Hello all,
Il sera plus facile de repondre en anglais, donc excusez-moi s'il vous plait.
It's all a matter of personal taste regarding attraction so it's completely understandable when a guy isn't attracted to a certain type. Still I don't understand why there's any need to degrade anyone based on physical type. Okay, it's your opinion (figuratively speaking, not in reference to anything Booker said) she's too masculine, but why degrade this type or any type as a woman? Why isn't she a woman? Because someone feels uncomfortable about how a woman looks? I've seen people make the same degrading remarks when the lady is very small, flat-chested, or having other characteristics they find very unappealing such as a lack of curves. I don't understand how there's any justification for that kind of reaction, what sometimes seems like some people feeling threatened by something different than how they think things should be. Why? Just a thought.
BTW: There aren't many voters but it's very nice to see such a solid positive response overall.
Cheers,
Merlot
Thank you! I'm so glad that you said this! It warms my heart when men have the same opinion as me haha, because I just come off as biased.
I'm not sure if OP was saying this about SPs or civilian women, but if the latter, then your point is even more valid. And for the SPs who fall into this "masculine" category, then leave them for the other men who appreciate that.
Kudos Merlot!