No question, Merlot. And, truth be told, in my final six months of hobbying, I gave 90% or more of my business to Chloe's because of the great results. However, I had a long conversation with Billy some six months ago and he told me to expect something huge, something that was going to change the entire face of the industry. And, from several accounts, that's what he told the girls as well. And what is the result, some six months later...just another website.
Chloe's Playground/MTLGFE
- Thread starter spacecadet
- Start date
The question is does their website make the job??
Yes it does and nicely without being the best it is certainely among the best i would say
Therefore unformately it doesn't change the face of the industry.
If I would compare I think i prefer xxxtase website mostly because of those background
MTLGFE regarding them has made a lil too much i believe.
To repeat myself this website is among the best without being the best itself!
Yes it does and nicely without being the best it is certainely among the best i would say
Therefore unformately it doesn't change the face of the industry.
If I would compare I think i prefer xxxtase website mostly because of those background
MTLGFE regarding them has made a lil too much i believe.
To repeat myself this website is among the best without being the best itself!
Yup, til now it's don't change the face of the industry in MTL!! But who cares?
Good website, all the infos seems on the site, it's nice and clean and easy to use...and I have to admit that I love the style of the whole thing.
J'aurais tout de même appréciés des photos plus récentes des régulières (Molly, Stacy) pour uniformiser le site avec les photos plus récentes (ex. Jenna, Jersey), et même si le site est MTLGFE, les photos de bancs de parcs et de facebook peuvent convenir sur merb pour nous donner une idée, mais pour le site, et surtout le lancement du site, ça aurait été cool que toutes les filles aient des photos "professionnel" uniforme. Ça change pas grand chose au final mais ça ajoute un petit truc qui fait en sorte qu'on ce dit que eux, ils sont ça coche!
La page HOME n'ajoute rien a l'ensemble c'est une page vide, on pourrait entrer sur le site sur un genre de portail avec le About US et le Who's on tonight par exemple. Dans la schedule, le nom de la demoiselle pourrait être un lien vers son profile, on serait pas obligé de retourner dans la page GIRLS. Le site est tout a fait convenable sur IPAD, mais pas optimisé non plus (largeur des pages).
15 Gils in the 'Our Girls' section but only 6 in the schedule...
Maybe they ment we could 'DREAM' about the other girls !
Maybe they ment we could 'DREAM' about the other girls !
It's true! Though i'm wondering where is Mary? Also it seem we haven't seen Riley on schedule since while isn't it?
I absolutely love retirement parties, when is it rumps?, I will be sure to mark it on my calendar, I hope that I didn't miss it.
Question- What/Who was the motivating factor that convinced you to retire rumps, was it Lucille?, inquiring minds want to know.
There's a popular term in the marketing world: branding. What we have here is a case of two guys, the dream team dreaming obviously, with the best brand in the local trade, Chloe's Playground, winner of the best agency in town and what do they do? Change their name. Go figure.
Imagine Joe Blow coming to Montreal. He looks at the best agency poll and sees Montreal Sex City and Chloe's Playground. So what does he do but search for their girls. What does he find? A whole bunch of listings for MSC and for Chloe's he finds nothing. What does he do? He calls MSC.
What Mike and Billy have done is take everything they've built up over the last two years and flushed it all down the toilet.
"He looks at the best agency poll and sees Montreal Sex City and Chloe's Playground. So what does he do but search for their girls. What does he find? A whole bunch of listings for MSC and for Chloe's he finds nothing. What does he do? He calls MSC."
"What Mike and Billy have done is take everything they've built up over the last two years and flushed it all down the toilet."
Hello Rumps,
Excellent point! Your disappointment about the look of the website was very understandable considering the promises made. Still, I think the resulting site is mostly fine. But this name brand change could be a real problem for potential clients browsing for an escort site who are unaware of the connection to Chloe's and it's top notch recognition for the last two years. If the agency felt a need to move up on search engines in the "Montreal" sex industry scene then why not something like...Chloe's Playground of Montreal...Chloe's Montreal Playground...Chloe's GFE Playground of Montreal.
Also, that first page we get when hitting http://mtlgfe.com/ is uuuuuggggglllllyyyy!!! It reminds me of some dead end redirect page that leads nowhere. The rest of the site is fine. But a bare 6-letter acronym for a name...ISH!
Cheers,
Merlot
"What Mike and Billy have done is take everything they've built up over the last two years and flushed it all down the toilet."
Hello Rumps,
Excellent point! Your disappointment about the look of the website was very understandable considering the promises made. Still, I think the resulting site is mostly fine. But this name brand change could be a real problem for potential clients browsing for an escort site who are unaware of the connection to Chloe's and it's top notch recognition for the last two years. If the agency felt a need to move up on search engines in the "Montreal" sex industry scene then why not something like...Chloe's Playground of Montreal...Chloe's Montreal Playground...Chloe's GFE Playground of Montreal.
Also, that first page we get when hitting http://mtlgfe.com/ is uuuuuggggglllllyyyy!!! It reminds me of some dead end redirect page that leads nowhere. The rest of the site is fine. But a bare 6-letter acronym for a name...ISH!
Cheers,
Merlot
Last edited:
2 b honest i couldnt give 2 shits about the site, as long as they have pics of the girls and the agency provides great girls with great service who gives a fuck?
if its a basic site and theyll keep charging 160-180 or they have to pay some1 for a super wow site and charge me 200 ill take the basic site ALL DAY LONG!
if its a basic site and theyll keep charging 160-180 or they have to pay some1 for a super wow site and charge me 200 ill take the basic site ALL DAY LONG!
