.
Whipped by you, who has been wrong at every turn since Opening Day? OK, I took a post from the Boston Globe and, doing a Rush Limbaugh imitation, didn't fact check it.

So how are the playoffs working out for you? Can you name one thing you haven't gotten wrong vis a vis the Red Sox? One thing?

There are three teams left standing and, not surprisingly, they're the three best teams in baseball. While anything can happen, I'd sure rather be up 3-2 and in the park where I had the best record in baseball than in Detroit's shoes with their shoddy defense.
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
One of the things that sets baseball apart from other sports is its subtlety. The Red Sox remake in 2013 is remarkable not just for the free agents signed and the return to form of some injured players, but for the way the re-tooling was spread over the entire organization. One thing that sets the Sox and Tigers apart, for example, is coaching and baserunning. This fine article by Alex Speier for WEEI talks about how the Sox superior efforts in this area are responsible for their position entering game 6 tonight.

RUNNING TO GLORY? HOW RED SOX CREATED A CHAMPIONSHIP-CALIBER BASE RUNNING CULTURE

Could it be that the winner of the American League Championship Series will have been decided in the third base coach's box? Or, perhaps, in the form of the lumbering slugger who proved the superior base runner?

The Tigers and Red Sox appear closely matched in terms of overall talent. It's hard to conclude otherwise after seeing four of the first five games of the ALCS decided by one run. That being the case, it increases the likelihood that separation between the two teams may lie in the sort of details that are often overlooked. In this case, that may well boil down to base running, one of the most pronounced areas of disparity between the two clubs.

Consider:

In Game 2, Will Middlebrooks was the lead runner in a first-and-second, two-out situation with the Red Sox trailing, 5-1. Dustin Pedroia grounded a single through the right side to Torii Hunter. With two outs, the default is typically to take an aggressive approach, send the runner and force the other team to make a play. But Sox third base coach Brian Butterfield had Middlebrooks slam on the brakes.

"When they were making the pitching change I was talking with Butter, and he said, 'Ball hit to Torii, he's been doing this for years, throwing guys out from there, so don't be surprised if I stop you.' He told me before hand he might do it," Middlebrooks recounted after. "As soon as the ball is hit, I'm trying to score of course. But I would never run through a stop sign on Butter. I trust him with everything. He studies the game more than anybody I've ever seen."

In this case, Butterfield allowed his conservative decision to be guided by a number of factors, foremost the arm strength of Hunter and the fact that holding Middlebrooks would mean bringing David Ortiz to the plate with the bases loaded.

"You try to factor in everything outside of the number of outs -- pitching matchups, guy that's in the 'pen, on-deck hitter, your next hitter, the arm strength, obviously, conditions of the field," said Butterfield. "We want to be aggressive, but sometimes it's just not there. And the guy going to Cooperstown can hit."

With Middlebrooks on third and the bases flooded, David Ortiz jumped on the first pitch from reliever Joaquin Benoit and blasted it into the Red Sox bullpen for a game-tying grand slam in an eventual 6-5 walk off victory. Without Butterfield's hold -- and Middlebrooks' awareness that it was coming -- the Sox may not have claimed a win in a game that, right now, appears to have been a pivotal one in the first five games of the series.

By contrast, in Game 5 of the ALCS, the Tigers had runners on first and second with two outs when Jhonny Peralta grounded a single to left. Detroit third base coach Tom Brookens initially waved lead runner Miguel Cabrera -- whose left leg injuries make it appear as if he's running in a swimming pool -- before changing course and trying to ask the slugger to slam on the brakes.

Too late. Cabrera blew through the late stop sign and was thrown out at home by about 15 feet.

"You're thinking you've got to score with two outs, that's the old baseball thing. But in this particular case with Miggy you've got to hold him up right away," rued Detroit manager Jim Leyland after the game. "[Brookens] was waving, and it probably stopped him a little late. With Miggy right now, you've got to stop him. And there was nothing Miggy could do, he saw him waving and Brookey held him up a little late.

"In saying that, everybody just assumes the next guy is going to get a hit. That doesn't always hold true," added Leyland. "But [Brookens] made a mistake."

Later in Game 5, in the third inning, Mike Napoli doubled, got a terrific break on a tapper just to the left of starter Anibal Sanchez to advance to third on a come backer and then got a strong read when a two-out pitch in the dirt trickled away from catcher Alex Avila to score the Sox' fourth and final run.

