SexyNadya said:
Nothing to do with this thread, I know! Maybe too much money invested on the website? I made a poll a while ago about what customers like in terms of website. The consensus was to keep it simple but effective. Personally, I've never visited Nadia's site because, when it takes over 15 seconds to see anything and even longer to see something useful, I close the window and go elsewhere.
Now back on topic: If an agency owner claim all it's staff is high class, why use pictures that were snatched from elsewhere? Maybe investing in photo sessions would be more productive than investing in heavy, slow, high animation website?
In my opinion, this combination of website and snatched pictures is the equivalent of a Ferrari body with a Yaris engine: useless.
The owner have quality staff, the owner just have to show us his staff, not somebody else's staff.
An acceptable digital camera is worth less than $200 and a Jaccusi room at Chablis is also cheap. You get the girls in there one by one or all together and click away for 4 hours!
