t76, actually I am a francophone that was educated in the English school system. If I had kids I could send them wherever I wanted to.
When it comes to immigration, Quebec has control and the current level is around 46,000 per year. Most of them are French speaking. And all their children are forced to be educated in French schools. So even if the French birthrate is down, they still are able to have children sent to their school system. The English community does not have this option. As their birthrate declines there is no immigration to help their school system survive.
Look, basically you can't force a culture on people. Immigrants have their own which they bring with them and which they will not give up. Anglophones resent having French forced down their throats but for the most part they deal with it. Then we have Herouxville and now Brownsburg-Chatham who want to pass a law prohibiting any religious clothing in public, including the Jewish tradition of wearing the Yarmulke. How can the majority expect the minorities to want to join them if they are always being attacked for their language, their beliefs and their way of dressing themselves?
Discriminatory laws are useless. All they do is cause people to resent those who pass them. If a culture is destined to survive it will do so on it's own merits. All the laws in the world will not be successful in preserving it.
We can either work together to build a great society or continue to spend years at each others throats in a futile attempt to prove that one culture is better than all the rest. Which is the better idea?
Techman
When it comes to immigration, Quebec has control and the current level is around 46,000 per year. Most of them are French speaking. And all their children are forced to be educated in French schools. So even if the French birthrate is down, they still are able to have children sent to their school system. The English community does not have this option. As their birthrate declines there is no immigration to help their school system survive.
Look, basically you can't force a culture on people. Immigrants have their own which they bring with them and which they will not give up. Anglophones resent having French forced down their throats but for the most part they deal with it. Then we have Herouxville and now Brownsburg-Chatham who want to pass a law prohibiting any religious clothing in public, including the Jewish tradition of wearing the Yarmulke. How can the majority expect the minorities to want to join them if they are always being attacked for their language, their beliefs and their way of dressing themselves?
Discriminatory laws are useless. All they do is cause people to resent those who pass them. If a culture is destined to survive it will do so on it's own merits. All the laws in the world will not be successful in preserving it.
We can either work together to build a great society or continue to spend years at each others throats in a futile attempt to prove that one culture is better than all the rest. Which is the better idea?
Techman