It is sometimes healthy to be skeptical about reviews especially by posters who are either prolific or review only ladies at one agency. Years ago there was a certain poster who became somewhat legendary, even a board hero, for monster blasts of reviews on his trips to Montreal, in which he would see 4 or 5 ladies a day and review them all, producing maybe 20-25 reviews per trip. A few things later became common knowledge.
One was that he had a discounts for reviews deal going with one agency. When asked privately about this, he defended the arrangement, saying all of his reviews were honest, he fluffed nothing and accepted a discount in return. He also said the agency was specifically told he would call it as he saw it. He later openly stated as much on MERB after a gaggle of criticism of his reviews.
The other thing that later became common knowledge was that he was a very large man and enjoyed giving the ladies he saw a "good pounding", and he tended to be more favorable towards those who didn't complain about the pounding and took it like "good soldiers."
Although I met the poster in question and genuinely liked him as a person, I really didn't trust his reviews. For one thing I imagined that some of the women didn't like being pounded by a huge dude, especially the small and petite ones. Another thing I learned just from talking to him was that he was obsessed with getting good deals in almost everything he did in life. He would openly brag about great deals he swung through Priceline bidding and on cellphone packages. He one time described to me copiously researching cellphone packages and finding one that saved him what he believed was a lot of money. As he described it to me, I swear he had this look on his face like King Kong on the top of the Empire State Building, and he suddenly and violently thumped his chest with a closed fist. I almost laughed out loud- it was pretty funny. But that was his personality.
And I think that it carried over with seeking escort deals and writing reviews as a part of those deals. My sense was that when he said the reviews were "honest", they were to a certain extent, but I do believe that he emphasized the positives or went out of his way to, and de-emphasized the negatives or mentioned them in passing. Or so it seemed to me.
Once his "arrangement" was admitted and out in the open, the Mods at the time allowed the reviews because there was candor about the circumstances under which they were written.
This all dates 20 years back now. Do such arrangements exist in 2025? Probably they do with less candor about them. So it's another thing to consider especially with seemingly prolific reviewers.
View attachment 86935