What's your SP criteria?
- Thread starter Skym
- Start date
1 - 5ft5 or smaller (the spinnier the better!)
2 - within my age range (older is fine by a couple years)
3 - dfk
4 - natural preferred
5 - CIM minimum
6 - healthy weight, probably 100-130 depending on height and built etc
7 - lack of penis
2 - within my age range (older is fine by a couple years)
3 - dfk
4 - natural preferred
5 - CIM minimum
6 - healthy weight, probably 100-130 depending on height and built etc
7 - lack of penis
- age: teens or 20s
- spinner body type (shorter the better)
- open to foot fetish stuff (with small, attractive feet)
- CIM, COF or C on feet w her willing to lick it or play w it a bit
- daty/dato
Likes but not needs:
-open to domination (either dominant or submissive)
- Dato on me
- role play
- spinner body type (shorter the better)
- open to foot fetish stuff (with small, attractive feet)
- CIM, COF or C on feet w her willing to lick it or play w it a bit
- daty/dato
Likes but not needs:
-open to domination (either dominant or submissive)
- Dato on me
- role play
This made me lol Guys, this literally doesn't mean anything whatsoever lol
I guarantee you have been with women heavier than that but you had no clue & assumed they weighed less. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those women you claim were 140, genuinely weighed between 100-115lbs.
A height/weight range like that can include so many variations of bodies to begin with. If on top of that same weight/height can look completely different on different people or even on the same person depending on muscle VS fat and body composition. - it's completely meaningless.
Women carry weight differently and muscle isn't weightless so it's not an accurate way to predict someone's appearance. It's not easy even for another woman to guess another woman's weight and it's even less accurate when men try.
Most men simply do not understand weight on women.
If 2 women with the exact same weight and height can look totally different, then imagine the variances for 5"0 to 5"7 weighing 100-115lbs LolJust for fun, try different measurements etc on these weights/heights: http://bodyvisualizer.net/
I'm assuming the very small range for weight is meant to narrow down to a pretty specific preference. In which case, you should go by the type of body/shape you find attracting instead of weight because that is meaningless and not at all helpful to determine what you find attractive.
My guess is you already go by that based on pictures, so the weight isn't actually relevant if the person looks like their picture. xo
She's very tall, granted, but she is smoking hot and weighs 210lbs. Like she says, men never guess she weighs that much. There are tons of examples from the range OP posted and there are sooo many variations!
5"1 & 138lbs:
5'8 & 175lbs
Outside OP weight range?
Last edited:
I guess we are dealing with a new norm. Resistance is futile. You guys have your criteria and is quite understandable. Yet we all know that these SP advertisements like age and weight are taken with a grain of salt. So say you see what you like online and you book. She shows up and it is her but heavier and/or older but attractive of course. You are horny and got Viagara in your system. Whatcha gonna do?
Okay now my question is is that her belly button or her twat? I can’t tell. Well at least it’s shaved.
Okay now my question is is that her belly button or her twat? I can’t tell. Well at least it’s shaved.
Last edited:
Anyways, someone’s lying about not liking fat/BBW women. My text messages tell me so. There’s not one of these posts claiming they like BBW women, when In fact I have a more regular clientele than my thinner friends.This made me lol Guys, this literally doesn't mean anything whatsoever lol
I guarantee you have been with women heavier than that but you had no clue & assumed they weighed less. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those women you claim were 140, genuinely weighed between 100-115lbs.
A height/weight range like that can include so many variations of bodies to begin with. If on top of that same weight/height can look completely different on different people or even on the same person depending on muscle VS fat and body composition. - it's completely meaningless.
Women carry weight differently and muscle isn't weightless so it's not an accurate way to predict someone's appearance. It's not easy even for another woman to guess another woman's weight and it's even less accurate when men try.
Most men simply do not understand weight on women.
Just for fun, try different measurements etc on these weights/heights: http://bodyvisualizer.net/
I'm assuming the very small range for weight is meant to narrow down to a pretty specific preference. In which case, you should go by the type of body/shape you find attracting instead of weight because that is meaningless and not at all helpful to determine what you find attractive.
