Here's the Doc's offseason report card of the hockey thread's most prominent members. Grades are determined by every member's value to the hockey thread and the board:
Thanks for your opinion. Now, here is a much more accurate report card:
Joel Cairo: Unlike Holliday, I have the class not to brag about myself. I will let the readers decide. I will, however, point out that Holliday's nonsensical comments about me being "a very angry and negative person" are typical Holliday: in other words, totally fabricated and inaccurate BS.
Voyageur 11: A fan who contributes by exposing the BS constantly put forth by a certain poster. Grade: B.
Igna69xx: Has difficulty with spelling and grammar. Idolizes Holliday and is quick to defend him no matter WHAT Holliday has said. Uses the Holliday strategy of attacking the poster because he lacks the ability to debate politely, intelligently and factually. Has NEVER EVER criticized a single move by the Leafs and refuses to admit that mistakes were ever made by his beloved franchise...despite the overwhelming evidence of the last 48 years. Brags at the start of every season about how great his team is and then DISAPPEARS from the hockey threads as soon as his beloved heroes have their annual collapse. Inaccurately accuses other posters of the exact sins he and his idol are guilty of. Loved the Clarkson signing. Loved Burke. Loved the Nathan "Never Play Again" Horton signing. His idea of wit is to spell the names of other teams or cities without capital letters. Brings nothing of value to the hockey threads. Grade: F.
Anon Vlad: Always speaks intelligently and accurately. Asks probing questions. Clearly knows hockey. Grade: A.
Ballsamic: Knows BS when he sees it and is not afraid to point out the obvious. Grade: A.
Sol Tee Nutz: A class act and the sole Oilers supporter. A bright future for his team, and he's always honest enough to admit its shortcomings (UNLIKE Leaf fans). Grade: A minus.
G1GBallday: Honest, perceptive and witty. Grade: A.
Merlot: A bit too much of an apologist for Boston teams, and probably better versed in baseball and football than in hockey, but presents a detailed fact-referencing analysis of his opinions. Grade: B.
Doc Holliday: Does know his hockey - give him credit. Unfortunately, he lacks in politeness and honesty. He has made numerous statements that he subsequently claimed never to have said, despite the fact that various posters have seen - and often even QUOTED the proof. He likes to brag - sometimes with good reason, but often not. When he cannot intelligently oppose a different point of view, he personally insults the poster, usually with wildly inaccurate and ridiculous claims. Somehow, in spite of the board's rules, he usually gets away with this. He considers himself an armchair psychologist but is usually WAY off the mark - in fact, like the president of his fan club, he usually fits the profile of what he accuses others of. Unlike his disciple, however, he does at least have the guts to stick around when his Leafs collapse, and he is capable of reasonable spelling and grammar. He does provide value both by contributing some useful information and by providing impetus for debate. Too bad about his negative qualities. Grade: C+
And Two That Holliday Missed:
Gohabsgo: Someone who obviously knows hockey and who also has an excellent BS detector plus the guts and integrity to expose such BS. Grade: A
Wolfie7: Great taste in hockey teams, excellent hockey knowledge, good attitude. Grade: A.