Montreal Escorts

anti-Semitism

kkrack

Active Member
May 7, 2018
153
59
28
So if someone criticizes Israel he or she is anti-Semitic? Opposing to this genocide is anti-Semitic?

Israel is stretching the anti-Semitic card. It is hurting all the Jews. United states, Israel and the west in general are losing credibility and authority with this massacre. They should stop and discuss instead of obliterate the poor.

Who will the emerging country turn to? Perhaps China and Russia. They have already kicked out France out of Africa. The west is in rapid decline.
 

Mandouke

Well-Known Member
Apr 5, 2022
1,005
2,261
113
The West is in rapid decline because we have followed the policies of NGOs and International Organizations for decades. We elect governments nationally to represent us and present us with what we would hope are the best policies. These governments then bend over backwards to accommodate the policies of these NGOs and ignore the people who put them in power.

Look at Europe. This is what awaits us. Civil war is near and inevitable in many European countries and it will make what is happening in the Middle East look like child's play.

Wake up. When you are called a "racist" for holding a nationalist belief that your country is made up of indigenous people, it is meant to do one thing, shut you and your people up. This has been the case in the Western world.

I see that this is finally being realized, but the question remains; Is it too little, too late?
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderLipps

ThunderLipps

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2024
613
809
93
68
Now there is a pro-Palestine encampment set up at the university that plan to dig in for awhile. Personally against any protests for out of country issues we have no part in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: qc_forever

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,176
1,115
113
Casablanca
Mosab Yousef, a disowned son of a Hamas founder and leader and a Hamas defector, tells the truth about Hamas and its naive, ignorant supporters on college campuses in the U.S., Canada and Europe:

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TigerWould

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,176
1,115
113
Casablanca
The events of the past few weeks on college campuses have proved that only some kinds of speech are protected by college administrators:


...In the last two weeks, self-proclaimed pro-Palestinian protesters have set up encampments at dozens of American universities. Heedless of university restrictions against intimidation and harassment, they demonstrate where, when, and how they like. They cry “Go back to Poland,” “baby killers,” and “globalize the Intifada” at Jewish students. They wave the flags of designated terrorist groups, like Hezbollah and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and hold up signs that beckon “Al-Qasam’s Next Targets,” with an arrow pointing at Jewish counterprotesters. (Al-Qassam is the wing of Hamas that carried out the October 7 massacre.)

On campuses that have—for a decade or more—repeated ad nauseam that priority one was the creation of a “safe, inclusive, supportive, and fair” community, the pro-Palestinian demonstrators wave Hezbollah flags, wear Hamas headbands, and conceal their faces with masks. They ignore all time, place, and manner restrictions on student demonstrations set by their schools, and refuse all demands from the universities to take down their tents or to move their protests elsewhere. And at Columbia, until April 30, when protesters took over Columbia’s Hamilton Hall and the NYPD was at last called in, they almost got away with it.

At UCLA, protesters blocked students from entering the library during the midterms, asking those who wished to enter: “Are you a Zionist?” After a Jewish girl was reportedly beaten unconscious by pro-Palestinian protesters, pro-Israel counterprotesters at UCLA arrived in masks and hoodies, shooting off fireworks, firing tear gas, and throwing objects at the pro-Hamas protesters and attempting to physically destroy the encampments. Only then did UCLA call in the police to remove the encampments.

Instead of immediately suspending the pro-Hamas protesters for breaking university rules, for weeks, university administrations instead chose to “negotiate” with the rule-breakers. At Columbia, the administration offered to review its policy on “socially responsible investing” (read: divesting from the world’s only Jewish state), and offered to “make investments in health and education in Gaza.” At Brown, the administration promised protesters that they would put divestment from Israel on the agenda. At Northwestern, the administration meekly tossed rewards, including the promise to establish a full-ride scholarship for Palestinian students and guaranteed faculty jobs for Palestinian academics.

