Big Daddy Cool said:
btyger:
I don't know if this is true for all the states, but I've read that in many states that schools are financed by local tax dollars and not put in one big state pot, so it could be evenly devided. Since some areas are much poorer you get a situation where it's almost like having private schools within the public system, because the middle class areas would have much more tax dollars than a lower income area. Also, because these poorer areas tend to be black, blacks are put at a major disadvantage which is not right. In esance, all is not equal when it comes to oppertunity. It's too bad, because as a business person I love America, but their's a lot of untaped potential talent.
Ah, the eternal question: when is taxation without representation worth it?
My town's schools are paid for through my town's property taxes. I have a vested interest in being involved (or at least aware) in the educational system in my town, whether I have children there or not: If the schools suck, my property devalues. Conversely, if the schools rock, my property increases in value.
The City of Newark, NJ pays for only 15% of its own school budget. The remainder is paid for through state and federal aid. However, decisions about the schools remain mostly in local hands. Which means: improve your schools and you lose outside assistance, or keep them horrible, and keep sucking on the government teat. The end result for me is that my taxes go to something that I have no control over.
Furthermore, for the record, in NJ, the areas with the HIGHEST spending per student are also those with the WORST achievement records. Go figure.