Yup, and if I were opening an agency in Montreal right now, you know what name I'd choose? Chloe's Playground. It's the best brand in Montreal and it's totally up for grabs and nobody's using in. (I'm assuming a) that Mike and Billy haven't filed a trademark and b) that if they had, they be quite a bit less than likely to pursue legal recourse.
About their website, on my macbook pro with standard settings, one of the most common mac on the market, 2 pages do not display correctly.
1 On chloe's girls page, the girls' info characters override the separation marks between the vignettes;
2 On the who's on tonight page, the girl names and full profile link display over the short description
1 On chloe's girls page, the girls' info characters override the separation marks between the vignettes;
2 On the who's on tonight page, the girl names and full profile link display over the short description
Not on mine, but any web designer worth his salt would test the coding on all major browsers on both major platforms. However, on the about us page, there are two lines of text:
> Click for Official Best Agency of the Year Poll Results
> Click for GFE of the Year 2011 Final Poll
Both of these hyper-links are missing. Wow. On top of being five months late and their abandoning the best brand in town, the best they can produce is a sloppy site. I sincerely hope they didn't pay for this.
They kicked out her person first, now its time to kick out her name too, It make sure this agency will not have any connection with Chloe anymore. I saw it happen in the beginning.
I am tending to agree with Rumples on this although it should be noted that Chloe is with FKS now and using her own name.
I don't know what the law is in Montreal but in Connecticut, the trade name statute would or might also come into play. I would guess that Quebec has the same type of statute. The statute requires legitimate businesses that are using fictitious names, as opposed to real names, to register the name in the local municipality in which it is doing business, so that those who have a dispute with the business know who to legally sue. The question becomes what is a fictitious name one must register, and what is a "real" name that is exempt from registration (example: Joe Blow's Plumbing and Heating is considered a real name because Joe Blow operates the business. On the other hand, "Second Cup" is the fictitious trade name of a coffee shop and they would have to register). The purpose of the law is to "know the person or company behind the fictitious name."
Some years ago, on behalf of a client, I got into a legal pissing match with a well known local business chain where the client was injured. Upon scrutiny of the local trade name registry I observed that their business name was not registered. Thus I did not know who to sue, properly, because there were 8 different corporations in Connecticut registered with the Secretary of State using that name in some fashion.
I sued all 8, and it turned out, the correct two companies behind the trade name were among the 8 I sued. I then let the other 6 out of the lawsuit, and amended the lawsuit to sue the 2 correct defendants for violations of Connecticut's trade name statute and Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practice Act, in addition to seeking damages for my client's personal injuries.
Incredibly, the defendants argued that they were using their real name. The basis for this argument was, "everyone knows who we are." I argued they were using a fictititious name because they were a corporation, and their name was a "made up" legal name which was a fiction (think "Second Cup"). I argued that the test was whether they came out of someone's womb and were given a birth certificate. After a heated oral argument in Court I lost on the trade name and CUTPA claims, because the politically correct, wimpy-assed judge decided he did not want to rock their boat. I did win on the underlying personal injury claim.
I don't think any of the parties to the present controversy came out of someone's womb named "Chloe Milan." Technically it would probably be a fictitious name subject to trade name registration requirements - as well as trademark law.
I would bet a month's worth of my salary plus my bonuses, against a stale Tim Horton donut, that none of these people will ever litigate these issues in any Canadian court.
I don't know what the law is in Montreal but in Connecticut, the trade name statute would or might also come into play. I would guess that Quebec has the same type of statute. The statute requires legitimate businesses that are using fictitious names, as opposed to real names, to register the name in the local municipality in which it is doing business, so that those who have a dispute with the business know who to legally sue. The question becomes what is a fictitious name one must register, and what is a "real" name that is exempt from registration (example: Joe Blow's Plumbing and Heating is considered a real name because Joe Blow operates the business. On the other hand, "Second Cup" is the fictitious trade name of a coffee shop and they would have to register). The purpose of the law is to "know the person or company behind the fictitious name."
Some years ago, on behalf of a client, I got into a legal pissing match with a well known local business chain where the client was injured. Upon scrutiny of the local trade name registry I observed that their business name was not registered. Thus I did not know who to sue, properly, because there were 8 different corporations in Connecticut registered with the Secretary of State using that name in some fashion.
I sued all 8, and it turned out, the correct two companies behind the trade name were among the 8 I sued. I then let the other 6 out of the lawsuit, and amended the lawsuit to sue the 2 correct defendants for violations of Connecticut's trade name statute and Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practice Act, in addition to seeking damages for my client's personal injuries.
Incredibly, the defendants argued that they were using their real name. The basis for this argument was, "everyone knows who we are." I argued they were using a fictititious name because they were a corporation, and their name was a "made up" legal name which was a fiction (think "Second Cup"). I argued that the test was whether they came out of someone's womb and were given a birth certificate. After a heated oral argument in Court I lost on the trade name and CUTPA claims, because the politically correct, wimpy-assed judge decided he did not want to rock their boat. I did win on the underlying personal injury claim.
I don't think any of the parties to the present controversy came out of someone's womb named "Chloe Milan." Technically it would probably be a fictitious name subject to trade name registration requirements - as well as trademark law.
I would bet a month's worth of my salary plus my bonuses, against a stale Tim Horton donut, that none of these people will ever litigate these issues in any Canadian court.
Last edited:
Similar threads