At Columbia, protesters rejected the offers, knowing they had the upper hand. When police arrived to break up the encampments, Columbia faculty in orange vests linked arms to form a human wall against the police, shielding the rule-breakers.

The lengths administrators have gone to placate, encourage, and embolden the pro-Hamas protesters in the past weeks provide a signal reminder that there are at least two sets of rules governing elite universities today: one for the favored, protected class; the other for everyone else. And in case anyone has any doubt which category Jewish students fall into, the unwillingness of universities to enforce their own codes of conduct against pro-Hamas protesters in the months since October 7 should disabuse them...

...Speech on college campuses has been stultifyingly narrow—and very far from free—for decades. That pro-Hamas students cheer freely for “intifada” doesn’t make it any freer now. The fact that certain students are allowed to call for the death of their Jewish classmates does not herald a new era of free expression. It only underscores that some bigotries enjoy the official sanction of these schools, and are accepted, tolerated, and rewarded with special dispensations and, indeed, goodies.

Use of the N-word on campus or misgendering a classmate will no doubt be met with as swift punitive consequences as they have been for decades, as have a vast and more minute array of “microaggressions.” I invite anyone who doubts this to parade through any of our elite campuses with insulting cartoon depictions of the Prophet Muhammad.

After weeks of violent, destructive protest, which left campuses trashed and buildings damaged and graffitied, administrators have at last begun to enforce their own rules and call in the police. Perhaps they felt they had no choice: commencement ceremonies loom and lawsuits, recently filed by Jewish students, are on the way.

But watch the marble carefully as university administrators spin the cups. When a favored group is attacked, they discover a “community safety” concern with remarkable alacrity. When it’s a disfavored group, suddenly the cup reveals “free expression.” The game is fixed, and the administrators show their hands. “Community safety,” or was it “free speech”? Surprise! They don’t believe in either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderLipps

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,176
1,115
113
Casablanca
Since the antisemetic demonstrations, encampments, building occupations and riots started on campuses and in left leaning cities, I have noticed how many of the troublemakers are girls and women. And most of them look overweight, unattractive (when you can see their faces) and sad and when they occasionally open their mouths to speak, they reveal themselves to be ignorant, dumb and neurotic.

How to explain this phenomenon? Heather Mac Donald, writing in City Journal explains:


...The female tilt among anti-Israel student protesters is an underappreciated aspect of the pro-Hamas campus hysteria. True, when activists need muscle (to echo University of Missouri professor Melissa Click’s immortal call during the 2015 Black Lives Matter protests), males are mobilized to smash windows and doors or hurl projectiles at the police, for example. But the faces behind the masks and before the cameras are disproportionately female, as seen in this recent gem from the Princeton demonstrations.

Why the apparent gender gap? One possible reason is that women constitute majorities of both student bodies and the metastasizing student-services bureaucracies that cater to them. Another is the sex skew in majors. The hard sciences and economics, whose students are less likely to take days or weeks out from their classes to party (correction: “stand against genocide”) in cool North Face tents, are still majority male. The humanities and soft social sciences, the fields where you might even get extra credit for your intersectional activism, are majority female. (Not surprisingly, males have spearheaded recent efforts to guard the American flag against desecration.) In progressive movements, the default assumption now may be to elevate females ahead of males as leaders and spokesmen. But most important, the victim ideology that drives much of academia today, with its explicit enmity to objectivity and reason as white male constructs, has a female character.

Student protests have always been hilariously self-dramatizing, but the current outbreak is particularly maudlin, in keeping with female self-pity. “The university would rather see us dead than divest,” said a member of the all-female press representatives of UCLA’s solidarity encampment on X. The university police and the Los Angeles Police Department “would rather watch us be killed than protect us.” (The academic Left, including these anti-Zionists, opposes police presence on campus; UCLA chancellor Gene Block apologized in June 2020 after the LAPD lawfully mustered on university property during the George Floyd race riots.) Command of language is not a strong point of these student emissaries. “There needs to be an addressment (sic) of U.S. imperialism and its ties to the [University of California] system,” said another UCLA encampment spokeswoman.

