Not really... What I am seeing more and more on this board are overly analytical or even obsessive personalities. This thread is a good exampleThe op is touched by the 'tism I think
Not really... What I am seeing more and more on this board are overly analytical or even obsessive personalities. This thread is a good exampleThe op is touched by the 'tism I think
Although I haven't read the entire thread, nobody seems to recall that such a system was instituted and used by poster "Robin" over 20 years ago. As I recall Robin provided a thread and a link to his own compendium of reviews.And it was allowed by the Moderators. Robin was EXTREMELY prolific and (apparently) a straight shooter.In addition to reviews, I wonder if it would be technically possible to have a star rating system to accompany the review because unless you start reading each review for an SP it’s hard to know the general impression first glance
whereas if every time you wrote a review you could include a star rating from 0 to 5 which would add up like you can see in Google review well at least you could already have a general idea of how many reviews are positive and how many aren’t.
It’s just in order to have some form of unified rating system for everyone
How is this still onlineDo a search and you will find his intellectual property, which is now dated and worthless.
MCTJ - awesome job finding this!!!! You ask a great question!!!!
I seem to recall using his spreadsheet as a jumping off point. I think it was his anyway.Although I haven't read the entire thread, nobody seems to recall that such a system was instituted and used by poster "Robin" over 20 years ago. As I recall Robin provided a thread and a link to his own compendium of reviews.And it was allowed by the Moderators. Robin was EXTREMELY prolific and (apparently) a straight shooter.
There was a pioneer and his name was Robin.
Who don't have time to read a review. Reading is the only way you can get an idea and make your own.because unless you start reading each review for an SP it’s hard to know the general impression first glance.
But this doesn't tell anything. You may answer yes because it's your first experience with an SP and everything would have work.Actually, the contribution of different viewpoints made me rethink my suggestion to something more specific.
with every review, it would be required to answer Yes or No to the question “Repeat ?”
What is this idea wanting a binary choice? Human relations are much more than that.it could very well be a binary system color coded where reviews are either good (green) or bad (red) so you already know ahead of time what you’re looking at.
This!!! This is so important. Even now, in a lot of review threads details that can already be found in the ads are shared and asked for, too.Looking for a star system like this is desiged for the same type of person who contacts us and asks us to repeat all the details in our ads because they don't want to take the time to open the ad and read the details for themselves.
It is better to read and properly educate yourself rather then trying to cut even more corners when booking someone.
Not really... What I am seeing more and more on this board are overly analytical or even obsessive personalities. This thread is a good example
If he was he'd have better pattern recognition skills and compassion for other people who are constantly judged![]()
Wait, can you explain what you mean here? I want to know what specifically makes you think OP is autistic
I find it entertaining that a simple suggestion turned me into the main subject. Apparently, offering an idea people disagree with is enough to question someone’s mental state.The op is touched by the 'tism I think.
Thank you very much for the informative and constructive answer and will definitely do the search.Do a search and you will find his intellectual property, which is now dated and worthless
I agree that it was really inappropriate to question your mental state but your suggestion shows a lack of compassion for providers.. you're also speaking in our name by saying ''this would be better for us'', but you didn't listen to any of our opinions. I think this is why people are reacting the way they are.I find it entertaining that a simple suggestion turned me into the main subject. Apparently, offering an idea people disagree with is enough to question someone’s mental state.
Some throwing around terms like ‘autistic’ as if that’s a punchline. It’s wild how quickly a conversation shifts from the topic at hand to scrutinizing the person behind a suggestion.
The inability to debate ideas without attacking someone personally is honestly more telling than anything I said.
You don't need to do a search as your colleague MCTJ found and posted Robin's compendium of reviews. See post #63. It brought back memories of some of the ladies I also saw, like Porcha and Allyson of Satin Dreamz. It also reminded me that Robin really liked Rebeka Anderson of FKS. For those who don't remember FKS, it was a self described "consortium of indies", although it was seemingly operated as an HDH agency. It may have been a hybrid with attributes of both an agency and a consortium of indies. But they advertised as the latter.Thank you very much for the informative and constructive answer and will definitely do the search.
As for "repeat : yes or no" that's also irrelevant considering how often we read things like "she was perfect in every way but I won't repeat because I like variety". Again, people struggle with comprehending simple concepts and I wouldn't expect an idiot to understand that the question is "worth repeating?," and not "will you for sure repeat?"
All of those ideas suck.