True and it sounds good but I am talking about a first time booking it should not be two hours. The one hour rate is very reasonable for a first time booking. It is to test the waters on if it will be good or not especially when a SP is clearly YMMV. Of course if good then the 90/2hr rate is very good but only if it were good. Of course those that already got a long line of regulars got no incentives to have one hour appointments.
Random thoughts: What’s on your mind lately? Part 2
- Thread starter LC18
- Start date
There is nothing that would lower tensions beyond some sort of medical intervention but I know multiple providers have said they will start ignoring a specific person. I need to work on making a Montreal data project that's relevant to people like a visualization of data related to hotels.
Not really, sex workers are targeted on X and it's really common that our accounts get suspended. On bluesky that isn't likely to happen. This isn't about being woke.
Also, it's reasonable to not want to book a SP for 2 hours the first time if you don't want to, so the solution to that is finding someone who offers shorter bookings
Most of us offer an hour. Not every SP is going to be the right one for you, and that's fine.. Putting myself in a client's shoes, I wouldn't book a SP who charges 700$ the hour for example.. or who has a 2h minimum that I will end up paying a lot of money for. But that doesn't mean the existence of this SP is a threat to me, there are many options. I think it's fine that some SP want to be selective. I have a 30 minute option and although some people would disagree I think my rates are affordable.. however I don't want to see every client who reaches out.. no SP who commented here would. There are services I don't offer.
I never said that the first time booking should be two hours, I don't understand how anyone read my initial comment that way. I just said ''If you are a SP and want to have longer bookings more often, here is a tactic that works for me...'' I still get plenty of hour long bookings. I wasn't saying ''you girls should stop offering bookings under 2 hours''. I don't understand how my words got twisted like this, and how these suggestions are implying the SP will work less hard. You could have a 2 hour minimum and only get clients who want to fuck the whole 2 hours or most of it.
I think if some SP want to work less often and be more selective about who they see and take less new clients, it's perfectly fine. We all have a life outside of this..
"Bluesky is where the wokes go and cannot handle the truth." try to say "cisgender" or call Elon "cis" on twitter. There are a million ways to get banned on twitter. Elon bans providers also. Bluesky has more freedom than twitter.
Usually when people disagree with you I don't think they actually read what you typed.Not really, sex workers are targeted on X and it's really common that our accounts get suspended. On bluesky that isn't likely to happen. This isn't about being woke.
Also, it's reasonable to not want to book a SP for 2 hours the first time if you don't want to, so the solution to that is finding someone who offers shorter bookings
Most of us offer an hour. Not every SP is going to be the right one for you, and that's fine.. Putting myself in a client's shoes, I wouldn't book a SP who charges 700$ the hour for example.. or who has a 2h minimum that I will end up paying a lot of money for. But that doesn't mean the existence of this SP is a threat to me, there are many options. I think it's fine that some SP want to be selective. I have a 30 minute option and although some people would disagree I think my rates are affordable.. however I don't want to see every client who reaches out.. no SP who commented here would. There are services I don't offer.
I never said that the first time booking should be two hours, I don't understand how anyone read my initial comment that way. I just said ''If you are a SP and want to have longer bookings more often, here is a tactic that works for me...'' I still get plenty of hour long bookings. I wasn't saying ''you girls should stop offering bookings under 2 hours''. I don't understand how my words got twisted like this, and how these suggestions are implying the SP will work less hard. You could have a 2 hour minimum and only get clients who want to fuck the whole 2 hours or most of it.
I think if some SP want to work less often and be more selective about who they see and take less new clients, it's perfectly fine. We all have a life outside of this..
Huh? I never said this. I just offered my two cents. Seems you are putting words in my mouth. I was saying this in a more general sense as some do impose two hours minimum. It is their right obviously as so it is my right to go elsewhere.
I’ve had 30-60 mins options for years, even offered 15 mins. I’ve decided to change my minimum because my personal life doesn’t allow me to do less than that anymore.
It’s only the men that were never going to book the 30-60 mins options that seem to have a problem with my new minimum. It’s only those men sending me messages to ask me if I could still offer those even though they never booked once the 5-6 years I’ve been around.
I have a 4 hours option but it definitely doesn’t have to be 2 hours in public and 2 hours in private. I have always been opened to cooking at my incall or ordering in. I just don’t want to be fucking for 4 hours and I think that’s not too crazy of a request.
Mais bon, tout ça c’est du marketing. Ça fonctionne pour certaines, ça ne fonctionne pas pour d’autres. Ça convient à certains messieurs, ça ne convient pas à d’autres. Chacun y trouve son compte quoi…
It’s only the men that were never going to book the 30-60 mins options that seem to have a problem with my new minimum. It’s only those men sending me messages to ask me if I could still offer those even though they never booked once the 5-6 years I’ve been around.
