Shane looked great... I wasn't kidding about wanting her to come out of retirement, even if it was only for one scene I haven't seen Ginger, Amber, Brianna, or Christy in a really long time, but I understand Christy did a cumback scene relatively recently. I did see Ginger make an appearance in some indy movie a year or two ago. She did look older, but Ginger will always be my one of my ATF's and I'll continue to lust after her even when she's 90. I'm not into memorabilia, but there's a reason I still have a shirt she gave me back in the 90's.Shane must be in her forties by now. I wonder how she held up over time? Older pornstars i used to like such as Ginger Lynn, Amber Lynn, Chasey Laine & Brianna Banks didn’t age very well. Christy Cannon still looks good, though!
I still remember watching some of Shane & Seymore’s videos with my ex. I loved the one they made in Ottawa & another one with the fireman which caused a scandal at the time. That’s what gave my ex & I the idea to start doing our own gonzo porn at the time (mid to late 90’s). We’d watch their movies to give us some ideas & we then started to bring our videocamera on trips with us & film ourselves having sex in strange places incl. in public like inside a movie theatre, on a beach or in a public bathroom. We even booked a room at the Chateau Laurier in Ottawa once & tried to re-make our own scenes like Shane, Seymore, TT Boy & Tiffany Towers. I even contacted Tiffany Towers (who lived in Ottawa at the time) & asked if she’d be interested in participating in our movie (a friend of mine knew her from the same gym they attended) but she was away in LA at the time. Good times!
I’ve met & been with the both of them. None of the current girls do anything for me. I’m more into the first & second wave of girls that entered the Quebec porn scene. The only recent ones i can think of that caught my eye were Shana Lane when she first entered the business (and i have met her) & Hanna Page when she first came onto the scene. I’ve always had a thing for a more natural & innocent look instead of the cosmetic surgery/covered with tatoos types we see too often today. That’s why i still much prefer watching decades-old porn. It’s not that I’m nostalgic. It’s just that they are more my types of women & the porn back then didn’t seem as staged & as fake as it is today. Which is why gonzo porn was always my favorite to watch & try. Today i still enjoy casting videos (Pierre Woodman’s stuff is great!) but unfortunately my favorite series (Girls do Porn) were driven out of business years ago. Backroom Casting Couch (BCC) i liked at one time but lost its appeal. One of my all time favorite videos ever is the Libby Hawkenson video. It’s such a tragedy that she only made one video! Back when it first came out i think i would have married that girl! LolBack on topic, another of my ATF pornstars is Canada's own Sweet Amylee. Shot her (and Cherry Potter) a lifetime ago in Montreal and had a crush on her ever since. But It wasn't until many years later that she made my dreams come true... <3
Cherry and I had good chemistry, it's like the camera wasn't there. Amylee more so, but maybe because we had unfinished business, Either way, she was particularly sweet. I kind of understand what you mean, but I haven't really met many girls as ex-porn/porn escorts and I've only met a small handful of Canadian talent. My personal tastes tend to run towards natural and innocent-ish, but there are always some notable exceptions with a few tats here and there and some occasional augmentation. And I'm very fortunate to choose who I shoot and work with most of the time. I do like some casting videos, but mostly when I'm doing the casting, lol. If you like natural, innocent, and Woodman, check out Bonnie Dolce, Barbie Brill, and Liz Ocean (with me at least, the same on and off camera... a rarity). I've shot (with) all three (like Woodman, except I think Stone did Barbie)... all sexy and fun in their own ways. And all natural beauties from Budapest. It is getting harder and harder to find non-tatted, natural girls these days.I’ve met & been with the both of them. None of the current girls do anything for me. I’m more into the first & second wave of girls that entered the Quebec porn scene. The only recent ones i can think of that caught my eye were Shana Lane when she first entered the business (and i have met her) & Hanna Page when she first came onto the scene. I’ve always had a thing for a more natural & innocent look instead of the cosmetic surgery/covered with tatoos types we see too often today. That’s why i still much prefer watching decades-old porn. It’s not that I’m nostalgic. It’s just that they are more my types of women & the porn back then didn’t seem as staged & as fake as it is today. Which is why gonzo porn was always my favorite to watch & try. Today i still enjoy casting videos (Pierre Woodman’s stuff is great!) but unfortunately my favorite series (Girls do Porn) were driven out of business years ago. Backroom Casting Couch (BCC) i liked at one time but lost its appeal. One of my all time favorite videos ever is the Libby Hawkenson video. It’s such a tragedy that she only made one video! Back when it first cAame out i think i would have married that girl! Lol
I’m curious about something & you’re the perfect person to ask. Have you noticed that once you’re used to performing in front of the camera it gets more difficult to get turned on when there is no camera or audience around?My personal tastes tend to run towards natural and innocent-ish, but there are always some notable exceptions with a few tats here and there and some occasional augmentation. And I'm very fortunate to choose who I shoot and work with most of the time. I do like some casting videos, but mostly when I'm doing the casting, lol. If you like natural, innocent, and Woodman, check out Bonnie Dolce, Barbie Brill, and Liz Ocean (with me at least, the same on and off camera... a rarity). I've shot (with) all three (like Woodman, except I think Stone did Barbie)... all sexy and fun in their own ways. And all natural beauties from Budapest. It is getting harder and harder to find non-tatted, natural girls these days.
