Montreal Escorts

Buying investment properties ?Or stock Market?

jalimon

I am addicted member
Dec 28, 2015
6,268
162
63
Hello jalimon


A few questions?
Would that be a million in assets ?
A million in equity ?
Or the Capital gain you have made in previous ventures ?
Or others ?
At the end ,its not the same amount




Cheers



Booker

I could have put more detail indeed. What I am trying to say is that if you are willing to use a financial broker to manages your investment, better to have a million to invest. I have exagerated the amout a little as I recently met with a high profile broker, I liked the guy and his strategy, but he demanded half a million to start off, which was still to much for me. If like me you are not in that league, I personnaly think you are better off by yourself simply taking REER, CELI, safe long term stock as iShare or banking. If if do not have a property, I would say then first move is to buy one (and remember to buy a good location!).

Regular bank or other financial institution broker will sell you what their management tells them to sell you to make more profit for the house. I went that way a long time and since I took over everything I am doing much much better.

Of course, this is just my opinion as many many factors needs to be taken into consideration according to everyone's scenario. To answer the question of the initial thread, I do not think one form of investment is better then the other one, you need balance, you need both ;)

Cheers,
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Vancouver housing sales hit record highs during real estate boom

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/real...ighs-during-real-estate-boom/article29842167/



Housing prices in Vancouver’s suburbs are soaring as sales volume hits record highs during the real estate boom.

The benchmark price for single-family detached houses sold last month in Tsawwassen, B.C., reached a record $1.17-million, up 41 per cent since April, 2015. Other suburbs that saw prices leap to new highs in the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver’s territory include Richmond, Ladner, Port Coquitlam, Coquitlam, New Westminster, Port Moody and Burnaby.

Those suburbs enjoyed percentage gains in prices that were higher than on Vancouver’s west side and east side, which have traditionally led the housing rally.


In Greater Vancouver as a whole, the benchmark price for detached houses surpassed $1.4-million last month to set a record, up 30.1 per cent from a year earlier. The benchmark price is a representation of the typical house in an area, providing a better barometer of real estate trends than average resale prices, according to the board.

The benchmark price for detached properties sold last month was $3.2-million on Vancouver’s west side and $1.35-million on the east side, both up more than 28 per cent.

Sales volume set a record for the third consecutive month in Greater Vancouver. There were 4,781 transactions last month, up 14.4 per cent from April, 2015, and 41.7 per cent higher than the sales average for that month.

In the Fraser Valley Real Estate Board’s territory, east of Vancouver, the benchmark price for detached houses was $776,500 last month, up 30.4 per cent from a year earlier. The number of transactions set a record for the fourth consecutive month in the Fraser Valley.

In both Greater Vancouver and the Fraser Valley, March sales set all-time records for any month of the year. April tends to be slower than March for attracting buyers.

Fraser Valley board president Charles Wiebe said the robust B.C. economy, low interest rates, strong demand and limited housing supply are contributing to the region’s housing boom.

But Josh Gordon, an assistant professor at Simon Fraser University’s School of Public Policy, argues that foreign demand is the main driver of the residential housing bonanza, especially an influx of buyers from China.

While the Vancouver region is bounded by the ocean, mountains and the Canada-U.S. border, Prof. Gordon estimates that geographic constraints account for less than 30 per cent of the price surge in recent years. And he said the economy and low mortgage rates have little to do with the frenzy of real estate activity.

“This continuous flow of money from abroad, combined with inaction and disinterest on the part of Canadian governments, has created expectations of continuously rising prices,” he wrote in a new study, warning about a housing affordability crisis.

“The provincial government in particular has become hooked on the tax revenues and short-term economic growth that the housing bubble has generated.”

The seller’s market includes condos, which have jumped 20.6 per cent over the past year to $475,000 for the benchmark price in Greater Vancouver – relatively affordable for the region.

“But beware: Most of these condos will not be family friendly, so they only offer a short-term option for many,” Prof. Gordon said.



