So I know that there have been some changes to Canadian laws regarding prostitution in Canada. As with most laws, it seems only those with law degrees have a hope of understanding them. My understanding is that SP are allowed to advertise themselves but not explicitly equate money with sexual services. Purchasing sexual services from a SP is illegal whenever the SP receives financial compensation for those same services. Am I right so far?
So if an individual was to contact a SP and arrange a meeting in a safe, agreed upon location for the purpose of a "massage" no law has yet been broken as no financial exchange for sex has taken part. Not a discussion about such an exchange. Once at the SP's location, $XXX was given for the massage, still nothing illegal has occured. Correct? If during the massage the SP is told she's attractive and the client would love to see her without her clothes, still nothing illegal has happened because there has been no discussion regarding the paying of $$$ and the removal of her clothes. If the client mentions some sexual things they enjoy there is still no discussion of $$$ then it's just sexual acts between consenting adults. Am I correct?
At the end of it all, no discussion was ever made about $$$ and sex. The only time $$$ was involved was for a massage. A legal transaction. Anything else was just between adults. Now we all know that what I'm talking about is splitting hairs. If I pay $350 for a massage and then happen to mention I'd love a bbbj it's obviously not accidental. The question I have is, is it legal? Stretching it I know but is it still within the bounds of the law?
So if an individual was to contact a SP and arrange a meeting in a safe, agreed upon location for the purpose of a "massage" no law has yet been broken as no financial exchange for sex has taken part. Not a discussion about such an exchange. Once at the SP's location, $XXX was given for the massage, still nothing illegal has occured. Correct? If during the massage the SP is told she's attractive and the client would love to see her without her clothes, still nothing illegal has happened because there has been no discussion regarding the paying of $$$ and the removal of her clothes. If the client mentions some sexual things they enjoy there is still no discussion of $$$ then it's just sexual acts between consenting adults. Am I correct?
At the end of it all, no discussion was ever made about $$$ and sex. The only time $$$ was involved was for a massage. A legal transaction. Anything else was just between adults. Now we all know that what I'm talking about is splitting hairs. If I pay $350 for a massage and then happen to mention I'd love a bbbj it's obviously not accidental. The question I have is, is it legal? Stretching it I know but is it still within the bounds of the law?