Best recruiting agency?With best talents?

[cobra1]

the poll question is really in 2 parts
best recruiter and servicer.
from about 6-7 months with new guy
mojo in the game(site-video-pics) sort of
pushed others to step up their game more then usual.
exxtase,goodgirls,nadya have 7 or more new girls just in the last 6-7 months so all equal with my vote here

but exxtase pulls ahead for me for servicing with their new
recruits. the passion the ymmv and openess were awesome

ps. of course this objective. because wasn't able to try all of their new girls for various reasons

 

[Sol Tee Nutz]

So Nadya still has the lead for all non GT agencies and for exclusive incall agency

It would have been much easier on you if the poll had only Nadya to chose from then you would have gotten the result you were looking for.


Enjoy.

 

[Sol Tee Nutz]

Has for your vote STN you many times over the course of last year prided yourself of a situation @ Nadya.
In this business you must be able to respect others even when they have contrary opinion to ours.

Hope you are not suggesting that my vote is biased because Nadya gave me a lifetime ban from her agency. Since Leah left there is no one there that I want to see.
For the second part, burk. It has nothing to do with her opinion.

 

[BookerL]

It would have been much easier on you if the poll had only Nadya to chose from then you would have gotten the result you were looking for.


Enjoy.

Hello STN

If it would be my opinion that wanted I would do so in the context of a review where only my opinion counts for my personal encounter

If it's done through a poll it is obvious that what you want to have is opinons of others even when you know that opinion varies .
What I mostly astonished about is this poll is heading for then 3,000 views
Which for a no non sense poll is definitely attracting lots of attention .
Having different groups voting creates a more credible and interesting poll
As for your situation STN ,I am not suggesting anything
We have met and when we did you where a total gentleman,
You are of legal age and you can vote for whomever you please
for whatever reason you please and even without one if you please.

Happy hobbying to all

Cheers

Booker

 

[The Bear]

i must say, this thread has made for some interesting reading. Many of the posts are thoughful and interesting, and I have learnt a thing or two about the subject. However, it is also interesting from a sociological viewpoint, in terms of some of the reactions it has provoked among some people who seem to take rather too seriously, in my view, the numerical results of what is essentially an unscientific poll (which is not to say it is a "bad" poll; presumably it was intended for people to have fun with, and to provoke some interesting conversation, and it has certainly succeeded in that!)

 

[BookerL]

i must say, this thread has made for some interesting reading

.Indeed Bear

Many of the posts are thoughful and interesting, and I have learnt a thing or two about the subject. However, it is also interesting from a sociological viewpoint, in terms of some of the reactions it has provoked among some people who seem to take rather too seriously, in my view,

Seriously might be a little soft in this context

the numerical results of what is essentially an unscientific poll (which is not to say it is a "bad" poll; presumably it was intended for people to have fun with, and to provoke some interesting conversation, and it has certainly succeeded in that!)

Well I would agree to the term ''Bad'' and also very unscientific but like any other Polls conducted here for fun .
This poll will exceed by far 3,000 views which on itself is very amazing ,it has at the moment exceeded best rookie in numbers of views .



Cheers



Booker

 

[rumpleforeskiin]

We all know that the voters are GG admirers, Nadya's Admirers etc...

Pretty much nailed it. Had the question been, "Which agency is most likely to broker a peace agreement between Israel and Iran," the results would be pretty much the same.

 

[BookerL]

, "Which agency is most likely to broker a peace agreement between Israel and Iran," the results would be pretty much the same.

Hummmmm? Are you specialist of peace in the Middle East ?



Cheers




Booker

 

[BookerL]

Les couteaux vole bas

Quel drôle de situation unique pour un poll sympathique a la base !


Bonne chance a tous



salutation



Booker

 

[BookerL]

Definitely had interesting ideas in this thread some less


Happy hobbying to all


Cheers

Booker

 

[smuler]

Good Girls

No doubt

Best Regards

Smuler

 

[BookerL]

Strange sometimes how things might go !
MCS ,MTLGFE,MOJO

Many times 10 girls on roster on a day and not many votes ?



Cheers



Booker

 

[BookerL]

Hello all


Over 4,000 views already ,certainly has a bit of interest from some members ?




Cheers




Booker

 

[hungry101]

I think that the best recruiters should be the agency that has the highest number of debutantes working. It used to be John at Eleganza. I can remember saying this to Jazz. She said "what recruiting? I answered an add in the paper." So that is all it takes I guess. At least John put adds in the paper?

Mike and James seem to do a good job of pulling in the debutantes. I am not sure what is going on with teaming up with the established indies but I also like this too. In my experience Indies are only 50/50 and some require a secretary to improve reliability. If teaming up with an agency does this than I am all for it. I will say that Maria Starr already had a secretary and is very reliable and professional. But there are some of the others that may benefit from teaming up with an agency.

Does anyone have a handle on the agencies and which girls working are debutantes recruited in the past year? It seem to me that G4U does a pretty good job.

I just read Nadya's post. She makes a good point. And if she can refine them get the newbies to dress the part like Wolfie suggests than this is important.

I do like the fact that girls are free to change agencies or go indy. This is proof to the do-gooders out there that there are few controlling pimps that try to own them in the MERB scene.

 

[wolfie7]

Interesting thread indeed. I haven't been following real-time, having stopped on page 3. But, it looks like GG is solidly ahead now, after a slow start. As it should be.

In my opinion, and mine only, the results look about right, as of today, for me. I would probably flip MSC for xxxtase, but that might be because I'm not local, and I will always have a soft spot for one of the original 3. Heh, if you were to use a "family tree" or "association tree", it's fitting my Top 3 agencies today are GG, Nadya's and xxxtase. And many moons ago, it was Eleganza, xxxtase and Devilish...

Some reactions to earlier posts that I wanted to comment on:

Since G4U has a group of 16 dedicated admirers it was a forgone conclusion to the ending that they would take the lead if they wanted too
...

I am all for solidarity in friendship.
...

And congrats the unity of G4U group of 16

Booker, you make it sound like we're a voting block, or some kind of Machiavellian cabal, that mindlessly vote for GG, regardless of circumstance. This whole 'solidarity' and 'unity' bit. That's frankly a little insulting... As you can see from the results, since that comment, GG has racked up quite the lead. It is merit-based. Clearly, I'm not the only one who has had a great track record with GG, and reward them with this merit-based recognition. Nadya's is a well-deserved #2 in my book, and rapidly climbing, based on recent experiences. If and when Nadya's merits the top spot, I would happily vote for them. And, just because I didn't vote for Nadya's as top, doesn't mean I'm not an admirer of Nadya and Carroll.

...
But the first agency I went too when I registered to Merb wasn't
Nadya's and that agency lost the opportunity to gain a long time respectfulrespectful client of multi hours and multi girls
This conversation wouldn't even be happening if it would not have a disaster.

I am always positive but sadly nothing positive came out of my encounter other then I would not go back .

And speaking of solidarity, unity and not taking the blinders off... Booker, pls don't take this the wrong way, I think your posts are highly amusing and thoughtful, and I like you, dude. But, you are as guilty as anyone of propping up one agency against another. And why? Seriously, talk about classic "cutting off the nose to spite the face"...

Why not make up with GG, rather than all this posturing? You're missing out on some great fun, my friend. I'm being a little hypocritical... as I too have an agency on my shitlist this year, but I'm not public about it, and, more importantly, I'm not missing out on any great fun IMO. You are though, with your boycott.

We all have bad days. And as a former booker, can you really blame fellow bookers for occasionally having bad days, too? Especially if they're constantly mad busy? I've had misunderstandings with almost all of my bookers in the past, here and elsewhere - they respond slowly, they cancel last minute, they snap at me. We get over it, as long as both sides cool their heels and get back to being reasonable. And when an agency is as good as GG... well... sometimes you try a little harder to get over it!

Maybe the relationship is beyond repair. If so, that's too bad. If reconciliation is possible, why not? Bigger picture, we're all here to have fun, on one side, and make money, on the other. Let cooler heads prevail, and let this merry mission be on its way. There's room enough for Nadya's and GG, and more!

Wolfie

 

[wolfie7]

Oh, and one more comment on a previous post.

We all know that the voters are GG admirers, Nadya's Admirers etc...
They dont vote for the best recuiters but for their prefered agency. no matter the topic of the poll.
Only you voted for the best recuiter lol. We can see in all your post in this thread that you are not a Nadyas agency admirer.

Isn't "best" and "preferred" and "most popular" all synonymous? Quality begets quantity, and isn't this hobby the ultimate reflection of best = most popular??? We vote with our visits and dollars, no? I would assume we are all rational and would utilize what we think is best, no?? Why would anyone prefer not-best?

 

[BookerL]

Oh, and one more comment on a previous post.



Isn't "best" and "preferred" and "most popular" all synonymous?

Hello wolfie

Definitely not!
A example of this Rolex is a" best" then "timex" but guess what "timex" is way more popular !

We vote with our visits and dollars, no? I would assume we are all rational and would utilize what we think is best, no?? Why would anyone prefer not-best?

That is also a easy answer ,but find it by yourself no offense intended.It will be more rewarding
You are a cool "Dude" too Wolfie


Cheers


Booker

 

[wolfie7]

Hello wolfie

Definitely not!
A example of this Rolex is a" best" then "timex" but guess what "timex" is way more popular !

Booker

LOL. :lol: Funny... A Rolex and Timex are at very different price points, hence it's not a fair apples-to-apples comparison. When comparing these agencies, price points are more or less the same. You provide a bad example with the time pieces.

Speaking of which... that reminds me of another one of your posts I should comment on!

 

[wolfie7]

This one!

Helle Wolfie

...

I check regularly the roster of many and the reviews ,
I have to appreciate the top quality servicing provided by Nadya's girls
After all I am looking for a Booker service Carroll and Nadya have analyzed my needs and then only recommand to me those who will .
By doing so they show dedication in the art of vip servicing

I for one much prefer quality to quatity ,but then I have to admit I have never eaten in Poutine in my life and I ware exclusiF high end watches

They are choices for all

Happy hobbying to all

Cheers

Booker

So the poutine inclusion caught my eye. So, I also wear and collect 'exclusif' nice time pieces - Vacheron's, Jaeger's, Patek Philippe's, Piaget's and lessers. I also eat poutine. Love the stuff whenever I'm in Montreal! So, what's that make me?

Should that somehow reflect on my taste in women and agencies? I see no association. I guess I have diversity in taste. :lol:

 

[BookerL]

Interesting thread indeed.

Thanks for the positive comment Wolfie

Booker, you make it sound like we're a voting block, or some kind of Machiavellian cabal, that mindlessly vote for GG, regardless of circumstance. This whole 'solidarity' and 'unity' bit. .

That's frankly a little insulting... .

Wow a positive compliment on my appreciation of unity between friends or group insulting?
How can you pay a tribute to someone when positive intents en wording suddenly becomes insulting ?

As you can see from the results, since that comment, GG has racked up quite the lead. It is merit-based. Clearly, I'm not the only one who has had a great track record with GG, and reward them with this merit-based recognition. Nadya's is a well-deserved #2 in my book, and rapidly climbing, based on recent experiences. If and when Nadya's merits the top spot, I would happily vote for them. And, just because I didn't vote for Nadya's as top, doesn't mean I'm not an admirer of Nadya and Carroll.

I have no agency on my" shit "list my qualified votes in order in the "Best " agency of the year 2014 Nadya ,MTLGFE and yes you will have guessed it G4U. And even compliments for all the extras they are achieving with astute marketing .
What is sad is when you come to a point where true compliments are interpreted as attacks ,really sad?

And speaking of solidarity, unity and not taking the blinders off... Booker, pls don't take this the wrong way, I think your posts are highly amusing and thoughtful, and I like you, dude. But, you are as guilty as anyone of propping up one agency against another. And why? Seriously, talk about classic "cutting off the nose to spite the face"...

Why not make up with GG, rather than all this posturing? You're missing out on some great fun, my friend. I'm being a little hypocritical... as I too have an agency on my shitlist this year, but I'm not public about it, and, more importantly, I'm not missing out on any great fun IMO. You are though, with your boycott.

I am having fun in this hobby with or without G4U .I have never said anything negative about there GT's but complimented its success .I have even posted the second comment on there last party thread and it was a positive one .
I always lift my hat for great accomplishment,but a review board is also there for misfire?

We all have bad days. And as a former booker, can you really blame fellow bookers for occasionally having bad days, too? Especially if they're constantly mad busy?

I am not blaming a specific booker for a bad day .
But when it becomes a series of event that will exceed a bad day .

I've had misunderstandings with almost all of my bookers in the past, here and elsewhere - they respond slowly, they cancel last minute, they snap at me. We get over it, as long as both sides cool their heels and get back to being reasonable. And when an agency is as good as GG... well... sometimes you try a little harder to get over it!

Maybe the relationship is beyond repair. If so, that's too bad. If reconciliation is possible, why not? Bigger picture, we're all here to have fun, on one side, and make money, on the other. Let cooler heads prevail, and let this merry mission be on its way. There's room enough for Nadya's and GG, and more!

Wolfie

Obviously there;s room for many agencies in Montreal whatever the names maybe ,all agencies that makes a good move will aways receive praised from me ,further more I have never negatively reviewed a SP ,but when you go in a incall whatever agency it might ,the place should be kept clean with ample towels and soap ,if its a mist the booker should the courtesy to explore ways with the patron to make it right ?
Isn't that reasonable?
Or simply to much to handle ?



Cheers




Booker