Cheers




Booker
 

Pvt. Papineau

New Member
Sep 20, 2010
32
0
0
There is a bubble in Vancouver and Toronto, when that bubble burst it will have an effect all over the country. Montreal will feel the hit. My prediction is a 25-30% correction. It will take years to recover.
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
There is a bubble in Vancouver and Toronto, when that bubble burst it will have an effect all over the country. Montreal will feel the hit. My prediction is a 25-30% correction. It will take years to recover.

Are implying that there is a nationwide real estate bubble ?
If there is a 60% increase over the course of 3 years and theres a correction of -25 % in the fourth year ,how will it affect the owner which is in is 5th or more years ?




Cheers




Booker
 

Doggyluver

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2004
2,246
259
83
Anywhere and everywhere
Visit site
I work in the investment industry and my best advice, whether the investments are in the stock market or real estate is to be sure to diversify. When I construct a portfolio I am using no more than 4.5% in each stock with a healthy 10-15% in cash ( for opportunities) and my clients know that we are in for an investment cycle (10 years) this is not to say that changes will not be made under normal circumstances, good or bad news. When I see an unusual increase in an investment , at some point I recommend that we take some of the profits off the table. If the same principals are applied to investments in the real estate market and multiple properties are purchased in multiple locations with a view to holding the properties for a long term, money WILL be made. Again, in the case of an exponential increase or drop in market prices, the investments need to be re-evaluated and decisions made as to whether or not to divest yourself of these investments.
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Hello all



I remember when I was a young boy my parents where buying properties in Ottawa .In 1963 they purchased a High-end property that was in Alta-vista area ,from a home that was in the Sandy Hill area .
The one in Alta-Vista was paid $19,900, in 1963 it was brand new at the time
Then was sold $38,000 in 1971
To purchase a Huge 60' frontage property at $44,500 in the Gloucester area
My parents where always proud of there deals at that time I did not understand why .
In 1984 that property was sold for close of $200,000,

The point I want to make each property made a very interesting capital over a span of 8 to 13 years .

When I became of age and had the cash down ,for real estate investment was a no "brainner ".

I realize that some might be more comfortable with other types of investment but for me ,it is the best
because of the knowledge and experience acquired over the years .

I agree with Doggyluver diversity and long term and also re-evaluation,they are excellent advice from is part ,


To hit multi-areas in real estate is excellent because not all areas have same level in increase in the same Province or city or area of the city or even street .



Good Luck





Cheers










Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Hello all



Soaring Prices

http://www.theprovince.com/business...ales+soar+metro+vancouver/11960985/story.html


The suburbs are hot.

New sales figures show the heat of the housing market isn’t confined within Vancouver’s city limits, with suburban areas showing the largest increases in average home prices over the last year, and some regions soaring by more than 45 per cent.

All 20 regions tracked by the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver (REBGV) have seen significant price increases over the last year, according to data released Thursday, but nowhere has the surge been as sharp as in Tsawwassen. The benchmark price of a detached home in Tsawwassen is $1,257,100, REBGV reported, an increase of 48.2 per cent over the last year.

Tsawwassen is “absolutely smoking,” said Mark Wiens, a realtor with Sutton Group West Coast. “Values are skyrocketing now, activity is skyrocketing now.”

A few years ago, Wiens wouldn’t have thought of Tsawwassen, a community of about 21,000 in the southwestern corner of Delta, as a place for multimillion-dollar condos. But last month, Wiens listed a condo overlooking Tsawwassen Springs Golf Course for $3,968,000, which he expects to sell soon. The penthouse unit, described by Wiens as “the highest end of the highest end,” includes 2,757 square feet of patio space with a private putting green.

Wiens, who has listings around the Lower Mainland, said he’s seen a surge in buyer interest in Tsawwassen, especially in the last six months.

“As we start seeing some of the real estate markets slow down a little bit, in Tsawwassen there’s no sign of any slow down at all,” Wiens said. “A lot of it is from people who are so-called ‘cashing out’ in Vancouver. People are saying, ‘Hey look, I just sold my place in Vancouver and I have two months to buy a place. I’ve made this windfall, and therefore if I have to pay a little bit extra — which for someone in Tsawwassen who’s selling, it’s a large amount — it doesn’t really matter.’ “

Farther east, Fraser Valley municipalities have been hot over the last year, with average house prices climbing faster than Vancouver or the North Shore.