My guess is you already go by that based on pictures, so the weight isn't actually relevant if the person looks like their picture. xo
She's very tall, granted, but she is smoking hot and weighs 210lbs. Like she says, men never guess she weighs that much. There are tons of examples from the range OP posted and there are sooo many variations!
View attachment 38993
5"1 & 138lbs:
View attachment 38995
5'8 & 175lbs
View attachment 38996
Outside OP weight range?
View attachment 38997
Merb members are just a different demographic. I didn't go through all the posts, I got stuck on replying to the 2nd one lol but I wouldn't expect much variety in the answers. Don't take it personally.
It's never been representative of clients in general and won't be any time soon. Too much fatphobia & lack of knowledge among men. Those who do prefer bbw know to just keep it to themselves because there's a subset of men who take it as an invitation to give their super uninformed, unsolicited take on bbw and fatphobic reasons for finding bbw unattractive blah. blah.. It almost never fails.
So personally, I'm perfectly fine with having no mention of it all. You and I both know there is plenty of demand for bbw, mature and SP's who do not fit the image of conventional beauty dictated by current standards or whatever. I've heard the same take enough times to not really need to hear it again. For some people it's unimaginable that anyone might have different preferences than their own.
Don't sweat it. It better this way.
Criteria #1: Chemistry
If a SP can make most guys feel like they’ve had a “special connection” with her, sign me up. It’s pretty much the best sign that she is both smart enough to read her different clients and that she genuinely loves what she does enough to actually adapt to them. Does that guarantee you’ll have chemistry together? Nope. But it’s your best bet to have a memorable session!
Criteria #2: Challenge
If a SP has been known to be a bit YMMV, it’s an instant turn on for me. I like that. Actually, no: I LOVE that! It instantly makes me want to go the extra mile: I’ll read up on what she likes, shop a bit for the date, prepare a playlist, show up clean shaved and smelling like sandalwood and just generally try to sweep her off her feet. Does it work? Oh yeah! Does it always work? Well, no… but almost!
As for services required, age, height, weight and other physical preferences… I find that variety is the spice of life! Some of the most surprising and memorable bookings I’ve had over the years were with girls that had little to do with my “idéal féminin”. Besides, aren’t exploration and discovery the biggest selling points of this whole hobby?!?
If a SP can make most guys feel like they’ve had a “special connection” with her, sign me up. It’s pretty much the best sign that she is both smart enough to read her different clients and that she genuinely loves what she does enough to actually adapt to them. Does that guarantee you’ll have chemistry together? Nope. But it’s your best bet to have a memorable session!
Criteria #2: Challenge
If a SP has been known to be a bit YMMV, it’s an instant turn on for me. I like that. Actually, no: I LOVE that! It instantly makes me want to go the extra mile: I’ll read up on what she likes, shop a bit for the date, prepare a playlist, show up clean shaved and smelling like sandalwood and just generally try to sweep her off her feet. Does it work? Oh yeah! Does it always work? Well, no… but almost!
As for services required, age, height, weight and other physical preferences… I find that variety is the spice of life! Some of the most surprising and memorable bookings I’ve had over the years were with girls that had little to do with my “idéal féminin”. Besides, aren’t exploration and discovery the biggest selling points of this whole hobby?!?
Women I never thought of ever hitting my radar were the most extraordinary encounters. Frederique of MSC, Naomi of SD, Emmanuelle of MGF (especially her), Angelic of Eleganza.
But I can say that pounds are all relative. I mean I don't do fat chics so that is established. If you are 5'3" and 150 lbs no you don't even register. Now if you are 7 feet tall and 150 lbs with legs for days I book you. Ha ha.
i never said it was most people's criteria it's just what I like most that's what the thread is asking don't take it personalThis made me lol Guys, this literally doesn't mean anything whatsoever lol
I guarantee you have been with women heavier than that but you had no clue & assumed they weighed less. I wouldn't be surprised if some of those women you claim were 140, genuinely weighed between 100-115lbs.
