I always find this to be kind of interesting. The monger destination thread made me thing of it again. When I do anything locally if I consult MERB then the information I find tends to be girl specific. That's also generally the most useful information here. If I travel girl specific information is utterly useless, and what I want is information on locales and price trends. The question comes up as to where to get your information and how reliable is the information you get?
When I look at information I'm generally getting information from people I don't know personally, so without knowing them or their tastes I need to decide if I'm going to place any faith in what they tell me. In my case I've found that longevity on a board doesn't necessarily impart said poster with intelligence or good sense, so I can't always take stuff at face value just because of seniority. The sum volume of post content taken as a whole may be an indicator, or a similar viewpoint of an SP or MP may be an indicator of shared tastes as well. A perfectly reasonable and intelligent poster may have a completely different sense of what constitutes good looks, good service, etc etc, which is completely at odds with what I believe. That doesn't mean they're wrong, just that we're misaligned in terms of taste. Some people, to call a spade a spade, are simply buffoons. In others, and especially on this board, there's a certain amount of pandering and/or lack of candor that may make taking info at face value problematic.
So, how do you guys decide whether information is pertinent and correct when you're reading board posts, and how much stock do you put in reviews in general?
When I look at information I'm generally getting information from people I don't know personally, so without knowing them or their tastes I need to decide if I'm going to place any faith in what they tell me. In my case I've found that longevity on a board doesn't necessarily impart said poster with intelligence or good sense, so I can't always take stuff at face value just because of seniority. The sum volume of post content taken as a whole may be an indicator, or a similar viewpoint of an SP or MP may be an indicator of shared tastes as well. A perfectly reasonable and intelligent poster may have a completely different sense of what constitutes good looks, good service, etc etc, which is completely at odds with what I believe. That doesn't mean they're wrong, just that we're misaligned in terms of taste. Some people, to call a spade a spade, are simply buffoons. In others, and especially on this board, there's a certain amount of pandering and/or lack of candor that may make taking info at face value problematic.
So, how do you guys decide whether information is pertinent and correct when you're reading board posts, and how much stock do you put in reviews in general?