The Fraser Valley Real Estate Board reported Thursday that the benchmark price of a Fraser Valley single-family detached home in May was $834,200, an increase of 38.3 per cent compared with May 2015 when it was $603,100. Sales volume increased 47.8 per cent over the same time.

Another report released Thursday from the B.C. Real Estate Association notes: “Current sales activity is at a record level, with the Fraser Valley and Chilliwack mirroring Vancouver’s breakneck pace of transactions.”

Gary Morris, managing broker with Homelife Benchmark Realty, said “it’s been an incredible year” for his South Surrey office.

“It’s a rippling effect, it starts in Vancouver and it gradually moves out. What we’re finding now is people are even being priced out of South Surrey, so anybody looking for a single-family house in South Surrey, they have to pretty much start at a million dollars. So they move to Langley now. And now Langley is getting almost priced-out,” Morris said. “That’s what we’re finding now: people are waiting in lineups to buy condominiums in Langley — I mean, who ever heard of that?”

But the record-setting pace of property sales and price increases in Metro Vancouver could slow by next year, according to the BCREA forecast. The BCREA report predicts the average price of a detached home in Greater Vancouver will soar 30 per cent over the 2016 calendar year, but forecasts a hike of just 4.8 per cent in 2017. Similarly, the BCREA predicts the average price of detached homes in the Fraser Valley will surge 22.9 per cent in 2016, slowing to a 5.2-per-cent increase for 2017.

BCREA chief economist Cameron Muir said B.C.’s strong economic fundamentals will continue to underpin the housing market, but added: “it’s just that the record levels we’re seeing right now and the frenetic activity of homebuying is likely to wane in the coming quarters. Housing markets do ebb and flow, and my anticipation is that next year, we’re likely to see slower home-sales activity than this year, but still well above long-term averages.”

The relaxing demand expected is partly due, Muir said, to the record number of homes under construction now in Metro.

“We’re going to some edging down on the demand side, and an increase on the supply side, which should help keep prices from climbing at the kinds of rates we see today,” he said.





Cheers





Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Old article

Canadian housing market hits $508,097 average price in April as sales rise to record
Average Canadian house price up 13% in April, but wide regional variances remain

Vancouver 21% vs Montreal 1% LOL

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/crea-housing-april-1.3583942

'It's a rippling effect': Home prices and sales soar in Metro Vancouver's suburbs


BY DAN FUMANO JUNE 2, 2016

Hello Tonyw and all

Canadian housing market hits $508,097 average price in April as sales rise to record
Average Canadian house price up 13% in April, but wide regional variances remain
By Pete Evans, CBC News Posted: May 16, 2016 9:14 AM ET Last Updated: May 16, 2016 6:02 PM ET

Really old ,your article is May 16 2016




Cheers




Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Greetings


http://www.theglobeandmail.com/real...ming-to-real-estate-industry/article30681945/

B.C. puts end to real estate self-regulation


B.C. Premier Christy Clark has put the province’s real-estate industry under government oversight, declaring the industry’s self-regulating body has failed to protect the public from cut-throat and illegal practices and has lost the public’s confidence in its ability to police itself.

The announcement comes a day after an independent advisory panel issued a report that included 28 recommendations for how the Real Estate Council of British Columbia should beef up its oversight ability to adjust to a market fuelled by speculation.

B.C. real estate reform: What you need to know

“The point of regulation is to protect people, it is to protect consumers,” Ms. Clark said. “The real-estate sector has had 10 years to get it right on self-regulation, and they haven’t.”


The panel was formed after a Globe and Mail investigation revealed that some realtors in Vancouver’s booming market put their financial interests above those of their clients, and the B.C. Real Estate Council did nothing to stop them.

But Ms. Clark’s government, which faces an election next year, concluded the improvements recommended by the panel would not be enough. The decision to bring realtors under government oversight makes B.C. an outlier: The real-estate industries in most other provinces, including Ontario, Quebec and Alberta, regulate themselves.