A height/weight range like that can include so many variations of bodies to begin with. If on top of that same weight/height can look completely different on different people or even on the same person depending on muscle VS fat and body composition. - it's completely meaningless.
Women carry weight differently and muscle isn't weightless so it's not an accurate way to predict someone's appearance. It's not easy even for another woman to guess another woman's weight and it's even less accurate when men try.
Most men simply do not understand weight on women.
Just for fun, try different measurements etc on these weights/heights: http://bodyvisualizer.net/
I'm assuming the very small range for weight is meant to narrow down to a pretty specific preference. In which case, you should go by the type of body/shape you find attracting instead of weight because that is meaningless and not at all helpful to determine what you find attractive.
My guess is you already go by that based on pictures, so the weight isn't actually relevant if the person looks like their picture. xo
She's very tall, granted, but she is smoking hot and weighs 210lbs. Like she says, men never guess she weighs that much. There are tons of examples from the range OP posted and there are sooo many variations!
View attachment 38993
5"1 & 138lbs:
View attachment 38995
5'8 & 175lbs
View attachment 38996
Outside OP weight range?
View attachment 38997
Neither did I say that. I'm confused how you understood that I was saying that? Not at all what I was writing. I didn't take anything personal. That's literally the advice I gave on another post that was unrelated to yours or my response to it. Lol
In my response to yours, I said weight/height as only physical criteria are not useful in identifying your preference. 1) because weight/height looks different on people and 2) this means it's very difficult to tell someone's weight etc... I think you misunderstood what I wrote. xo
Last edited:
I like a girl with a nice hour glass figure with curves in the right places not a spinner or BBW.
Dark long hair about 5’4 to 5’9 weight in proportion to her height and curves I am not going to weigh her lol.
Pretty face and a great rear end.
Now having said that there are a number of spinners I have seen and one particular BBW that I would love to see so yes I have a specific taste but sometimes just a pretty face or a unique feature or red hair will catch my eye and then that Is the girl that I would like to see.
I guess in reality I can be attracted to any gorgeous girl no matter the height colour of her skin or hair I think probably the only ones that are a turn off are the ones that are obese or the ones that can’t put a sentence together without using fuck or insist on calling me babe, I call ladies by their name and I have one also.
Dark long hair about 5’4 to 5’9 weight in proportion to her height and curves I am not going to weigh her lol.
Pretty face and a great rear end.
Now having said that there are a number of spinners I have seen and one particular BBW that I would love to see so yes I have a specific taste but sometimes just a pretty face or a unique feature or red hair will catch my eye and then that Is the girl that I would like to see.
I guess in reality I can be attracted to any gorgeous girl no matter the height colour of her skin or hair I think probably the only ones that are a turn off are the ones that are obese or the ones that can’t put a sentence together without using fuck or insist on calling me babe, I call ladies by their name and I have one also.
my perfect SP: 5'5 or below. 100-135 lbs. white girls only. cute face. 34B or bigger. a nice fat ass on a slim waist. 18-25. CIM. DFK. top level BBBJ skills and can go for 20 minutes+. good dirty talk
i never imagined i would care for dirty talk but... there was one SP I saw that said the right shit at the right time that really got me off and i realized that was a very rare skill.
i never imagined i would care for dirty talk but... there was one SP I saw that said the right shit at the right time that really got me off and i realized that was a very rare skill.
1) 18-21 yo
2) Quebecois
3) body-weight-height in proportion, not fat
4) no boobie implants
5) no beef curtains LOL
Over time...my criteria has changed...
In my new criteria...I want a SP that likes to roleplay lol
In my new criteria...I want a SP that likes to roleplay lol
You gotta explain and expand on this one. This is a total deviation on your preference of ass eating.
Role Play? Nurse? Schoolgirl? You want her show up painted in green from head to toe as an Orion sex slave from Star Trek?
Similar threads
