Tough call!
Just-ass-weet[QUOTE said:
]A go with the flow session, ``oh, I don`t do that`` is rarely uttered and when it must be, it is done is such a playful manner that you don`t notice it. GFE to me is not a menu of ABCs and therefore has no extra charge (jeepers!)... at the same time, if the opportunity to kiss is not available (the guy has a cold or something - give me some space here) or you don`t get around to MSOG, or maybe was not what the guy wanted, or DATY didn`t happen..
.
This is a tough topic. Maybe we should look at why the issue ever came up. Just for the sake of argument I am going to play Devil`s advocate and deliberately put the hobby into the cold light, of reality discuss the darker side of the hobby. If you feel I am being negative, so be it.
Issues of misleading promises by agencies and/or sp`s, restrictions, and unequal treatment of clients by some sp`s (for example, differences between the level of service at the beginning and at the end of a long shift), are the most likely culprits that come to mind.
First, it is no secret that some agencies offer great prices with great looking girls (sexyxxx comes to mind) failing to mention that when the client arrives he is informed by the young lady in question of a long list of extras. Or that the service is completely safe, safe meaning that any surfaces which contact must be able to accept a condom or forget it. Several on the zzcream roster were notorious for that. Agencies and sp`s pulling all kinds of stunts bordering on misrepresentation, in my mind, are partly responsible for fueling this debate. Bait and switch stunts are bad enough without this stuff. Reviews and black lists do help the potential client. Too bad they are necessary.
Second, the concept of YMMV. There are some serious issues here. Unscrupulous sp`s can have a field day with this term. They are pretty savvy sometimes at sizing up who they are dealing with. If it is all about money then just how far can we push the envelope. Very tempting at the end of a long shift. This is a lot like real life. Nice guys finish last sometimes, even here. Should the level of service be left to the discretion of the sp? In all fairness there are two things arguing against abuses. First, the sp`s with integrity, (Anik, Ronnie and Jessy, for example) I believe, would not engage in this. I wish they were all like this. Second, word gets around and this kind of behaviour does show up in reviews. But not everyone reads this board or participates. Some just try to con us after the fact. We have all read some of the colourful exchanges between agency owners and clients on this board.
So what is wrong with all of this you ask? Well concepts like extras, restrictions and YMMV have the potential to put a barrier between sp and client which, despite all of the efforts at sociability of the sp, will leave a taste of rejection in the mouth. No guy likes to feel like a fugitive from a leper colony. And please don`t hit me with the “I keep that part for myself, something I only share with a loved one.” I can`t think of anything more intimate than intercourse, period.
Does the system, for the most part, work as it is now. Well you have all read the reviews. Judge for yourself. In my opinion I think it does. MOst guys are understanding of sp`s, indeed will even make excuses for them for a bad performance. But the very fact that the debate even exists lends credence to the fact that there should be a system in place where, first, an sp can declare herself YMMV or GFE and second, the level of service which might universally be expected for each of these designations is clear. You can bet that it would result in fewer arguments on this board. Just my two cents.
