The issue isn't about shaming them for looking for and liking legal aged young ladies. The issue comes in when they are looking to compare them to children as opposed to ladies. When someone in review refers to the SP as appearing pubescent/underage.There is nothing weird about a hobbyist having a preference for an escort who is of legal age. Why should a man be ashamed if he wants to book solely with escorts in the 18-25 age range?
And thinking someone who is 18-25 is more attractive is in the eye of the beholder, and just something society trys to force on us. Just because you find so doesn't make it fact. There are many people who look better as they get older, they need maturing to grow into their features.There is no denying that on average younger adults (both men and women) are more attractive than their older counterparts. Agencies and spas know this and that is why they skew the providers age ranges on the younger side.
Have you not been paying attention to today's plastic surgery trends? Most beauty standards are to remove the youthful look, the chubby cheeked baby faces (18), and replace it with the sunken in aged cheeks of a matured look of around (30). Even makeup trends are to try and mimick the natural look of a healthy 30yro with all that contouring that hides the youthful persons face. Put a 20yro, and 40yro model side by side with glam makeup from a makeup artist, and you will have trouble telling either of their age. They will look like they are the same age.