I have a 4 hours option but it definitely doesn’t have to be 2 hours in public and 2 hours in private. I have always been opened to cooking at my incall or ordering in. I just don’t want to be fucking for 4 hours and I think that’s not too crazy of a request.
Mais bon, tout ça c’est du marketing. Ça fonctionne pour certaines, ça ne fonctionne pas pour d’autres. Ça convient à certains messieurs, ça ne convient pas à d’autres. Chacun y trouve son compte quoi…
Hmm but I am sure exposing the Liberals for the fraud they are on Bluesky would get you banned? I never use cis, this is in the transgender universe. When I say "male" or "female", it means cisgender my default. I like twitter for politics and exposing the Liberals for the fraud they are. But that is another topic.
The way this thread is going I'm about to post my kitten pics just to change the subject lol
It's funny someone accuses you of trying to get everyone to do things one way but you never tried to change anyone else's business. Your business works for you but people act like it's ruining other people's experience. I don't want to get golden showered so I don't book those. I'm never going to say "People shouldn't offer golden shower sessions because me and others don't want that".
Last edited:
You replied to my comment mentioning the 2 hour minimum which wasn't what I was talking about, so I got confused...
sorry I didn't mean to offend you.Probably not. My reason for wanting to use Bluesky is that providers don't get banned on it. You could have an account just to follow providers and not for the political content.
I can say the n word on twitter but can't say cisgender. There are plenty of accounts mocking liberals on bluesky as being left wing doesn't mean being liberal and there is more freedom of speech on blue sky than twitter. But it is true you have more slur availability on twitter than bluesky.
No I am not offended at all. No worries.You replied to my comment mentioning the 2 hour minimum which wasn't what I was talking about, so I got confused...
Probably not.
People have a problem with the idea of it but in reality it doesn't affect them...
I feel like these conversations run around in circles and these arguments are pointless, nobody is gaining anything from it.
Other escorts business model isn't relevant to me. Nobody is imposing anything on me. I wouldn't like it if an escort was telling me to raise my rates or have a 2 hour minimum but nobody is doing this.
I also would never tell an escort to raise her rates or to quit working for an establishment she likes to work for just because I'm indy.. we are all capable of making our own choices.
Last edited:
It's a marketing tactic.
Step 1: claim someone else's business model is frustrating just because it's different.
Step 2: make clients think "Oh she's the good provider trying to get other providers to lower their rates"
Step 3: get the most frugal and anti feminist clients.
Edit: the repetition is key. Repeatedly going after other providers garners attention. It's a circular advertising tactic.
Correct. However, when someone publishes a public blog that imposes on others, they can’t expect to shut people down for having opinions about it.
Lmao. Eh boy. Who said anything about anti feminism? wtf.
Crazy how one-sided it can be eh?!
Pretty much the same feeling people will get from when a business model is imposed onto clients and other SPs.
Shocking!!!!!!! People only praise others and kiss their asses when they agree with them…
Last edited:
How close is Montreal to getting the Expos back in the MLB? I had one of the best weekends of my life last weekend and the only thing I thought was that if I added a daytime major league game in the summer to the mix, I would have reached the summit of the best possible weekend that could exist, ever.
Rates are also marketing tactics. If you keep your rates under 300 you'll have more clients for sure and you'll attract the type of client that is likely to leave reviews.
For instance I have a friend who used to work out of motels and liked to see multiple clients in a row, she charged low for that reason. She lived in a different city from Montreal where client demands are different, and it was convenient for her.
Some clients find it suspicious if a provider charges under a certain rate. A lot of clients don't want to see high volume providers because they think it's risky. So charging above a certain rate can attract these clients.
Technically the lower you charge and the more services you offer the more inquiries you should get, but it can backfire. For instance some clients are turned off by someone who offers cimsw (which I do)..
That's why I strategically choose to keep my rates mid range but offer certain services some don't. I get more types of bookings and clients that way. At least it works for me. I don't really get any complaints.
Choosing to be a lower volume GFE provider doesn't mean you don't want to work hard. It can be a safety issue. Daty is expected.. and most people don't know this but it's the riskiest sexual activity for a woman aside from BBFs. Getting chlamydia or gonorrhea in your throat from giving oral is relatively unlikely to happen unless you did it several times when someone who has the infection. However, if you get daty from someone who has the infection in their throat I think there's a 40 percent chance you'll get it.
One could decide to be a high volume provider who doesn't offer GFE and has a very low rate, but I don't think that'll work out. Even when I charged very low, GFE was expected.
Last edited:
Oh totally. Your marketing tactics are well thought out and I look forward to seeing your business evolve into new forms that make things better for you and clients. It's cool how all of the providers on here have their own way to stand out.
Similar threads
