Hello everyone, I would possibly like to know from lawyers if possible are Canada's prostitution laws are too broad, hence able to be challenged by the court system.
IMO, it seems that the judges are none too impressed with past or present laws. (I'll get to this later) .
-At present section 213 , does not define what a "sexual act" is.
-Also at present 213 , is so over broad with " stopping a car or attempting to stop a car" that i wonder is it able to be challenged in the courts?
Given Canada V Bedford, and R v. Anwar, you'd think this nonsense would have some reasonable outcome.
IMO, it seems that the judges are none too impressed with past or present laws. (I'll get to this later) .
-At present section 213 , does not define what a "sexual act" is.
-Also at present 213 , is so over broad with " stopping a car or attempting to stop a car" that i wonder is it able to be challenged in the courts?
Given Canada V Bedford, and R v. Anwar, you'd think this nonsense would have some reasonable outcome.