My 1h is $50 more than my 1h30 and yet, people still book 1h. Sometimes the “lower rates for longer periods” don’t work
Wait... you saying its actually 50$ less to get 90 minutes instead of 60 and peoples still book 60 only? I mean not only the extra 90 is free but on top of that its 50 less?
*check ads, yup
I noticed 2h is also 700 ... so only 50 more than an hour. I guess at that small difference i would also go for 2h personally. But i noticed based on the price structure that its clearly made to entice peoples to go for more than 1h. I assume its a recent change cause i could swear not that long ago it was not 650 for 1h. But i guess that goes back to the OP's idea that some providers prefer 2h+ and therefore make their rate to entice it.
Independant providers are driven by 2 things ... First is what suits them, second is what draw business. The good ol supply and demand. Im sure in a perfect provider world for most of them they would only offer 4h+ dinner dates at premium price. But would the demand be enough to be sustainable? Probably not for most.
As for the other part of the conversation ... social time or not ... well here is my 2 cents
In a perfect world where i would be rich i would totally book 3-4h minimum. Because yeah its better on a lot of aspect. It create more chemistry and make things more organic. BUT sadly in my situation, and im sure lots of other clients situation, it simply is not realistic. Ultimately im self-aware i pay for intimacy... thats the point of booking a provider. And in most cases 1h is enough to have a good intimate session. I mean a little bit of social time in there like intro, shower if incall etc, but also a solid 40m that can be spend on action. If i was rich, the kind of rich where you simply don't care to throw money left and right, then of course i wouldn't mind to pay for social time. I would even be the kind of guy to pay sessions to other peoples and throw big parties and so on like i said before. Its easy to be generous when you have more than you need.
But in my situation and the current world, where every $ matter, i simply can't see myself putting money on a "conversation" or social time, call it as you prefer. Even when meeting celebrities at Comiccon or such, in the end while the interaction is cool and does matter on the general impression of said celebrity, ultimately we pay for the photo op/autograph. A "tangible item" you get to keep.
This idea can be applied to anything in life. When i go to Montreal would i prefer to sleep at a 5 star hotel with a pool inside and other luxury things? Yes ! But i don't have 500-600+ to put on "1 night in a hotel", so i book a modest hotel for 100$ or less ... So ultimately its kinda the same thing when i see providers. I prefer booking 6 times a year 1h and have 6x intimacy rather than book 2x 3h ... I imagine this can even be translated to clients who book once a week... maybe ultimately they prefer seeing an escort one time a week rather than 1 time every 2 week... so they take the 1h.
On a side note ... I even done this a few times where in 1 trip to Montreal i see 2 providers for 1h each, sometimes same day, one in the afternoon and one in the evening, other times one on arrival day, and one before leaving for home. Its more fun to me than 1 single 2h meeting. Gives me time to fully recharge and build anticipation again. When i would do this, usually i would book 1 provider i seen before and 1 that is totally new. That way i feel safer ill have at least one great time and its a good mix of the pleasure of meeting someone you know and discovering a new person.
So in conclusion yes obviously its important the SP is nice, friendly, that she has that "social skill" because thats what start the whole thing. But after 6-7m of talks im hoping she initiate intimacy because its easier for me and ultimately thats why im there.
Anyway there is no right or wrong in that ... its a matter of perspective. Some clients do look for company before intimacy. But in my case ill fully admit i am looking for intimacy first.
