How NHL salary cap has distorted hockey
by Steve Simmons, The Toronto Sun
Jonathan Toews has been a huge factor on three Stanley Cup championship teams in Chicago and a gold-medal leader on two Canadian Olympic teams.
And yet how is he perceived, at the age of 30, in a hockey world gone mad by salary cap numbers?
As a diminishing asset, that’s how.
One with five years remaining on a contract that takes up $10.5 million in salary cap room for the Blackhawks.
His last Olympic medal came in 2014, the last Cup in Chicago was won in 2015. Toews is signed through to the 2023 season. If it’s a bad deal now, it becomes even worse over time.
Toews has been one of the real treasures in the NHL. A natural leader. A natural winner. With a resume of success few can match.
But in this summer of figuring what the Maple Leafs will have to pay for Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner and William Nylander, none of whom have hit their prime yet, the distortion doesn’t come now, necessarily, it comes later.
We don’t judge players on how they perform anymore. Now we match performance to size and length of contract and can’t seem to view a player for who he is and what he does without referencing his pay grade.
It is the unfortunate teeter-totter of professional sports. We play general manager from home. We talk more about money than about the game.
The salary cap has certainly helped the business of hockey but it has hurt players and forever altered and twisted the relationship with calculator happy fans.
How the NHL cap has distorted hockey