Extras? New category listed on Profiles of Euphoriagirls

[Jordd]

This is sketchy to list. Directly tying payment to explicit services.

Would not want police to get hands on texts in which you are requesting specific sexual services in exchange for cash. Agencies are getting too bold.

These are escort agencies and not MPs. In Montreal they operate out in the open, their websites are accessible to anyone, charges are on the websites and the police probably know all the incall locations as well. I wouldn't wprry about my phone, this isn't Boston.

It’s legal to offer/advertise sexual services, it’s illegal to solicit services. Go figure.

 

[Jordd]

At least I think it's new as I just noticed it on many profiles on Euphoria's site. Some profiles have no mention of 'Extras', some profiles have 'Extras: No', some profiles have 'Extras: (like CIM, COF, Greek, etc with $ amount for each extra), and some profiles list the extras with the disclaimer "at her discretion". I appreciate Euphoria trying to give us more info recently like tattoos and now extras to make a more informed choice. The thing is I've read reviews in the past of SPs providing some of these extras (like CIM) and now those same SPs have "No" next to the Extras category in their profile. Any insights?

Love it. Transparency. It doesn’t mean that the noextras sps won’t do it, but rather to not expect it imo. Conversely, the ones advertising are free to wave the charges, for example for good clients, longer appointments, etc.
But I don’t think clients should share these details unless the provider agrees.

 

[Giselle Montreal]

It’s legal to offer/advertise sexual services, it’s illegal to solicit services. Go figure.

And criminal to buy them. But we can sell them as we want, we're seen as "vicitims". As long as there are no minors, violence, drugs or arms involved, law enforcement is leaving us alone.

 

[puss1985]

smart move. bravo

 

[hob12]

On another note, did you guys notice greek went from 100 to 150 pretty much everywhere?

 

[WC3000]

I have no issue with Euphoria listing out these extras prices. These particular services (CIM, CIMSW) have always cost extra.

 

[anatomy]

I have no issue with Euphoria listing out these extras prices. These particular services (CIM, CIMSW) have always cost extra.

Not true, only in the past few months from my experience.

 

[urquell]

Like any business, the more you can make charging for smaller services a regular thing, the more you will do it. Perhaps at some point, there will be "Smiling: $50"

100%. It's only getting progressively worse as things go along, and once a fee gets entrenched and people get comfortable and used to it then they take the next step and introduce new fees. Death of a thousand cuts, happening an inch at a time. It's like airline luggage and service fees. This trend towards wholesale a la carte pricing utterly destroys any immersion a guy might have in the encounter, IMHO. Perhaps it bothers others less, who haven't had to go through as much of the progression. IDK. I do know that it's why most of the guys I know who travel say they never monger at home anymore except as a "tide-me-over" until they can get out of Dodge again. That and pricing, of course.

 

[urquell]

I have no issue with Euphoria listing out these extras prices. These particular services (CIM, CIMSW) have always cost extra.

No, they haven't.

 

[talkinghead]

I agree with @TheJames101 and @urquell. I enjoy talking, which I know isn't every escort's thing; will that become an extra? And not to pile on or dig out, but I also wonder if establishing a list of extras with considerable surcharges protects the agency's escorts (clients know what they're getting in advance) or encourages them to do things they might otherwise be uncomfortable with. In any case, it seems clear that most people out here are in favor, although I think it's tacky.

 

[Jordd]

I agree with @TheJames101 and @urquell. I enjoy talking, which I know isn't every escort's thing; will that become an extra? And not to pile on or dig out, but I also wonder if establishing a list of extras with considerable surcharges protects the agency's escorts (clients know what they're getting in advance) or encourages them to do things they might otherwise be uncomfortable with. In any case, it seems clear that most people out here are in favor, although I think it's tacky.

I think it’s both. So it’s a double-edged sword.
Honestly, I prefer when things happen “organically” and we go with the flow. I’ve rarely had a discussion about “options” or money for that matter. Maybe I have low expectations! lol

 

[IamNY]

I think it’s both. So it’s a double-edged sword.
Honestly, I prefer when things happen “organically” and we go with the flow. I’ve rarely had a discussion about “options” or money for that matter. Maybe I have low expectations! lol

I go about this the same way. I’m a visual person so if the SP is visually attractive to me I go about my business. If something was to happen naturally or “organically” then it’s just a bonus. I’m not like everybody and I guess some of us need the acronyms spelled out before hand. That’s just never been my thing and it’s kind of a turn off.