"You've always got to be ready for it," said Napoli. "Butter is always in my ear to be ready for a ball in the dirt. We were talking earlier about 90 feet can win you a ballgame. And that definitely helped us tonight."

On one hand, Napoli hardly seemed a candidate to create a run with his legs as much as his bat. He's slow, has a degenerative condition in his hips and is managing plantar fasciitis in his foot that makes it feel a stabbing pain when he runs. Yet the Sox were not necessarily surprised to see that it was Napoli's aggressive and intelligent gambit on the bases that led to the margin of victory.

"Mike Napoli far and away gives us the most flexibility when he's on the bases despite his speed. He's always engaged and looking to advance 90 feet. He set forth a tone that the rest of the guys have followed and the rest of the guys have caught up to his thought process," said bench coach Torey Lovullo. "He understood the importance of [the Sox' aggressive base running philosophy in the spring]. He was brought up in the Angels organization where it was preached. You could see that play out everyday. We could see that [in Game 5] -- the ball got away from the catcher, not necessarily the fastest guy but the most prepared guy and he took advantage of a situation that turned out to be the winning run. I think that's what we're all about getting accomplished here, and everyone else has bought into it."

SEEKING VALIDATION FOR A BASERUNNING CULTURE

When John Farrell became manager of the Blue Jays, and was entrusted with responsibility for the management not just of a pitching staff but also of offense, he became fascinated with the potential impact of an aggressive base running culture -- asking not just players like speedster Rajai Davis but also slugger Jose Bautista -- to look to steal a bag or take an extra base. The approach was driven by more than just a desire to claim an extra 90 feet at a time, though that, too, was significant.

It was about keeping the other team on its heels, whether forcing an opposing pitching staff to contend with the constant necessity to manage base runners rather than just the hitter or forcing a defense to constantly feel as if it must rush with every play on the field.

Farrell knew that his preference was to import the same approach to the Red Sox dugout. But before he and his staff -- most notably, Lovullo, who is in charge of the running game -- committed to it in full, they wanted to make sure that it was indeed beneficial from a bottom-line perspective, that the occasional extra out was a worthwhile toll for the impact generated by an aggressive approach on the bases.

"We went through this exercise in spring training. It was brought out to us in spring training that, whatever you were doing previously in the last two years, keep doing it, because there were a lot of situations where we benefited from being calculated aggressive," recalled Farrell. "Because of those resources, [Red Sox director of Baseball Information Solutions Tom Tippett] specifically, we have the ability to say, this is the style we want and this is what we want to do, and he has the ability to bounce off of us, OK, this is what your approach might mean in runs or increasing scoring chances by X number. All of those answer the what if question of, are we doing the right thing? Are we doing something that is a benefit rather than a detriment -- all while pushing the envelope?"

"In spring training we had several sit-downs with [Tippett] where we outlined some of our thoughts, and he outlined the importance of base running, timely base running, and how it could help and hinder [the offense]. So we became situationally aware, just a little more situationally aware of when to take chances and when not to take chances," added Lovullo. "We certainly incorporated his information. It's a good case study. It's a 10-year process that he's been following, so we of course wanted to integrate some of his thoughts to make it a little bit better."

Tippett, Lovullo recalled, allowed the Sox to re-examine such things as the presumption that the consequences of making the first out of an inning at third base were severe, whether it made sense to attempt a steal with two outs and two strikes with a top hitter at the plate so that he could lead off the next inning with a clean count if an out was made and, in an interesting prelude to the critical hold of Middlebrooks in Game 2, the value of sending a runner from second with two outs.

The general thrust of Tippett's studies?

"It's never a good time to give up an out," said Lovullo. "The old adage, don't make the first out at third base, trade an out for a run, two outs, send the guy from second base; attempt a stolen base with two outs and two strikes so the leadoff hitter can lead off the next inning with a clean count; those make a lot of sense, but they don't necessarily work all the time."

Nonetheless, there was also plenty of evidence to support an aggressive approach on the bases, to appreciate the value of an extra 90 feet not just in a vacuum but also for its resonance on other aspects of the game.

FOLLOW THE LEADERS: A PLAYER-LED PROGRAM

While it was one thing for the Red Sox coaching staff to say that they wanted to create a base running culture that mixed aggressiveness and intelligence on the bases, it was quite another to have the personnel to carry that out in a somewhat extraordinary fashion. But the fact that, in the words of Butterfield, the Sox have players who constantly "talk the game" and care about the details, about winning games with precision at the margins, had a huge impact in terms of allowing the Sox to create an attitude on the bases.

