I can't tell if you're happy you would get a discount for a smaller size or upset you would get charged more for being too large.
Random thoughts: What’s on your mind lately? Part 2
- Thread starter LC18
- Start date
It's actually a lot of work. I always tell myself when I see a professional at work who looks doing his/her job easily the amount of preparation, experience (it could be years or decades), concentration behind the scene.
We most of the time take it for granted or take shortcuts in our analysis on services.
I always try to let providers know when there is a mistake in their ad like if they have the wrong number or like with one provider in Vancouver she didn't know she could put contact info on her tryst ad. Most clients don't have a tryst account. Way easier to put her number and email on there. Of course I said this in a nice way. Most clients who give advice don't really know what they're talking about. I've only seen someone have the wrong number on their ad once.
Funny you mention that. There is one in particular that says openly that she refuses bbbj for uncut men! Another one refuses below 5 inches! Just for the record I’m not concerned by the 2. It sucks nonetheless!
The dick size will not concern you, you are there to cuddle with the sp's cat while talking.
I wasn't saying SP should offer discounts just explaining why some of us do it from time to time. Offering a discount doesn't encourage anyone to spend more, unless it's a discount on something more expensive specifically.
I'm certainly not planning on asking for people's dick size before booking them, and I don't think anyone I know is, either. I'm not sure if you're making this comment because you're implying that people offer discounts to avoid working hard.
I guess if someone charges affordable rates that's a way to avoid working, and so is charging a lot. Thanks for informing me of this, I wasn't aware.
I don't really understand what's the connection between my comment and SP discriminating based on dick size and whether someone is circumcised or not.. I don't understand why a SP would do this, it's discriminatory and obviously we have to adapt to different shapes and sizes
My suggestion of having lower rates for longer bookings isn't the same as having a discount and if you just want to book an hour so be it. There are also clients who do want to fuck the whole time during a 90 min or 2 hour booking, by the way. So this isn't a tactic to "work less hard".
I'm also not saying "raise your hourly rate or remove hour long booking entirely" but I feel like this is what was understood lol in fact I wouldn't currently advise someone to remove hour long bookings or to raise their rates too much because they won't have a lot of clients particularly at certain times of the year.
Last edited:
I don't bring my cats to my incall to avoid working by distracting clients lol I just thought the photo was cute. These conversations are really absurd.
For years I believed that in the song <Don't Shoot Shotgun> from Def Leppard the lyrics were ...and my Senseï say keep away... instead of "my senses say" I was like ok good advice.
Last edited:
It’s actually less work for more $$$ when SPs enforce a 2-hour minimum “social date” before getting down to business - which, let’s be real, 99% of the time this business involves no pants.
Also not saying social dates aren’t work for us either, however, the majority of clients aren’t out here dying to chat about your favourite wine or your star sign for two hours before getting to the part where pants come off. Forcing this setup as the new standard is less about client needs and more about ego or trying to weed out people who can't afford your inflated minimums. Which is also fine - just don’t dress it up like it’s a revolutionary business model when it’s really just gatekeeping access under the guise of “class”.
Enfin du temps frais, mon dieu ça fait du bien après cette série de jours où on se sentait comme dans un four. Profitez bien de votre week-end et soyez prudents!
I sat, fingers crossed, hoping 'pics of my kitten' was a euphemism before I clicked to the next page. Can't say I'm disappointed tho...
It wasn't but I can assure you I don't remain fully clothed during bookings lol I was hoping sharing something cute and wholesome would lower tensions here but it clearly didn't work.I sat, fingers crossed, hoping 'pics of my kitten' was a euphemism before I clicked to the next page. Can't say I'm disappointed tho...
But I'm not talking about enforcing a 2 hour minimum social date, I'm talking about charging less for longer bookings. That's a completely different concept.
Example:
30 minutes 200$
1h 300$
90 mins 400$
2 hours 500$
Does this make sense?
Clients will obviously not book for 2 hours to talk the whole time. When you have different options you're not enforcing anything, you're just giving options, like on your website. (Which is really well designed by the way)
Like I said earlier, if a provider asked me for advice on how to be independent, I would never advise she has a 2 hour minimum and charges a super high rate. She won't have clients. The providers who do this have been around for a while and probably have regulars they see at older rates and for shorter periods of time. I also don't have the intention of doing this myself. I also would never tell a new provider ''oh by the way when you get sessions over an hour the clients will just talk the whole time until the last 10 minutes'' lol that's just not the truth...
Also, you're right. None of the tactics that high end providers use are ''revolutionary business models''.. they have been around for a while, and some clients are perfectly fine with it. A lot aren't which is understandable, most people can't afford to see a luxury provider.. but reality is most of us will remain somewhere in the middle or have to work for lower rates, so it's not hurting anyone that there are providers with these types of business models.
Last edited:
Yes it does make sense!
I was just talking about the minimum 2H requirements or social settings before anything even starts. And thank you for the compliment hahaha I went all out.
Bluesky is where the wokes go and cannot handle the truth.
True say and not to mention booking two hours with a SP first time is very risky. You just never know if it will be good and by reading her recent reviews she is clearly YMMV. I like to book for one hour first time is no good at least the damage is minimized. For sure I will go elsewhere.
True and it sounds good but I am talking about a first time booking it should not be two hours. The one hour rate is very reasonable for a first time booking. It is to test the waters on if it will be good or not especially when a SP is clearly YMMV. Of course if good then the 90/2hr rate is very good but only if it were good. Of course those that already got a long line of regulars got no incentives to have one hour appointments.
Similar threads