It was not too long ago when administrators started bringing in therapy dogs to campus libraries and dining halls to help a female-heavy student body cope with psychic distress, especially after the election of Donald Trump. “Trigger warnings” were implemented to protect female students from Ovid’s Metamorphoses and other great works of literature. Campus discourse and its media echo chamber rang with accounts of the mental-health crisis on campus, whose alleged sufferers were overwhelmingly female.

Par for the course, then, when the editors at the Columbia Law Review (majority female) adopted the rhetoric of trauma in demanding that Columbia Law School hand out a universal pass for Spring 2024 coursework. A May 1 action by the New York Police Department to evict violent trespassers from an administration building had left them, they wrote, “highly emotional,” “irrevocably shaken,” “unwell,” and “unable to focus”—in other words, displaying all the symptoms of Victorian neurasthenia.

It was not too long ago when a predominantly female professoriate, student population, and bureaucratic apparatus embraced the idea that students’ “safety” should be protected against the “hate speech” that allegedly jeopardized it. (Males, by contrast, place greater emphasis on academic freedom and truth-seeking, regardless of the alleged emotional consequences of intellectual inquiry.) Examples of dangerous speech included arguments that racial disparities are not caused by racism and that human beings cannot change their sex by proclamation.

Now, while still asserting their own unsafety, the pro-Hamas protesters have done an about-face when it comes to political disagreement and “safety,” at least where pro-Israel students are concerned. Nas Issa, a Palestinian alumna of Columbia University, told the New York Times that she saw a difference between feeling uncomfortable and feeling that you are in danger. Challenges to your identity or political ideology “can be personally affecting,” said Issa. “But I think the conflation between that and safety—it can be a bit misleading.”

It was also not too long ago when college campuses were shutting down or locking students in their dorms as an anti-Covid policy, notwithstanding overwhelming evidence showing that adolescents faced virtually no chance of serious Covid complications. This zero-risk policy, in its inability to balance costs and benefits rationally, was quintessentially female. It is fitting, therefore, that N95 masks have been repurposed as go-to accessories for the most up-to-date anti-settler-colonialist look. Females at the Columbia rally in front of Butler Library passed out the masks to the few participants not already wrapped up like mummies. When asked what the point was, one distributor answered, “to protect against Covid”—an answer that, sadly, could as easily be sincere as duplicitous.

Assuming the latter to be the case, hiding one’s face to escape accountability for one’s actions is the antithesis of manly virtue. The swaddled students would say that they have been forced into such precautions by the risk of “doxing.” But while a home address is properly private and should not be disclosed without permission, a face is public, and participation in public protest fair game for political accountability. The muffled freedom fighters are also aping Third World terrorists, of course, but the worst that might befall these revolutionary wannabes is rejection from their favored investment or consulting firm, not execution...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderLipps

crinolynne

New Member
Mar 11, 2019
14
10
3
Since the antisemetic demonstrations, encampments, building occupations and riots started on campuses and in left leaning cities, I have noticed how many of the troublemakers are girls and women. And most of them look overweight, unattractive (when you can see their faces) and sad and when they occasionally open their mouths to speak, they reveal themselves to be ignorant, dumb and neurotic.
Ah, such eloquent mysogyny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fin and Womaniser

ThunderLipps

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2024
613
809
93
68
Since the antisemetic demonstrations, encampments, building occupations and riots started on campuses and in left leaning cities,

Calgary got it right, brought in the police and dismantled the tents and either kicked them out or charged them. From the university " You have the right to a peaceful protest but no right to stay overnight ". One city with balls.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: CaptRenault

Carmine Falcone

Well-Known Member
Feb 11, 2017
707
985
93
1) I think the protests started as a legitimate concern for what is happening to civilians. Netanyahu has squandered all the sympathy Israel got from the October 7 attack by being indifferent about what happens to Palestinian civilians.

2) Please don't say Palestinians mostly support Hamas. Hamas hasn't held elections in years. But you want to know how to make Palestinians support Hamas? By killing their loved ones with bombs or starvation. Netanyahu thinks he can bomb his way out of this. Bombings only create future terrorists. If I'm Palestinian and my non-Hamas loved one died from Israel's action, don't you think I'd want revenge? Even if I don't join Hamas, I'll cheer for Hamas because Hamas will hurt those who hurt me.

3) Despite the protests meaning well, it's undeniable there has been some anti-Semitic rhetoric from it. So rather than talking about the Palestinian plight, we're now talking about people saying unacceptable things and people drawing attention to themselves by destroying property.

4) Anyone concerned about anti-Semitism who is normally simpatico with the GOP is someone not worth taking seriously at all.

I'm not religious but there is a quote in the Bible about worrying about the speck of dust in your neighbor's eye when there's an entire stick in your own eye. There is an element of anti-Semitism from some Democrats. But the Democrats aren't renowned for invoking George Soros' name for no relevant reason--except as an anti-Semitic dog whistle. The Democrats didn't elevate to a committee position someone who has dropped the Rothschild name as another dog whistle & said something about "Jewish Space Lasers." The Democrats don't support someone who courts the support of people who said "Jews will not replace us." Any GOP posturing as the party friendly to Jews is cynicism that works on only people with short memories. But considering 75% of Jewish voters routinely vote Democrat, the people who Republicans are trying to influence are more knowledgeable than that.
 

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,176
1,115
113
Casablanca
All you need to know about the Palestinians is that their Arab "brothers" in Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and even Yemen want nothing to do with them. They refuse to let in any Palestinians from Gaza. Why? A big reason is that those countries have learned a lesson from past influxes of Palestinians, i.e., they destabilize the politics and disrupt the peace of other Arab countries. No Arab country wants to take in people who support an extremist, violent and unruly group like Hamas.


...But getting back to the main point: The last thing the Arab states, particularly those around Palestine and Israel, wanted to see was an independent Palestinian movement, let alone a state.

...The so-called Arab street [a term for public opinion in the Arab world] was behind the Palestinian cause, but it never really affected policy on part of any of the Arab governments. As you go around the region almost all [the Arab governments] were united on one point, which was that the Palestinians were a threat, a foreign population that should be weakened if not exterminated.

In Syria, you had the orchestration of a campaign against the PLO, and in Jordan, and the same in Egypt. It is noteworthy there is no Palestinian population in Egypt. Going back to the days of [former Egyptian leader] Gamal Abdel Nasser, the Egyptians saw the threat. Again, the Palestinians contributed to their isolation through some spectacular acts like the assassination of a Jordanian prime minister in front of the Sheraton hotel in broad daylight in Cairo by two Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine [PLPF] gunmen, one of whom stooped down to drink the assassinated prime minister’s blood.

That is why Egypt just exploded when [U.S. Secretary of State] Tony Blinken proposed they give temporary sanctuary to Gazans. Again, there is an ideological overlay of enmity because of Hamas’ Muslim Brotherhood affiliation, but the deep antipathy and fear on the part of the Egyptian government toward the Palestinians predates that by decades.

All in all, the Palestinians have been hamstrung by their so-called Arab brothers. That was a line I picked up in Lebanon — when someone calls you “brother,” you know you’ve got to watch your back.