100% agreeAnd all natural beauties from Budapest. It is getting harder and harder to find non-tatted, natural girls these days.
I actually might not be the right person to ask as I rarely perform in front of an audience. Often my sets are very intimate, and we may be the only ones in the room. As I'm sure you know, reality porn is almost never reality... but I do endeavor to keep is at real as possible. And therein lies part of the rub (lol)... the performers have to open up to the camera to give the best and sexiest view, but it is not always the most comfortable or most pleasurable. This may not be as big of an issue for girnormous black guys who may be bruising the girls' cervix and still have another few inches before they can fit all of it in, lol. The best sex whether PS or GF is when (there is a natural chemistry and) when it's just the two of you (or a couple of her friends ), and I kind of look at the camera (person or tripod/POV) as a third person to whom you're trying to be an exhibitionist, so to speak. So for me, I'm more turned on when there is no camera or I can forget the camera is there (thought I can not do this and hope to capture anything good).I’m curious about something & you’re the perfect person to ask. Have you noticed that once you’re used to performing in front of the camera it gets more difficult to get turned on when there is no camera or audience around?is
Interesting. I totally get what you mean about the natural chemistry thing & upon reflection i totally agree. Nothing beats strong chemistry whether performing in front of the camera or not. Myself i used to believe that the camera made me perform better. However i learned that when the chemistry isn’t there then camera or not the performance & the product will often be inferior. I’ve also tended to treat the camera like a third person…a voyeur. My partner(s) & i have quite often even spoken to the camera or gestured toward it like it was a person in the room. Reading what you wrote regarding teasing when the camera isn’t on i found somewhat annoying when i’d get turned on since we would get carried away & would have to take a momentary pause to go & turn the camera on. I mean…wait at least until the camera is rolling, right? Finally for me i haven’t always followed my rule about ignoring the camera however i’ve tried my best to in order to provide the best viewing angles. I’ve found there’s nothing more frustrating to see during the editing process of being in a position (bbbj, 69, fucking, etc) for too long when the angle is bad or being in a great scene with a grest angle but this scene or position not being long enough to enjoy. It makes a potentially great product simply a good one. I’ve used two cameras at times but it simply made the editing process more complicated than anything.The best sex whether PS or GF is when (there is a natural chemistry and) when it's just the two of you (or a couple of her friends ), and I kind of look at the camera (person or tripod/POV) as a third person to whom you're trying to be an exhibitionist, so to speak. So for me, I'm more turned on when there is no camera or I can forget the camera is there (thought I can not do this and hope to capture anything good).
My difficulty in getting turned on is when I'm reminded (usually by poor performance) that she is only there because she is paid to be. Fortunately, I rarely get those, but when I do, I'm thinking. "Bitch, I don't need you to fake an orgasm, but can you at least not trample on my fragile ego, and pretend you want to be here, at least when the camera is on??" lol Conversely, the magic happens when she teases you or even fucks you when the camera isn't on or kisses you passionately and holds on to you long after the scene is over. My philosophy is that I only need to fall in love a couple of hours at a time, but those are the ones that steal a little bit of your head and your heart, and I've used those (rare) moments as mental viagra on days I'm not feeling strong.
You are better off keeping the camera(s)... memory cards are cheap. If anything, you will have some extra BTS or blooper footage. If you shoot with two cameras, use different angles and punch in with one camera. A long clip can be broken up with a cutaway to a tighter shot from the other camera. Sure, two cameras is more work, but it may be the difference between a scene to which you want others to rub one out vs. a glorified sex tape to which only you might pleasure yourself when your partner has a headache, lol.Interesting. I totally get what you mean about the natural chemistry thing & upon reflection i totally agree. Nothing beats strong chemistry whether performing in front of the camera or not. Myself i used to believe that the camera made me perform better. However i learned that when the chemistry isn’t there then camera or not the performance & the product will often be inferior. I’ve also tended to treat the camera like a third person…a voyeur. My partner(s) & i have quite often even spoken to the camera or gestured toward it like it was a person in the room. Reading what you wrote regarding teasing when the camera isn’t on i found somewhat annoying when i’d get turned on since we would get carried away & would have to take a momentary pause to go & turn the camera on. I mean…wait at least until the camera is rolling, right? Finally for me i haven’t always followed my rule about ignoring the camera however i’ve tried my best to in order to provide the best viewing angles. I’ve found there’s nothing more frustrating to see during the editing process of being in a position (bbbj, 69, fucking, etc) for too long when the angle is bad or being in a great scene with a grest angle but this scene or position not being long enough to enjoy. It makes a potentially great product simply a good one. I’ve used two cameras at times but it simply made the editing process more complicated n anything.