"We dropped a lot of new concepts on [the players] in spring training," said Lovullo. "They were very foreign. We spent a lot of time talking about it. For us to watch the progress that it's made and how it's gotten to this point is pretty special. We feel like it's another dynamic, another way we can go out and execute to beat teams."

There was more than just buy-in from the players. There was a genuine commitment to leadership, to embracing the concept of being an aggressive and intelligent base running team and to seeing that translate to both the way in which the club prepared for games and, ultimately, how it competed in games.

Butterfield cited three examples:

"Early on in the process, I had a one-on-one conversation with Dustin Pedroia. It was obvious that all the players gravitated towards him, and it was obvious that when he spoke, you could hear a pin drop in the room," said Butterfield. "I said, 'Pedey, how can we become a great base running team?' He didn't even hesitate. He looked at me and said, 'Whatever you need, you let me know and I'll get it taken care of in here.'

"That is so helpful to a coach or a coaching staff when your best player or players are on board and they're going to police it in the clubhouse walls to make sure we'll do it all together," continued the third-base coach. "There's going to be some things that guys don't like, that some of your veteran players don't like. We felt like if there were things they didn't like and they thought we shouldn't do them, they would tell us behind closed doors. Then, on the other things that we thought were important and they knew were important, they'd just take care of it themselves."

Backup catcher David Ross, in a team meeting, suggested that the team's veterans all needed to practice running the bases and getting reads on the ball off the bat after their first round of swings in batting practice.

"He said, 'We all need to get out there after our swings and run the bases, especially if we've got young guys, get some reads off the bat in order to become a quick, decisive base running team,' " recounted Butterfield.

Jonny Gomes also became a voice in the movement for a hard-nosed base running approach. In many ways, he's offered a pair of the signature moments in what the Sox have implemented on the bases, having set a tone for both the regular season and postseason by scoring from second on infield hits on Opening Day and then again in the first game of the playoffs against the Rays.
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
It's a fluke!
Bring on the Cards.
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
Pete Abraham said:
Prediction: The Red Sox are a better team top to bottom and have several advantages, starting with extra time off to set their pitching. The Tigers have been slogging it out with a 16-15 record since the start of September (counting the playoffs). The Red Sox show no signs of letting up. Red Sox in six games.

Is it safe to say that the Tigers pitchers were "Lights Out" yesterday and that Pete Abraham don't know shit about playoff baseball.:nod:
So how'd that work out for you, Joe?

Congratulations to the two best teams in baseball: The Boston Red Sox and the Saint Louis Cardinals. Bring it on. It should be a classic World Serious between two ancient rivals.
 

Merlot

Banned
Nov 13, 2008
4,111
0
0
Visiting Planet Earth
BOYZZZ!

My point Merlot is your Red Sox aren't hitting the Tigers pitching....chances are the Red Sox bats will be dormant again.

[video=youtube;y0L3JGv1WjA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0L3JGv1WjA[/video]

NUFF CED!!! :D :nod: :thumb: :peace: :whoo: :cool:

Congratulations to the Boston Red Sox, proving who is the better T-E-A-M. Special congratulations to that magnificent Boston bull pen, which was nearly faultless giving up only one meaningless run in the entire 6-game series.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/20/sports/baseball/victorinos-grand-slam-sends-red-sox-past-tigers-to-world-series.html?_r=0

BOSTON — In 2004, they wore their hair long and projected a goofy, irreverent manner.

Nine years later, they are bearded, bedraggled and relentless, a formula that has carried the Boston Red Sox back to the World Series.

The Red Sox are American League champions again, a title they earned with a dramatic 5-2 victory over Detroit in Game 6 of the league championship series Saturday night, mostly because of another grand slam off the Tigers’ suspect bullpen.

With Boston trailing by a run with one out in the seventh inning, Shane Victorino hit a blast off relief pitcher Jose Veras for the second grand slam of his postseason career. And for the fourth time in their storied history, and the second time in 10 seasons, the Red Sox will meet the St. Louis Cardinals in the World Series, completing a remarkable one-year transformation from worst to first in the American League.

The World Series will begin at Fenway Park on Wednesday

“Certainly, we hoped and prayed for it,” said the Red Sox’ chief executive and president, Larry Lucchino, who was on hand in St. Louis in 2004 when Boston won its first title in 86 years. “But we didn’t specifically plan for this. We never thought we could come so far so fast. We just wanted to get going in the right direction.”

That direction was up, out and over the wall, off the bat of the slumping Victorino.

