Charlie Kirk shot dead today

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

This is legitimately problematic as these agents are paid to take a bullet for whomever they are protecting regardless of their politics.

Exactly.

If people in positions of public safety, education, or any role of public trust are openly advocating for someone’s death, they have no business being responsible for the care others.

They should lose their jobs. Period.

It’s like a Toyota employee telling a customer to go buy a Volkswagen.
If you’re in a position meant to serve or protect people, and you actively go against that purpose, you’re in the wrong role.

 

[Zero_Six]

The left would cause riots and burn things down and attack more people (as they’re inciting to do so right now). Has the right done this? Not really, no.

Jan 6.

 

[clemieux6]

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

View attachment 103222

Ahhhhh yes. The great noticing continues !!!!!
I believe it was them hahahaa and not a little kid they used as a shooter needed to push for a storyline. Which is indeed fueling the left / right at this moment.

They still silenced him for the same narratives he was questioning on campuses and on his streams.

This isn’t my 1st psyop

 

[CaptRenault]

Hmm…interesting.

Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin lived with transgender partner who is now cooperating with FBI: Officials

EXCLUSIVE: Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin lived with his transgender partner, Fox News Digital has learned.

www.foxnews.com

 

[philonius]

He wasn't trans, but trans-adjacent, is now the new bogeyman? Jesus, the reaching is so desperate since he's from a white, middle-class, gun-loving, conservative upbringing? Would've been so much easier if he was brown, huh? Have no fear, Fox News will sort out the real problem!!111

 

[EagerBeaver]

He wasn't trans, but trans-adjacent

What is that? I never heard this term before.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

Jan 6.

So now you’re pulling out some random, irrelevant riot just to score points? This doesn’t suddenly prove that your argument is airtight.

The left has rioted in abundance. Burning, looting, destruction of property... a cherry-picked event doesn’t magically make your point right.

Here’s another counter example:
-No Kings Protests - June 14, 2025

I want to highlight yesterday’s Canada 1st protest where an unhinged liberal buffoon got arrested for, well, being an unhinged liberal buffoon:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967000115144782028

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

What is that? I never heard this term before.

There are new updates and DLC drops every other day with them.

 

[philonius]

A lot of y'all feeds must just be a spigot of hot hateful garbage. What a shitty feeling to be pumped with fear and anger all fucking day. There aren't enough cat videos to offset the laser beam of curated outrage being levelled your way so I understand why you have to refract it out to the rest of us.

 

[zzayne]

In the end this is just another shooting in America. Some of the chatter here reminds me of 2010 when I used to argue/debate with randoms on YouTube. In hindsight, what a waste of time that was.

 

[philonius]

The only one angered here seems you dude lol. Dont project

Lol. The "I'm not mad, you're mad" defense. I could care less about this POS and the POS that killed him. The saving grace is that in a few months we won't hear about either of these losers.

 

[Zero_Six]

So now you’re pulling out some random, irrelevant riot just to score points? This doesn’t suddenly prove that your argument is airtight.

The left has rioted in abundance. Burning, looting, destruction of property... a cherry-picked event doesn’t magically make your point right.

Here’s another counter example:
-No Kings Protests - June 14, 2025

I want to highlight yesterday’s Canada 1st protest where an unhinged liberal buffoon got arrested for, well, being an unhinged liberal buffoon:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1967000115144782028

How exactly is Jan 6 random or irrelevant?
BTW, at no point have I condoned any riots or protests. You're simply putting me into the "people I don't agree with" box and assuming what I think.

I would love to debate more but we're unfortunately on uneven footing. We both post stuff each other disagrees with. The difference is that at no point have I insulted you whereas you regularly call me a toddler, dumb, brainwashed, etc... Unlike you, I can be suspended for saying stuff like that. If you weren't an SP and supporting member, you would've been banned a long time ago.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

The only one angered here seems you dude lol. Dont project

When facts don’t work, the left throws labels, shame, and tantrums. Debate? No chance! Just emotional outbursts and name-calling.

The irony? They scream about “tolerance” while losing their minds over anyone who dares to think differently.

Look at Charlie: he was called a racist lmao a Nazi, fascist, bigot - for simply refusing to gobble up gender identity politics for example.

Being hated for asking questions proves you’re on the right side of history.

 

[philonius]

Still projecting. I see . And its not a defense its a fact . You should reread what you write . And good job calling someone who was murdered a pos and for what? Cause he spoke things you disagreed. Speak wonders of your character like i said in the outset to another .

You seem to have a tenuous grip of what a fact is so let's agree to disagree. Just because he was murdered doesn't make what he did and said disappear, nor minimize the impact he had on weaponizing division and hatred towards marginalized peoples the world over. Dying doesn't absolve anyone of their sins, a pretend Christian like him would've known that.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

How exactly is Jan 6 random or irrelevant?

The left clings to Jan 6 like it was 9/11, while completely ignoring months of actual political violence, riots, and destruction that came from their own side. That is why

BTW, at no point have I condoned any riots or protests. You're simply putting me into the "people I don't agree with" box and assuming what I think.

Well it doesn’t a take rocket scientist to figure out who vouches for what. I’m labelled everyday - I still sleep okay at night.

I would love to debate more but we're unfortunately on uneven footing. We both post stuff each other disagrees with. The difference is that at no point have I insulted you whereas you regularly call be a toddler, dumb, brainwashed, etc

I referred to all of us as toddlers hahah. I generalized a group whether you consider yourself a part of it or not. Obviously you take offense. But that’s the difference between you n me I guess.

I don’t cry when people of “your group” call people of “my group” these things:

A lot of y'all feeds must just be a spigot of hot hateful garbage. What a shitty feeling to be pumped with fear and anger all fucking day.

I simply move on. As everyone should. Because there is a clear divide. It’s irrelevant emotional outbursts lmao. And I’m used to seeing this from my ex group aka your group. Not the end of the world there.

... Unlike you, I can be suspended for saying stuff like that. If you weren't an SP and supporting member, you would've been banned a long time ago.

I can also get suspended. You guys aren’t the only ones.

Also there are waaaaaaayyyy worse SPs that are demeaning and talk down to members here on this board compared to me but let’s forget about that.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

I could care less about this POS and the POS that killed him. The saving grace is that in a few months we won't hear about either of these losers.

Classy, calm and collected. And not hateful at all like you contradicted yourself here:

A lot of y'all feeds must just be a spigot of hot hateful garbage. What a shitty feeling to be pumped with fear and anger all fucking day. There aren't enough cat videos to offset the laser beam of curated outrage being levelled your way so I understand why you have to refract it out to the rest of us.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

BTW. I wouldn’t chime in on a thread if I “didn’t care less about a POS” I’d just move on to other threads like the “face painting” thread or the “food thread” to communicate with my online friends.

It’s like me entering the PGA championship thread and telling everyone, “Hey guys! Golf fucken sucks”

Literal waste of time as the other guy commented and adds no valuable contribution to the Charlie thread.

 

[philonius]

Classy, calm and collected. And not hateful at all like you contradicted yourself here:

Pointing out the hateful social media feeds you must be subject to is itself hateful? I guess I don't have a grasp of the nuances of the English language like you.

To see hate, you must yourself be hateful? The circles you spin yourself around in.

You win. I am hate personified. I have said all I'm going to say here since every word seems to be an attack and every sentence a heinous crime. I thought this was the free speech crowd? Probably I'll end up being cancelled by the people who rail against cancel-culture. The irony weaves itself into knots.

 

[Valentina Amante | LAVAL]

Charlie was a hateful racist man:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1966970142522585460