Did you read Bachmann's statement? Probably not, since it seems you do not like to read.
I will post part of it. The part I underlined previously:
“Most recently, the State Department shockingly decided to give Hani Nour Eldin, a member of an Egyptian designed terrorist group, a visa to not only enter the country in violation of the federal laws prohibiting material support for terrorism, but to be granted a meeting inside the White House with National Security Council officials.
Go throw around your McCarthyism name calling crap. Instead of intelligently discussing issues, you always denigrate others, like myself, with baseless attacks and name calling.
http://bachmann.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=303509
DD
First, your hardcore Conservative pal Rollins threw out the McCarthy comment. Call him about it...and call him a Liberal like you call anyone like him who opposes your opinion.
Second, I realize you believe in Bachman because she confirms what you think. No one learns anything by looking for people who only give them the answers they want. But even among the most prominent leaders of the entire Republican Party they believe she is totally out of line. Why should anyone take her word for any evidence when her own party leader Boehner, the Speaker of the House, thinks her view is "DANGEROUS", and her campaign manager Ed Rollins matches her view with an infamous witch hunter like McCarthy.
Third and most importantly, if Bachman got the basic facts about Eldin right, neither she nor anyone has shown the least bit of any connection of Abedin with Eldin, so there is no cause at all to investigate her beyond the original vetting.
"If there is nothing to hide"...
You don't like being connected to McCarthy yet you support the precise mantra he used to persecute people. Isn't it classic how the ultra-Conservatives who always get so pissed off about having their rights violated, especially concerning government intrusion into their lives, have no problem with insisting everyone should just submit to government investigations on suspicions of the most specious kind.
When Chomsky called the attack on Pearl Harbour an act of self defence....I found that statement beyond ridiculous.
I have to ask if you are informed on the U.S. trade policies and actions that were cutting off essential supplies for what has been one of the most import dependent countries for raw materials in the world? I am not saying the embargo on Japan wasn't justified or that the attack of Dec 7, 1941 wasn't despicable, but the self-defense argument from the Japanese angle is perfectly realistic despite the fact they were defending conquest, pillage, and tyranny.
Whatever Chomsky may be, I never heard any notable (or any) historian fail to point out that from Japan's view it was "self-defense".
Man, rumps, since you are a Jew from Brooklyn you sure hate your own people.
I guess I missed this info before, but if Rumps is Jewish I didn't know until this. Isn't this a little personal and out of line?
Geeeez,
Merlot