Just as they did in Game 2 of this series, the Red Sox patiently waited for Detroit’s fearsome starter Max Scherzer to leave the game and then punished the Tigers’ bullpen. In Game 2, David Ortiz did the honors, with a game-tying shot. On Saturday, it was Victorino’s turn. He and Jim Thome are the only players to have hit two postseason grand slams.

“It was a special moment,” Victorino said. “It’s been a special year. We all battled, and special moments like this, you cherish it.”

Victorino, one of Boston’s many off-season additions who helped cleanse a toxic clubhouse from the two previous seasons, hit his other slam with Philadelphia in a National League division series in 2008; those Phillies went on to win the World Series.

Boston became the first team to have two grand slams in the seventh inning or later during one postseason, let alone one series.

Victorino’s blast on Saturday, which sailed over the Green Monster and into the dense pages of Red Sox history, came one at-bat after Detroit shortstop Jose Iglesias botched a ball that could have ended the inning with a double play.

Before Victorino batted, John Henry, the Red Sox’ principal owner, went from his suite to the Red Sox’ baseball operations suite, which held his general manager, Ben Cherington, and Cherington’s staff.

“They told me he was going to hit a first-pitch curveball,” Henry said. “It wasn’t on the first pitch, but it was a curveball, and it was incredible. We all just went crazy.”

So did Victorino, who pumped his fist and jumped as the ball cleared the Green Monster and then pounded his chest as he rounded the bases.

“No disrespect to them,” Victorino said. “I hope they understand it was a special moment for me and for the city.”

David Ortiz echoed that after the game, jokingly referring to his profane but heartfelt declaration from April, when, after the Boston Marathon bombings, he swore during a ceremony at Fenway Park. On Saturday night, Ortiz addressed the joyous crowd with the same words — almost.

“This is our bleeeep city,” he said to roars of approval.

Victorino noted that he failed to get down a bunt in the third inning with runners on first and second and nobody out — Scherzer caught the ball in the air — and said the play weighed on him until he made up for it four innings later.

“That question was definitely in my head: how am I going to explain not getting the bunt down?” he said. “In a crucial situation, you’ve got to minimize the mistakes. Every single thing counts. It makes it that much more special. I knew all along this was going to be a special team.”

How special will be determined over the next 10 days as two great clubs face off again. This World Series will be a rematch of 2004, when Boston put to rest the curse that had supposedly been put on the team for its selling of Babe Ruth to the Yankees after the 1919 season.


continued...

:whoo:

Merlot
 

Joe.t

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2003
3,876
310
83
Le Chabrol, Saint - Jacques
Visit site
Congratulations to Jose Iglesias for gift wrapping the ALCS to the Red Sox.

Keep in mind that it in baseball it is considered a failure if you do not win the World Serious, especially if you have a mind boggling, staggering team salary of let's say $173,186,617.
 

rumpleforeskiin

It's a whole new ballgame
Jan 20, 2007
6,560
28
48
48
Where I belong.
Keep in mind that it in baseball it is considered a failure if you do not win the World Serious, especially if you have a mind boggling, staggering team salary of let's say $173,186,617.
I would agree, Joe. There are, however, only two teams in baseball with team salaries that high, the Los Angeles Dodgers and New York Yankees. It's nice of you to admit that your team is a total failure.

The Red Sox, in fifth place overall behind the aforementioned, as well as the Phillies and Tigers, are at 140,657,500.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/salaries/_/name/bos/
 

Special K

‹^› ‹(•¿•)› ‹^›
May 3, 2003
5,079
4
38
Red Sox Nation
Visit site
9 years ago today THE Boston Red Sox completed the most incredible comeback in sports history, while the despised Evil Empire NY Yankees completed the biggest choke in the history of all organized sports. October 20, 2004 ALCS Game 7. Boston 10 NYY 3!
 

joelcairo

New Member
Jul 26, 2005
4,711
2
0
9 years ago today THE Boston Red Sox completed the most incredible comeback in sports history, while the despised Evil Empire NY Yankees completed the biggest choke in the history of all organized sports. October 20, 2004 ALCS Game 7. Boston 10 NYY 3!

Ironically, it was ALSO a Boston team that staged a miraculous comeback in hockey, when the Toronto Maple Leafs committed the most epic collapse in the history of Stanley Cup game sevens.

So, kudos to Boston sports teams!

PS: It also shows that the Yankees and Leafs have a lot in common, including their fanbases.
 
Toronto Escorts