...I think we’ve missed the complexity of it, and the intensity. … I don’t think we understood in depth just how deeply rooted Syrian fear and antipathy toward the PLO and Palestinians really was. I don’t think we really understood how deep the chasm was between Arab rhetoric supporting the PLO and the fear and loathing behind the mask. In the case of Syria, how Assad could manage an extreme anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian position … with action on the ground that was decidedly anti-Palestinian. The Israelis certainly missed it as well...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThunderLipps

fin

Member
Mar 29, 2016
86
91
18
All you need to know about the Palestinians is that their Arab "brothers" in Jordan, Egypt, Syria, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, UAE and even Yemen want nothing to do with them. They refuse to let in any Palestinians from Gaza. Why? A big reason is that those countries have learned a lesson from past influxes of Palestinians, i.e., they destabilize the politics and disrupt the peace of other Arab countries. No Arab country wants to take in people who support an extremist, violent and unruly group like Hamas.

The words of this USA career diplomat and what they imply can be summarized as follows: the Palestinians are bad people. Very bad people. The Hamas leaders are worse. Nobody likes them. It is therefore justified to expel them from their land by any means. Racist laws in Israël, apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are therefore justified. Am I missing something?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Womaniser

minutemenX

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2015
913
944
93
around
Am I missing something?
Yes you do. What you do to people which are determined to kill you or at very best to kick you out of your home? Palestinians reject any compromise in the long term. Sometimes they agree on the temporary truce but never abandon their long-term goal: to get read of Jews from what they claim their land “from the river to the sea”. The whole population is indoctrinated by the ruling thugs with this idea from the kindergarten age for more than 70 years. Israel must show them again and again that this is a pipe dream that brings only suffering and stagnation, so they must abandon it. And this is what Israel is doing fighting for its very survival in the most hostile environment any country can find herself. Someday Palestinians and Arabs in general will be ready for compromise. Israelis have nowhere to go.
 
Last edited:

ThunderLipps

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2024
613
809
93
68
Read an opinion piece awhile ago. Someone stated that if the Palestines laid down their weapons there would be peace, if Israel laid down their weapons they would be slaughtered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaptRenault

CaptRenault

A poor corrupt official
Jun 29, 2003
2,176
1,115
113
Casablanca
 

Gearóid Walsh

New Member
Jun 4, 2024
15
25
3
42
I am astonished that they failed to anticipate and make provisions for the "white colonial settler". A left social criticism golem that has turned against Israel, all while fulfilling its purpose of disenfranchising Europeans.

The only notion that comes to mind:

1. Such is the consequence of labeling any critique as "anti-Semitism". It disrupts the flow of constructive criticism and one's overarching approach.

2. Israel is at risk, and the Ashkenazim are embarking on a journey "home" to New Jerusalem, i.e. Ukraine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiinston17

snakejack

Active Member
Nov 9, 2023
167
137
43
44
I can not believe how anti-Semitic the NYC universities are. I won't mention their names because I don't want to burnish their reputation. The problem is almost as bad as the Canadian universities. It's funny how everyone acts a certain way until the mask is uncovered and then you see the ugly person underneath.
When you say that Canadian universities are antisemitic, it’s a very serious accusation.

Can you elaborate ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiinston17

snakejack

Active Member
Nov 9, 2023
167
137
43
44
Most young people dont care about jewishness but they understand more and more that what has been going on since 1947 is to get rid of arabs and take their land. Ethnic cleansing and genocide. History did not began on october 7.
Very clear and straightforward sir.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wiinston17

snakejack

Active Member
Nov 9, 2023
167
137
43
44

Fradi

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2019
3,717
5,928
113
Around the corner
You can laugh but billions of people around the world rely on the US to promote democracy, maintain peace and order and protect trade. It's an enormous responsibility and one we bear willingly. I realize this may seem like a foreign concept to a country like Canada but every American feels a responsibility to help fix the world. It's just the type of people we are. We're always trying to make the world better. I'm worried people will see the anti-Semitism in the US and feel that it's now acceptable, which would be a tragedy. Hopefully the media will do a better job of calling out all the anti-Semitism in the world and shaming those people as Nazis who engage in such dialogue.
God bless America lol.
Yep and usually front page news is who won the baseball or football game.
 
Ashley Madison
Toronto Escorts