It seems, because i help out a few people with their websites, every time I post something even remotely critical of another escort, my motives are questioned.
Walk with me, let's logic this through, shall we?
Let's say it is true for the sake of argument: I slam other escorts with the intent of assisting those with whom I am associated.
First off, the slam would have to have a deleterious effect on the slammee, to the extent that a certain number of men would not book her. That is represented as 'X'.
Secondly, a rough estimate says there are perhaps 2,000 women working as sex service providers (massage, agency and indies) in this city at any time. Let us call that 'Y'.
Of those 2,000 women, I happen to assist with web presence for two of them. 0.1% of all working escorts.
Then there is their availability. A guess would be 20 hours per week.
So the assumption is, all things being equal, that were i to slam an escort, let's say 5 men would not book her, but take their choice from among the remaining 2000 other women who provide sex services, of which I am associated with 0.1%, and who have a constraint on their time.
X x 5 / Y=.1. As best as I can figure it, that would be a .02% increase in revenues. At $250/hour tht works out to less than half a cent.
Please correct my math or logic if incorrect.
Oh, I should mention since I have no dog in this fight, no personal gain at all to make, doing what it has been insinuated and stated outright that I do makes even less sense than doing so given the above. Perhaps this quote helps to clarify why this is happening "We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are".
Walk with me, let's logic this through, shall we?
Let's say it is true for the sake of argument: I slam other escorts with the intent of assisting those with whom I am associated.
First off, the slam would have to have a deleterious effect on the slammee, to the extent that a certain number of men would not book her. That is represented as 'X'.
Secondly, a rough estimate says there are perhaps 2,000 women working as sex service providers (massage, agency and indies) in this city at any time. Let us call that 'Y'.
Of those 2,000 women, I happen to assist with web presence for two of them. 0.1% of all working escorts.
Then there is their availability. A guess would be 20 hours per week.
So the assumption is, all things being equal, that were i to slam an escort, let's say 5 men would not book her, but take their choice from among the remaining 2000 other women who provide sex services, of which I am associated with 0.1%, and who have a constraint on their time.
X x 5 / Y=.1. As best as I can figure it, that would be a .02% increase in revenues. At $250/hour tht works out to less than half a cent.
Please correct my math or logic if incorrect.
Oh, I should mention since I have no dog in this fight, no personal gain at all to make, doing what it has been insinuated and stated outright that I do makes even less sense than doing so given the above. Perhaps this quote helps to clarify why this is happening "We don't see things as they are, we see things as we are".
Last edited: