I have a question concerning providers posting in review threads. Here are two very recent contradictory decisions regarding this rule:
This question can only be answered by the Mods. However, I believe this is an important issue for all members to aware of, which is why I am posting it here instead of sending a PM to the Mods. My question is:
Under what circumstances is it important "to get both sides of the situation" and under what circumstances is it cut and dried - "providers can't post in review threads"?
My position is that it is always important to get both sides of the situation. However, like they say, "you can't fight city hall". Thus, I'm not campaigning to have the rules changed. I'm just asking a simple question.
Mod 11 said:I am letting the reminder of the post to stay because I believe it's important to get both sides of the situation.
Mod 11 said:I deleted XXXXX's post since providers can't post in review threads.
This question can only be answered by the Mods. However, I believe this is an important issue for all members to aware of, which is why I am posting it here instead of sending a PM to the Mods. My question is:
Under what circumstances is it important "to get both sides of the situation" and under what circumstances is it cut and dried - "providers can't post in review threads"?
My position is that it is always important to get both sides of the situation. However, like they say, "you can't fight city hall". Thus, I'm not campaigning to have the rules changed. I'm just asking a simple question.