“this was a "message poisoning" that was designed to teach Navalny a lesson”
“Message was intended for international intelligence communities, not the media or you”
“It's a statement with 2 meanings, one for those in the media, the other for the people in the intelligence”
“but the message Putin is putting out there is that if they really wanted him dead, they would have finished the job”
“the statement was intended to put out a message that they did not really use the full dosage and held back, as they wanted Navalny to suffer to his end.”
“Of course Russia botched the attempt at Navalny's life”
(“Putin has a very adorable chuckle, but I couldn’t understand what he said”). Lol.
I'm maybe not the sharpest pencil in the box, but I must admit I'm a little confused.
So I have a question:
Putin says — and I quote — "If [they] wanted to, they would've probably finished it".
If the attempt was "botched" (cause "they really wanted him dead”) how could it have initially been conceived as a designed "poisoning message", no matter who it was addressed to, Navalny, CIA, the media, Mi6, Donald, the Queen, the Gambit, you and me?
I also have another not-so-sharp pencil question:
How to establish the right dose for a "poisoning message" ( not a "full dosage”) with the solid form of the poison when the toxicology experts quoted by CNN say this:
"Short of injecting exactly the right dose into someone, it is almost impossible for the perpetrator to dose Novichok so as to incapacitate rather than kill". (My emphasis)
“Message was intended for international intelligence communities, not the media or you”
“It's a statement with 2 meanings, one for those in the media, the other for the people in the intelligence”
“but the message Putin is putting out there is that if they really wanted him dead, they would have finished the job”
“the statement was intended to put out a message that they did not really use the full dosage and held back, as they wanted Navalny to suffer to his end.”
“Of course Russia botched the attempt at Navalny's life”
(“Putin has a very adorable chuckle, but I couldn’t understand what he said”). Lol.
I'm maybe not the sharpest pencil in the box, but I must admit I'm a little confused.
So I have a question:
Putin says — and I quote — "If [they] wanted to, they would've probably finished it".
If the attempt was "botched" (cause "they really wanted him dead”) how could it have initially been conceived as a designed "poisoning message", no matter who it was addressed to, Navalny, CIA, the media, Mi6, Donald, the Queen, the Gambit, you and me?
I also have another not-so-sharp pencil question:
How to establish the right dose for a "poisoning message" ( not a "full dosage”) with the solid form of the poison when the toxicology experts quoted by CNN say this:
"Short of injecting exactly the right dose into someone, it is almost impossible for the perpetrator to dose Novichok so as to incapacitate rather than kill". (My emphasis)
Putin says if Russia wanted to kill opposition leader Navalny, it would have 'finished' the job | CNN
Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed Thursday that opposition politician Alexey Navalny "is enjoying the support of the US special services," adding that if Russian special services had wanted to kill him they would have "finished it."
www.cnn.com
Last edited: