Ask us anything part 3

[Endurance2024]

[Men] Have you seen a lot of erect penis in real life?

Now before you giggle and tell me “you’re so silly Lena”. I’m asking because a lot of you don’t know what a big dick is. I have told a lot of men that theirs was big and they didn’t believe me. I blame porn and the fact that they probably haven’t seen that many penises in real life

I have to agree with you with the porn warping reality. Didn't think mine was big compared with stunt cocks you see in porn. My SO use to tell me I was big but I was sceptical.
Seeing SPs the last couple of years part of my criteria for repeat visits is if she comfortable with my size.
Saw a man's erect penis during my first MFM with one of my SP favs and one of her other trusted clients. That was an interesting 90min.

 

[LC18]

@LC18 i saw you answering how to deal with big engine, but my question is : what is considered big fo you, i know its different for everyone

Hard to tell as I don’t welcome my clients with a measuring tape but whenever it’s big I let my clients know and we adjust. Sometimes men are surprised to be considered big

I like to remind them that I’ve seen a lot more dicks than they have

 

[x5fq]

Hard to tell as I don’t welcome my clients with a measuring tape but whenever it’s big I let my clients know and we adjust. Sometimes men are surprised to be considered big

I like to remind them that I’ve seen a lot more dicks than they have

The "porn is fake" argument is dead. Amateur content killed it. A phone propped on a nightstand, no lighting, no script : that is as real as it gets. And at 4 inches, you are not in the frame

Go look at any dating app where sex is the actual objective: the event photos, the casting posts, the meetup recaps. Not a single small guy. Not one. If you do spot one, he is almost certainly the cuckold of the couple running the event. Cuckolding is a cerebral dynamic, it has nothing to do with size. But you dare to show up and are below the threshold, the role available to you is already written : you watch

And when you say you have seen more dicks than they have : technically true. But that is a selection bias problem. The men who pay for intimacy are not a random sample of the male population. They are disproportionately the ones who could not get there any other way. Your reference pool skews below the actual average by construction. The well endowed men who still see you are there for other reasons : the exhaustion of modern dating, discretion, simplicity. Not because a woman looked at them naked and quietly left the room

The gap between what men believe is normal and what actually gets selected for is real, growing, and impossible to look away from. And behind that gap, there are men who wake up every day carrying something that has no name in polite conversation : the thought that if intimacy is permanently out of reach, so is the point of being here

 

[LC18]

They are disproportionately the ones who could not get there any other way.

False, I have a lot of very attractive clients that could very much just open tinder and fuck the same night

They choose convenience and less drama

 

[LC18]

I would say my experience is relevant because I have seen men from different ages, races, statures etc.

 

[twenty4seven]

The "porn is fake" argument is dead. Amateur content killed it. A phone propped on a nightstand, no lighting, no script : that is as real as it gets. And at 4 inches, you are not in the frame

Go look at any dating app where sex is the actual objective: the event photos, the casting posts, the meetup recaps. Not a single small guy. Not one. If you do spot one, he is almost certainly the cuckold of the couple running the event. Cuckolding is a cerebral dynamic, it has nothing to do with size. But you dare to show up and are below the threshold, the role available to you is already written : you watch

And when you say you have seen more dicks than they have : technically true. But that is a selection bias problem. The men who pay for intimacy are not a random sample of the male population. They are disproportionately the ones who could not get there any other way. Your reference pool skews below the actual average by construction. The well endowed men who still see you are there for other reasons : the exhaustion of modern dating, discretion, simplicity. Not because a woman looked at them naked and quietly left the room

The gap between what men believe is normal and what actually gets selected for is real, growing, and impossible to look away from. And behind that gap, there are men who wake up every day carrying something that has no name in polite conversation : the thought that if intimacy is permanently out of reach, so is the point of being here

There's a lot of dots here you're connecting based on assumptions. Dick size is probably not in the top 10 reasons why men see providers but I'd rely on the experience of women here over a guess.

 

[Giselle Montreal]

The men who pay for intimacy are not a random sample of the male population. They are disproportionately the ones who could not get there any other way. Your reference pool skews below the actual average by construction. The well endowed men who still see you are there for other reasons : the exhaustion of modern dating, discretion, simplicity.

As if women only want to be in relationships with men with big penises. If I can't play with it with ease or if it gives me cold sweat during penetration, I won't be satisfied sexually, and he won't either.

Us only seeing the unlucky, detritus of society couldn't be farther from the truth.

It's how you talk about yourself? Are you that ashamed to pay for intimacy?

 

[LC18]

It's how you talk about yourself? Are you that ashamed to pay for intimacy?

DE LA PROJECTION!!!

Honestly that’s self hate coming from him

 

[Rebaynia]

For SPs do you prefer regulars or is stranger sex a thrill to see who your next regular might be?

I prefer regulars. I find meeting new people unsettling.

 

[x5fq]

@LC18 Tout part de ta propre phrase: "I blame porn." D'accord. Mais le contenu amateur ne corrige pas ce biais, il le confirme. Pas parce qu'un producteur sélectionne, mais parce que les gens (mr et mme tout le monde) se sélectionnent eux-mêmes avant d'appuyer sur record. Deux sources opposées qui pointent dans la même direction, ce n'est plus un biais

Tu dis avoir vu plus de pénis qu'eux. En volume, oui. Mais ton échantillon n'est pas représentatif de la population masculine générale. Les hommes qui paient pour de l'intimité y viennent pour des raisons qui les distinguent déjà de la moyenne, que ce soit par manque d'alternative ou par choix de sortir d'un dating devenu épuisant. Donc quand tu dis à un client qu'il est bien monté, tu le mesures contre ce pool là, pas contre la distribution réelle. Ce n'est pas de l'autorité, c'est un biais de sélection habillé en expérience

Et parler de clients attractifs qui pourraient ouvrir Tinder ce soir ne change rien : l'attractivité et la taille sont deux variables distinctes. Répondre sur l'une pour défendre l'autre, c'est répondre à côté

@Giselle Montreal Ce que les femmes disent vouloir et ce que les hommes obtiennent réellement ne sont pas la même chose. Le mot "relationships" vient de toi, pas de moi. La honte et la peur ne sont pas synonymes non plus. Cette peur est calibrée sur ce que toutes les références disponibles documentent dans le même sens. C'est ça le sujet depuis le début

 

[LC18]

Even amateur porn often features bigger cocks because while it’s amateur, it’s inspired from professional porn

I don’t know who you think is booking me but I’m telling you they’re regular people. Married people, single people, in open relationship people, sex addicted, virgins. If that’s not a varied representation of the population I don’t know what it is

 

[Giselle Montreal]

Mais ton échantillon n'est pas représentatif de la population masculine générale.

C’est exactement la population masculine générale qui nous voit.

Tu n’as clairement aucune idée qui est notre clientèle, tes arguments ne font aucun sens. Je n’ai rien à ajouter à tout ceci.

 

[x5fq]

Even amateur porn often features bigger cocks because while it’s amateur, it’s inspired from professional porn

I don’t know who you think is booking me but I’m telling you they’re regular people. Married people, single people, in open relationship people, sex addicted, virgins. If that’s not a varied representation of the population I don’t know what it is

Tu fais la confusion entre deux types de contenu amateur. Le contenu inspiré du porno professionnel, avec un objectif pécunier et une esthétique travaillée : ce n'est pas ce dont il était question. Ce dont il était question c'est un couple qui se filme avec un téléphone posé sur une table de nuit, sans objectif de diffusion. Et même là, même dans ce contenu là, 4 inches n'est pas dans le cadre

Sur la clientèlen : marié, célibataire, vierge, en relation ouverte. Ce sont des statuts relationnels, pas des mesures de taille. La diversité sur une variable ne prouve rien sur une autre. Ce sont deux choses qui ne se parlent pas.

 

[twenty4seven]

Tu fais la confusion entre deux types de contenu amateur. Le contenu inspiré du porno professionnel, avec un objectif pécunier et une esthétique travaillée : ce n'est pas ce dont il était question. Ce dont il était question c'est un couple qui se filme avec un téléphone posé sur une table de nuit, sans objectif de diffusion. Et même là, même dans ce contenu là, 4 inches n'est pas dans le cadre

Sur la clientèlen : marié, célibataire, vierge, en relation ouverte. Ce sont des statuts relationnels, pas des mesures de taille. La diversité sur une variable ne prouve rien sur une autre. Ce sont deux choses qui ne se parlent pas.

Keep going, you've almost got them convinced...

 

[LeDodo]

For those average or below average guys like me reading discussions about big dicks can come give me a high five

 

[LC18]

Ce sont des statuts relationnels, pas des mesures de taille. La diversité sur une variable ne prouve rien sur une autre. Ce sont deux choses qui ne se parlent pas.

Bravo, tu viens de réaliser que tu n’avais pas rapport depuis le début. Happy for you!

What does seeing escorts have to do with your size, anyone can see escorts but somehow you seem to want to put those people in a separate class and think they’re not a good sample.

In your little dick survey, you’d be waiting for men in a bar washroom and ask them if they’ve ever hired an escort, if they say yes you’d exclude them? On what grounds lmao. Seeing an escort or not had no influence on your dick size

 

[Julia Sky]

The self-hate and projection is too real, lol