A dominatrix recently lost the warrant (correction: I meant custudy) of her 5 y/o kid. Te judge declared that the services provided by her do not convey good, positive, values, that her working place is not far from her home and that she has open face photographs on her Internet site. She had said during the trial that she is able to make a clear demarcation between her professional life and her private life. We do not know any other details in the case. http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/q...adomasochiste-perd-la-garde-de-son-enfant.php
In the case before the Supreme Court now (they accepted to hear it two days ago) one of the 3 women, Tery-Jean Bedford, is a dominatrix. The inferior courts have all agreed that prostitution and domination are legal trades in Canada.
Don’t you think that the judge went too far ? That he could have orderred that what seems to be the problem (seperation between home and work place and photos on Internet) simply be fixed ?
In the case before the Supreme Court now (they accepted to hear it two days ago) one of the 3 women, Tery-Jean Bedford, is a dominatrix. The inferior courts have all agreed that prostitution and domination are legal trades in Canada.
Don’t you think that the judge went too far ? That he could have orderred that what seems to be the problem (seperation between home and work place and photos on Internet) simply be fixed ?