Euphoria agency in the news

[Deeman514]

You think they’ll delete everyone’s information?

 

[Johnny test]

tout le monde s'en calice aussi

à part nous lol

 

[Lunaseraphim]

They usually post on merb “Thursday at euphoria but did not today”

I wonder if merb members who knows will have balls to book again lol ?

But they can count on the tourist & none merbs member to book without knowing that they are in the spotlights today

Most merb users actually don't look at lounge posts.. or not as often as some others.

à part nous lol

Oui parce que pour certaines d'entre nous c'est notre revenu. Je me sens vraiment mal pour les femmes qui travaillent chez Euphoria en ce moment.

Pour les clients vous avez peur de perdre accès à ces services ou que la police contacte des milliers de personnes qui ont sollicité des services de l'agence.. ce qui n'arrivera pas.

 

[hob12]

Il est nommé seulement parce qu'une journaliste a prétendu vouloir se faire engager par l'agence et il s'est présenté..

Mais, oui, la police s'en calice et en effet, tout le monde s'en calice aussi. les élections viennent d'arriver.. il y a d'autres sujets d'actualité plus importants en ce moment. Je n'ai entendu personne parler de ces articles et ce reportage à part ici, contrairement a celui qui avait paru au sujet d'XO au printemps passé..

Ils ont aussi utiliser son nom de famille. Ils ont quand même pousser leurs recherches.

Entk. M'a prendre un petit step back de tout ça.

 

[Hmmm…]

You think they’ll delete everyone’s information?

For money

 

[2fast2slow]

La vérité c'est que la police est déjà overstretched et a plusieurs chats à fouetter. Dans 1 semaine, tout le monde aura oublié ce reportage.

C'est quand même très spécial de les voir nommer James par contre...

thats what I think too. The policeman kinda hinted at that in the article.
I also find the naming of James by his full name seems unusual, like its personnal to the reporter. But I guess acceptable by local journalism standards. I mean the journalist has recorded proof.

 

[Petit prince]

Thinking about a booker. lol It was smart to make a move from euphoria to forever

 

[hob12]

thats what I think too. The policeman kinda hinted at that in the article.
I also find the naming of James by his full name seems unusual, like its personnal to the reporter. But I guess acceptable by local journalism standards. I mean the journalist has recorded proof.

Yeah, not like he can sue them for defamation...

 

[Hmmm…]

Yes that's what I'm saying. When one or both are criminalized, it actually does not reduce harm, it creates more harm. Even if they say it's to ''eliminate trafficking'', it's a lie. It's just conservative values. No women and children are being protected with these laws. It just pushes sex trafficking further underground and even harder to detect. The internet is actually a good thing for providers, the censorship laws, fosta sesta, etc has actually forced many women to lose certain advantages. They absolutely do not prevent trafficking, they don't prevent pimps from existing.

Of course, but the logic is that if we simply give every provider and client lethal injection as deterrence or better yet, lock up every woman in a room in their father or husband’s home and only allow women outside escorted by family, there would be no harm from prostitution as there would be no prostitution. We all know there is no prostitution in Saudi Arabia because of protective laws like these. I think science could solve this problem. We simply need to eliminate the female gender altogether and develop an artificial surrogacy womb for reproduction. Then all men will have the freedom to walk around unencumbered by the female gaze shirtless and oiled up.

 

[LC18]

Je pense que toutes les agences sont à risque de passer sous le bistouri de se faire disséquer comme XO et Euphoria. Mais bon, c’est tellement plus safe et privé de dealer avec une agence comme vous le dites …

 

[Johnny test]

Je pense que toutes les agences sont à risque de passer sous le bistouri de se faire disséquer comme XO et Euphoria

ça semble effectivement être la tendance

 

[Crazylixx88]

They usually post on merb “Thursday at euphoria but did not today”

I wonder if merb members who knows will have balls to book again lol ?

But they can count on the tourist & none merbs member to book without knowing that they are in the spotlights today

Merb will still book. Agencies i think have a huge merb clientele . But outside of merb as well people book. As far as euphoria goes i highly doubt its gonna close all of a sudden . They still have girls on schedule , some times havent changed today but yea . Will see what happens i guess

 

[Hmmm…]

Merb will still book. Agencies i think have a huge merb clientele . But outside of merb as well people book. As far as euphoria goes i highly doubt its gonna close all of a sudden . They still have girls on schedule , some times havent changed today but yea . Will see what happens i guess

All publicity is good publicity. There's no such thing as bad publicity. There is only one thing in the world worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about.

 

[Lunaseraphim]

Of course, but the logic is that if we simply give every provider and client lethal injection as deterrence or better yet, lock up every woman in a room in their father or husband’s home and only allow women outside escorted by family, there would be no harm from prostitution as there would be no prostitution. We all know there is no prostitution in Saudi Arabia because of protective laws like these. I think science could solve this problem. We simply need to eliminate the female gender altogether and develop an artificial surrogacy womb for reproduction. Then all men will have the freedom to walk around unencumbered by the female gaze shirtless and oiled up.

No, the logic is that conservative men want to benefit from prostitution but they don't want prostitutes to have any agency and they want us to be punished and have nowhere to go. People like Donald Trump made Fosta Sesta happen, and we all know he is a rapist and a pedophile and probably has seen a number of sex workers in his life. Even on this board a lot of men display conservative values and if you read through this thread I've already seen a lot of statements that are derogatory towards sex workers here alone.

They also want it to seem like they are catering to ''good christian values'', by encouraging women to be ''traditional wives'', and by punishing anyone who strays from that. In the United States, historically, sex workers have been convicted far more often than clients. Even here, street workers reported being constantly harassed by the police in the 90's and 2000's because they ''disturb the public''.

This isn't about wanting to prevent men from wanting to have sex with women.. it's about control of what women are supposed to do, and how they are allowed to make money. All those women who choose to do sex work instead of cheap labor, are not doing the cheap labor. They are ''out of control''

 

[Crazylixx88]

No, the logic is that conservative men want to benefit from prostitution but they don't want prostitutes to have any agency. People like Donald Trump made Fosta Sesta happen, and we all know he is a rapist and a pedophile and probably has seen a number of sex workers in his life. Even on this board a lot of men display conservative values and if you read through this thread I've already seen a lot of statements that are derogatory towards sex workers here alone.

They also want it to seem like they are catering to ''good christian values'', by encouraging women to be ''traditional wives'', and by punishing anyone who strays from that. In the United States, historically, sex workers have been convicted far more often than clients. Even here, street workers reported being constantly harassed by the police in the 90's and 2000's because they ''disturb the public''. This isn't about wanting to prevent men from wanting to have sex with women..

Why do you always attack “ christian values” but never say “ muslim values “ or “jewish values” i remember why i ignore these women on this forum. All phoneys .

 

[CLOUD 500]

No, the logic is that conservative men want to benefit from prostitution but they don't want prostitutes to have any agency. People like Donald Trump made Fosta Sesta happen, and we all know he is a rapist and a pedophile and probably has seen a number of sex workers in his life. Even on this board a lot of men display conservative values and if you read through this thread I've already seen a lot of statements that are derogatory towards sex workers here alone.

They also want it to seem like they are catering to ''good christian values'', by encouraging women to be ''traditional wives'', and by punishing anyone who strays from that. In the United States, historically, sex workers have been convicted far more often than clients. Even here, street workers reported being constantly harassed by the police in the 90's and 2000's because they ''disturb the public''. This isn't about wanting to prevent men from wanting to have sex with women..

They do that to cater to their voter base. They will do what the voters want. They only care to be relected.

You're mentioning the racial restrictions because it personally affects you. But don't you think these restrictions are in place because agencies aren't losing too much money from them? I have no idea if all girls want to give all GFE acronyms but from what I had heard, they are mandatory at agencies. If that isn't true, well, maybe I'm wrong.. But from what people I know who worked for agencies told me, you actually have to give a full GFE service at an agency, to every client. That is what is expected. Also, these types of restrictions are specific to the sex industry.

I just read one girl on Euphoria's website has a new addition restrictions, no DFK. First time I see this. So it seems agencies give the girls a lot of leeway.

As a black or brown client, you are not prioritized by these employers and you also suffer discrimination. They could focus on hiring more girls who don't have racial restrictions... but they don't do that, because from my perspective, another type of client is kept in mind.All we can do is hear what people say about their work places.. And i also don't think the experience is the same for everyone. I'm talking about how I currently enjoy working for a MP, but some people would never do that and they prefer working at an agency by far. You just can't take what one individual person says and apply it to everyone in the industry, you have to have a honest conversation with multiple individuals.

The majority of the client base is White so if they got girls who refuse to see Black or Brown clients it will not affect their bottom line.