Hello Turbo,
I'm not sure if you mean this in a positive way or not. Having a constituency doesn't mean she has any real positive importance. In 1923 a funny little man obsessed with power used the same method of easily grasped simple statements full of ugly hyperbolic demagoguery to build a constituency among those who were also desperate to believe in something. So rose the Nazi Party.
Okay, putting away the extreme examples, every elected official at any level has a de-facto constituency. The problem with hers is any persons who would stick with such an unrepentant irrational fear mongering leader no matter what she says are probably as irresponsible and dangerous as she is. I'm not saying they are irrelevant, but the fact that people of this ilk on either side of the extreme political spectrum, who grasp at overly simplistic answers based on prejudice, ignorance, irrationality, and desperation worst of all...are a great risk to everyone and everything when they empower any kind like Bachman.
Unfortunately there are a lot of Bachmans with constituencies.
Why don't we investigate everyone for everything if there's nothing wrong with "investigations"? I have a first cousin who works for the IRS. I can have him investigate you thoroughly if you want to stand by your McCarthyite premise. Please submit your SS# and we'll get this going ASAP so you can enjoy exactly what you so blithely push on others.
Common sense would say that a key assistant to the Secretary of State, who also happens to be a viable Presidential candidate herself, as well as an ex-President's wife, has probably been vetted (INVESTIGATED) up the butt already till it hurts, and was certainly being watched as a matter of standard procedure before Bachman said anything.
God help us, :amen:
Merlot
What Bachman has going for her is that she looks good on camera and her divisive statements are brief and easily grasped onto by people that want to believe in.....something. She has a constituency.
I'm not sure if you mean this in a positive way or not. Having a constituency doesn't mean she has any real positive importance. In 1923 a funny little man obsessed with power used the same method of easily grasped simple statements full of ugly hyperbolic demagoguery to build a constituency among those who were also desperate to believe in something. So rose the Nazi Party.
Okay, putting away the extreme examples, every elected official at any level has a de-facto constituency. The problem with hers is any persons who would stick with such an unrepentant irrational fear mongering leader no matter what she says are probably as irresponsible and dangerous as she is. I'm not saying they are irrelevant, but the fact that people of this ilk on either side of the extreme political spectrum, who grasp at overly simplistic answers based on prejudice, ignorance, irrationality, and desperation worst of all...are a great risk to everyone and everything when they empower any kind like Bachman.
Unfortunately there are a lot of Bachmans with constituencies.
What's wrong with investigations? Nothing. If Abedin has no communication with her family or others that her family knows concerning the Muslim brotherhood, then there is no problem.
Why don't we investigate everyone for everything if there's nothing wrong with "investigations"? I have a first cousin who works for the IRS. I can have him investigate you thoroughly if you want to stand by your McCarthyite premise. Please submit your SS# and we'll get this going ASAP so you can enjoy exactly what you so blithely push on others.
Common sense would say that a key assistant to the Secretary of State, who also happens to be a viable Presidential candidate herself, as well as an ex-President's wife, has probably been vetted (INVESTIGATED) up the butt already till it hurts, and was certainly being watched as a matter of standard procedure before Bachman said anything.
God help us, :amen:
Merlot