This made me lol Guys, this literally doesn't mean anything whatsoever lol
I guarantee you have been with women heavier than that but you had no clue & assumed they weighed less. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those women you claim were 140, genuinely weighed between 100-115lbs.
A height/weight range like that can include so many
variations of bodies to begin with. If on top of that same weight/height can look completely different on different people or even on the same person depending on muscle VS fat and body composition. - it's completely meaningless.
Women carry weight differently and muscle isn't weightless so it's not an accurate way to predict someone's appearance. It's not easy even for another woman to guess another woman's weight and it's even less accurate when men try.
Most men simply do not understand weight on women.
If 2 women with the exact same weight and height can look totally different, then imagine the variances for 5"0 to 5"7 weighing 100-115lbs Lol
Just for fun, try different measurements etc on these weights/heights:
http://bodyvisualizer.net/
I'm assuming the very small range for weight is meant to narrow down to a pretty specific preference. In which case, you should go by the type of body/shape you find attracting instead of weight because that is meaningless and not at all helpful to determine what you find attractive.
My guess is you already go by that based on pictures, so the weight isn't actually relevant if the person looks like their picture. xo
She's very tall, granted, but she is smoking hot and weighs 210lbs. Like she says, men never guess she weighs that much. There are tons of examples from the range OP posted and there are sooo many variations!
View attachment 38993
5"1 & 138lbs:
View attachment 38995
5'8 & 175lbs
View attachment 38996
Outside OP weight range?
View attachment 38997