Canadian sex worker says she doesn’t take brown men as clients.
Restrictions
Comments are depressing ...
Restrictions
Comments are depressing ...
How Can an Escort Tell your Ethnicity?
- Thread starter overfiend
- Start date
Indian bashing seems to be the norm and they do not even defend themselves against all this hate.
Had a session with an SP from an established agency that knew me. I’m of mixed background, more to the light brown hue but grew up western. Always dress well , good hygiene, trimmed , fresh breath. The vibe with the SP was “ off” as soon as I entered, she towered over me with her heels, lol. My little head took control but it was the worst experience, so maybe if they substitute “no brown” for Indian , it would have saved an uncomfortable unsatisfying , encounter. But if you’re mixed where do you end up classifying??
Best to avoid. Indians are a victim of stereotypes. Cannot change what they think. I think it will get worse and worse.
I have read that in Thailand, Indians have developed a negative stereotype only recently resulting in Thai providers not willing to see them. Given the close proximity of Thailand to India, there is large influx of Indian tourists. The problematic issue is that it is very typical for Indians wanting to excessively haggle, attempt to renegotiate agreed upon rates or wanting to get a deal in every transaction. So Thai providers can exhaust themselves in negotiations or suddenly find multiple men for a single booking with all the men wanting to share the cost. From what I've seen in Canada, the negative views are more based on negative views on immigration with the influx of recent Indian migrants and the whole idea that Indians are taking all the jobs at Tim Hortons and such. Either that or there's a belief that Indians have worse hygiene or look more lower class diminishing the perceived self-value of the provider.
This is hypocritical when I've heard from (agency) providers in Montreal that they have seen local French men who were drunk or others who would just send the client to the shower again until hygiene was acceptable, but not deny even a obvious homeless man who shows up at the door.
It's also interesting as because I've been watching some interviews from "courtesans" from legal brothels in Nevada in the US and it seems that every customer involves a negotiation. If the girl likes you or thinks you are attractive or are in the mood, their rate lowers. If the girl is very popular, is tired or doesn't want to see you, your rate rises dramatically. Outside that scenario, it seems most providers are aggressively firm on their set rates.
This is hypocritical when I've heard from (agency) providers in Montreal that they have seen local French men who were drunk or others who would just send the client to the shower again until hygiene was acceptable, but not deny even a obvious homeless man who shows up at the door.
It's also interesting as because I've been watching some interviews from "courtesans" from legal brothels in Nevada in the US and it seems that every customer involves a negotiation. If the girl likes you or thinks you are attractive or are in the mood, their rate lowers. If the girl is very popular, is tired or doesn't want to see you, your rate rises dramatically. Outside that scenario, it seems most providers are aggressively firm on their set rates.
Last edited:
Well each SP has her own reasons. It seems in her experience those were the ones restricted. She didn't have that much issue with the ones you mentioned.
In the case of the SP being interviewed, her rationale is based on the high proportion (9 out of 10) showing the same behavior and she doesn't want to play Russian roulette to get the 1 out of 10 being "normal".
She ended the interview by saying that it was a before/when she started situation. But now with different rates and screening process in place she will reconsider them.
Rationale here is is it's supposed to decrease the risk drastically.
I hate these threads with every bone in my body.
1 out of 10 of every white man that contacts me is "normal" and respectful, the rest get ignored or blocked. It's just part of what I deal with every day.
1 out of 10 of every white man that contacts me is "normal" and respectful, the rest get ignored or blocked. It's just part of what I deal with every day.
For an agency like Euphoria, which has an excellent, well maintained, informative web site, the process is straightforward.
- You rely on the "ethnic" clients reading the detailed descriptions of the girls and if the client sees a "No" for blacks and/or Indians then he uses common sense and doesn't ask to see a girl with ethnic restrictions.
- When a client calls and engages the booker in conversation about who is available or which girl he would like to see, the booker can often identify the client's ethnicity and then the booker only offers him girls with no ethnic restrictions.
- If a client of a certain ethnicity gets past these hurdles and books a session with a girl who has restrictions, then the girl makes a final decision on whether to proceed with the session when she meets the guy. It's entirely possible that her decision is based on circumstances such as the looks/appearance of the client, his dress, his manner of speaking etc. There's nothing to stop a girl from making exceptions to her normal restrictions. My guess is that few clients ever get refused unless they are obviously drunk or disorderly in behavior or appearance.
Also, after checking Euphoria's website, there aren't that many girls with any restrictions, so it's just not a big deal.
The "race restriction" threads do serve one purpose though. It gives everyone a chance, especially the indy escorts who have no race restriction, to publicly declare how "anti-racist" they are and thus make themselves feel more virtuous than those awful agency girls.
Last edited:
I thought the "race restriction" threads were for certain clients to say "her body, her choice" for the first and last time in their lives.
I guess many of us get to feel more virtuous than those awful others.
I’ve always been respectful, clean and never bargained, slightly to the timid side. Unfortunately got a thing for Arab providers , most of which at Euphoria, do not want Indian, even if mixed. Just curious what the reasons are , is it attitude , smell ( spices), color ? Maybe if it’s behavior , something can be modified. Sigh.
Some individuals are deeply biased against certain populations and nothing can change their minds, many reasons can be involved, but most common one are stupidity or lack of education.
It’s seems to me that you are not doing anything wrong and it is not worth torturing yourself about it.
Really? What about the interview shared here?
It's just too many bad experiences with individuals that lead to a blanket ban.
It sucks but you can only blame the bad apples in the basket.
I also agree with that in general and her reasons might be valid too, at the end of the day it sucks, OHenry was asking what can be done to change it , not much and its not really worth the energy , just see another SP and move on
I watched the video and I think she is full of shit, and perpetrating racist stereotypes. I genuinely feel bad for her because I experienced all the things she is talking about, but not "only with brown men"
We all have a different client base depending on where we live, which area of the city, what platforms we advertise on, what our body type and look is.. When I started, I had similar conditions that she is describing in the video. I was new, I had no idea what I was doing, I had low rates and didn't know how to set boundaries properly. I attracted all the behaviors she named in the video, EXCEPT it was from men of ALL races. And honestly, it happened more with white and east asian men, because they were more entitled and privileged. It has to do with starting in the industry in certain conditions, not having clients of a specific race and ethnic background.
I agree with Michelle and everything else she said. I have not personally noticed a correlation between ethnicity or race and bad behavior. If anything, men who are heavily discriminated against tend to be more afraid of doing something wrong in my experience.
I honestly don't understand the point of generating arguments that are always the same and negative feelings in users. This is what I would call "stirring the pot".. Can we leave these discussions behind once and for all? There was no point in posting this here. The thread on X was already full of debates, there was no point in bringing it here.
Last edited:
I read the post. Like I said I’m act and sound western, just curious if it makes a difference.
I'm not the receiving part. Our advices will be worth not much lol
It's really up to the SP and her decision.
