Red Sox slumping badly. Other than Lester & Bucholz, they don't have much as far as starting pitching goes. :thumb:
I predict that the Jays will have caught up to the Red Sox by June 23rd. Likely sooner.
Let's calculate this. In their last ten games, the "slumplng badly" Red Sox are 7-3. In their last ten games, the "playing very good baseball" Jays are 5-5. Hmmm. 2+2=7, 1+4=12. That makes 23. Add 6, multiply by 4. And you get...June 23. Looks like you nailed it again, Doc.Red Sox slumping badly....
Back in Toronto, the Jays are playing very good baseball these days. They've found their groove, and the hitting is where it should be.
Speaking of John Lackey, his 2.72 ERA, his 1.13 WHIP, his 11 walks and 40 punchados in 39.2 innings, here's what Nick Swisher had to say about last night.Don't count Lackey out yet, Doc! Lol.
Mr. Merlot, neither what I wrote or what rumps wrote is in the crap disturbing category.
What's interesting, Doc, is that the Sox are 1/2 game out despite getting almost nothing from Drew, Middlebrooks, Ellsbury, and Gomes. The offense has been carried by four players.
Red Sox slumping badly.
Back in Toronto, the Jays are playing very good baseball these days. They've found their groove, and the hitting is where it should be.
No one player more affects a team's ability to win than the pitcher.
Speaking of John Lackey, his 2.72 ERA, his 1.13 WHIP, his 11 walks and 40 punchados in 39.2 innings,...Swisher, "one thing he had going for him tonight was location"...Giambi, “his location was on tonight."
Hey Boyz,
Rumps has not made, and definitely not repeated a false accusation over and over for any reason...never mind just to be nasty.
BTW - You're a Mets fan acting like a Yankees fan so you can team up to attack Red Sox fans. I've never seen anyone totally dump his own team in any thread in any sport before and join with arch-rival fans.
Merlot
How 'bout them smokin' hot Jays. At this rate, lessee, they oughta be about 17 games out by October.Jon Morosi said:Jon Morosi @jonmorosi
Blue Jays are 10-11 since the start of May, during which time their AL East deficit went from 8-1/2 games to 9-1/2.
How about this first base umpire?
http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/mlb-b...y-blown-call-leads-phantom-3-6-101820504.html
Three flames in one post and you say you aren't a disturber. .
I've referred to you as a Mets fan in several posts for weeks. You took no offense and made no denial until today.
I'm not originally from Massachusetts, but I don't root for the Rays or Marlins, and I have never switched or betrayed allegiances.
Cheers,
Merlot
I'm not originally from Massachusetts, but I don't root for the Rays or Marlins, and I have never switched or betrayed allegiances.
Cheers,
Merlot
The problem here, other of course than the obviously blown call, is that Wedge argued that the first baseman's foot was off the bag. The umps conferred and disagreed with Wedge. Had he argued that the first baseman wasn't even the one who caught the ball, perhaps the end result would have been different.Umpires are having a bad year this year. He was clearly safe. Ump probably didn't see the first baseman's foot on the bag. Maybe, baseball should give in to complete camera review on disputed calls?
The problem here, other of course than the obviously blown call, is that Wedge argued that the first baseman's foot was off the bag. The umps conferred and disagreed with Wedge. Had he argued that the first baseman wasn't even the one who caught the ball, perhaps the end result would have been different.
Yes, the surging Jays are closing fast. Three weeks ago they were 10.5 back, now they've closed the gap to only 9.5. At this rate, they ought to be in first place by November.Good Old Doc Holliday said:Back in Toronto, the Jays are playing very good baseball these days. They've found their groove, and the hitting is where it should be.
CENTRAL | W | L | PCT | GB | HOME | ROAD | RS | RA | DIFF | STRK | L10 | POFF |
St. Louis | 31 | 16 | .660 | - | 14-8 | 17-8 | 225 | 159 | +66 | Won 3 | 7-3 | 89.6 |
Cincinnati | 31 | 18 | .633 | 1 | 18-6 | 13-12 | 237 | 174 | +63 | Won 5 | 8-2 | 80.5 |
Pittsburgh | 30 | 19 | .612 | 2 | 18-9 | 12-10 | 192 | 167 | +25 | Won 1 | 8-2 | 45.3 |