Um, perhaps you should read the opening comment by SD themselves. They asked for comments.
My puzzlement stemmed not from the FACT of the comments, but whether the comments related to a comparison to SD's predecessor websites (which never impressed me and were never the strength of the agency) or, alternatively, its modern competitors like Devilish or Girls On Fire that have a sleeker, modernized look.
Everyone seemed to be acting like SD invented the cheesy website when the fact of the matter is that they have had an above average agency with a below average website for years, a historical trend that not a single poster in this thread, not even you who intimately knows their history, ever mentioned. On this issue the historical perspective is paramount. I approach these issues from a completely historical perspective, knowing the agency's past record on website design and past record on customer service and quality control.
Obviously the consensus is that the current website is cheesy but none of the predecessor websites were very impressive either, in relation to their contemporaries through the years. I do not believe Peter or his various minions ever had any strength in the area of web design, and to all of a sudden act as though Peter is somehow disappointing his customers with the new website is, in my view, to ignore the long history of this agency and others Peter has operated through the years, which simply were never viewed as beacons or revolutionaries in the venue of escort agency website design.
All of the agencies, like baseball teams, have their strengths and weaknesses. Web design was NEVER an area in which this agency excelled.
