cheap people wanting content for free or prefer paying a dude who steals content instead of the actual content creator.What’s a leak?
If only they paid some dude.... They don't want to pay anything. It's sad that someone wouldn't want to compensate someone for the work they do.cheap people wanting content for free or prefer paying a dude who steals content instead of the actual content creator.
i buy some new onlyfan babe this sarturday and this morning my credit card i been hack
It’s the Uber-isation of wanking; the logical conclusion to markets eating the world. Instead of monetising a spare room or a Prius you monetise your selfies.
OnlyFans have benefited massively from the coronavirus crisis. Search activity has doubled since the lockdown, and according to Alexa, their traffic has surged.
Even before the pandemic they were growing rapidly. They paid £641k corporation tax in 2018, which at an effective tax rate of 15% implies 2018 revenues of around £4m, or $5.5m. Today in 2020, their top users alone make this much money through their site.
With a couple of assumptions, it’s easy to estimate their yearly revenue today. And oh god is it big.
In 2019, they had over 60,000 content creators and 7m registered users. Extrapolating from the Google growth trends, it’s safe to say they have at least 10m users today. I calculated the average revenue per creator per month (about $250) and the average subscription fee (about $8.7) from my scraped data. Applying the 20% commission and assuming only half the users and creators are active, we end up with a lower bound of $90m, and an upper bound of $104m.
That’s an annual growth rate of between 304% and 334%. Absolute nuts.
The revenue of content creators follows a classic power law distribution. The top accounts make something like $100,000 a month (these aren’t in my sample). The median account makes $180 a month.
The top 1% of accounts make 33% of all the money. The top 10% of accounts make 73% of all the money. This isn’t the 80:20 rule; it’s the 80:14 rule.
The standard way to measure inequality of an economy is with a Gini Index. An index of 0 implies a communist utopia, a value of 1 implies a single greedy capitalist owns all the wealth. The Gini index of OnlyFans is 0.83. The most unequal society in the world, South Africa, has a Gini index of 0.68. OnlyFans is less equal than an ex-apartheid state.
OnlyFans is so unequal because chancers make accounts with zero fans, while big Instagram stars take their following with them. A large proportion of accounts have no fans at all, and the lion’s share of fans are shared by the top accounts.
If more girls are using OnlyFans these days, does that mean they're more open to making explicit content?
OnlyFans: quick, easy money?
This is a question I ask myself.
Can someone explain to me what Onlyfans is all about? Is it a place for gilrs to sell views of themselves and uses by SPs and Sugar Babies to promote themselves?