I do... unfortunately, I never had the opportunity to work with her, and I'm not sure she does privates. Every now and then, my stupid WOKE right hand identifies as Foxy's vagina, and I get to fuck "her" to my heart's contentSomeone remember Foxy Di, I wonder if she is cool, singles? Does she meet. People just for money or instagram story? I might now remember a scene with her pink underwear with a sunrise or sunshine in a summer maybe? .
i decided to check out these three ladies & OMG are they my type! Especially Barbie Brill! I’ve always had a thing for eastern european pornstars & Hungarians & Czechs are among my favorites!If you like natural, innocent, and Woodman, check out Bonnie Dolce, Barbie Brill, and Liz Ocean (with me at least, the same on and off camera... a rarity). I've shot (with) all three (like Woodman, except I think Stone did Barbie)... all sexy and fun in their own ways. And all natural beauties from Budapest. It is getting harder and harder to find non-tatted, natural girls these days.
I’m not a big fan of POV scenes. I’m also not a fan of closeups. I prefer watching two fully nude bodies pleasuring one another during a sex scene. I’m also not much of a fan of lingerie or stockings. Not a fan of guys wearing t-shirts or hats during a sex scene. I’ve always preferred watching a sex scene when the lovers are all fully nude. I am in full agreement with you that filming POV requires more work & takes away from the full experience, as you put it, for the reasons mentioned. However i have used this filming technique in the past also but mostly for anal scenes in order to validate to the person viewing the film that there is no doubt which part of the anatomy is involved & which would at times difficult to see from a regular camera angle. The main reason why i’m not a fan of filming these types of scenes is that the camera always shakes during intercourse & makes it somewhat irritating to view. However filming & watching it in POV is enjoyable to both film & watch if the scene involves fellatio. Holding a camera while lying down, sitting or standing up requires much less exertion & with the pulse rate being considerably lower any possible shaking of the camera is neutralized. It adds to the overall shoot.Filming a POV is work and takes away from the full experience. You're doing two things at a time fucking and filming. There's been times I toss the camera and just get down to business. Though the vids are always fun to watch afterwards !
True. You are right about the shaking of camera and breaks between action. As long as the facial is good thats all that matters.I’m not a big fan of POV scenes. I’m also not a fan of closeups. I prefer watching two fully nude bodies pleasuring one another during a sex scene. I’m also not much of a fan of lingerie or stockings. Not a fan of guys wearing t-shirts or hats during a sex scene. I’ve always preferred watching a sex scene when the lovers are all fully nude. I am in full agreement with you that filming POV requires more work & takes away from the full experience, as you put it, for the reasons mentioned. However i have used this filming technique in the past also but mostly for anal scenes in order to validate to the person viewing the film that there is no doubt which part of the anatomy is involved & which would at times difficult to see from a regular camera angle. The main reason why i’m not a fan of filming these types of scenes is that the camera always shakes during intercourse & makes it somewhat irritating to view. However filming & watching it in POV is enjoyable to both film & watch if the scene involves fellatio. Holding a camera while lying down, sitting or standing up requires much less exertion & with the pulse rate being considerably lower any possible shaking of the camera is neutralized. It adds to the overall shoot.
I’m not a big fan of POV scenes. I’m also not a fan of closeups. I prefer watching two fully nude bodies pleasuring one another during a sex scene. I’m also not much of a fan of lingerie or stockings. Not a fan of guys wearing t-shirts or hats during a sex scene. I’ve always preferred watching a sex scene when the lovers are all fully nude. I am in full agreement with you that filming POV requires more work & takes away from the full experience, as you put it, for the reasons mentioned. However i have used this filming technique in the past also but mostly for anal scenes in order to validate to the person viewing the film that there is no doubt which part of the anatomy is involved & which would at times difficult to see from a regular camera angle. The main reason why i’m not a fan of filming these types of scenes is that the camera always shakes during intercourse & makes it somewhat irritating to view. However filming & watching it in POV is enjoyable to both film & watch if the scene involves fellatio. Holding a camera while lying down, sitting or standing up requires much less exertion & with the pulse rate being considerably lower any possible shaking of the camera is neutralized. It adds to the overall shoot.
Even the latest generation phones shoot 4K and are quite good at reducing camera shake. 120P for the pop evenTrue. You are right about the shaking of camera and breaks between action. As long as the facial is good thats all that matters.
Good to know. I am tech inept ...Even the latest generation phones shoot 4K and are quite good at reducing camera shake. 120P for the pop even
More important that you know how to use you dick than the camera anyways lolGood to know. I am tech inept ...