The Canadian Real Estate Association said it is reviewing the report. In Ontario, where Toronto’s housing market is also raising concerns about speculation and soaring prices, a senior government official said the province is “looking at many aspects of the real estate sector especially when it comes to the importance of affordability of home ownership,” but would not commit to any moves toward self-regulation.

Ms. Clark’s decision came as a surprise to the B.C. industry, but the outgoing superintendent of real estate, who chaired the advisory panel, said it should not have.

“It usually takes industry a long time to get self-regulation, so they are not going to be happy with it being taken away – but it wasn’t working,” Carolyn Rogers, who is leaving for a new job in Ottawa regulating the banking sector, told The Globe.

“It’s a cautionary tale – because there are other industries out there that self-regulate. It is a privilege, not a right.”

The Premier said her government would adopt all 28 recommendations the advisory group made to improve consumer protection. Those include more educational requirements and screening for aspiring realtors, hefty fines for wrongdoing – a maximum of $250,000 for agents and $500,000 for brokerages – improved consumer education, and more transparency and accountability.

Ms. Clark said the province will appoint a new, dedicated superintendent of real estate who will have authority over the council’s regulations and to implement the report’s recommendations. Currently, the superintendent’s job is part of the duties of the head of Financial Institutions Commission (FICOM). Those duties also include oversight of the pension and financial services sector.

Specifically, Ms. Clark confirmed the province will put an end to “dual agency” – where one realtor represents both buyer and seller – because of the inherent conflict of interest.

The panel’s report, and the Premier’s announcement, followed stories in The Globe that some realtors and brokerage firms were profiting from shadow flipping and other questionable practices. The panel’s report on Tuesday found the Real Estate Council is dominated by industry members who took disciplinary action reluctantly and tentatively.

B.C. real-estate agents have been self-regulated since 2005. The impact of skyrocketing prices and speculation in the housing market are expected to be huge issues in the election campaign. While realtors earn increasingly fat commissions in the Vancouver market, the government is under great pressure to curb any activity that makes buying or selling a home more perilous.

The Liberals have sparred with the City of Vancouver over ways to make housing more affordable, with the province reluctant to intervene in a way that could make things more affordable for buyers, but also cost homeowners some of the equity in their properties.

The BC NDP noted that ending self-regulation will do nothing to make housing in the province more affordable. The Opposition called on the province to create a task force of police, Crown prosecutors and auditors to investigate and prosecute fraud and money laundering.

The Real Estate Council of B.C. posted a brief statement after the Premier’s announcement: “The Council is ready, willing, and able to work with Government to implement the steps announced today,” it said.

Dan Morrison, president of the Real Estate Board of Greater Vancouver told The Globe he expects that most realtors will understand the government’s decision.

“I was a bit surprised – but we will deal with it and move on,” he said. “In hindsight, we all probably should have made more noise to improve our industry faster, and it didn’t happen. But we will just keep working to make it better.”

Don MacKay, a managing broker in Vancouver with 36 years of experience, said his industry got what it deserved.

“We couldn’t handle self-regulation. We should be able to self-regulate, but we couldn’t. I think we were not willing to have more people involved in our business,” Mr. MacKay said.

“Weeding out the bad apples should be pretty easy. All they have to say is, ‘I am sorry, we don’t want you in the business,’ but the council always seemed so reluctant to do that.”

With reports from Wendy Stueck, Karen K. Ho and The Canadian Press


Cheers




Booker
 

Aellyn Rose

New Member
Apr 24, 2016
35
0
0
Personally I'm waiting for China to pull the trigger along with the BRICS countries on their system of international payments - competing directly with SWIFT which is currently our only option. Nobody's talking about it but they should be ready in September - with a huge impact on stocks and real estate.

Hello all


Any revenue property investors on this board ?
Return ratio at purchase ,what is your aim ?
Delay required to improve your revenue ?
At the moment do prefer shorter terms of 2 or 3 years or longer 5 years fixed ?

etc........



Cheers



Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Greetings all


Interesting rental strategies are possible in B.C. ,to increase ROI.:thumb:

As renters compete for sparse and expensive housing, landlords are increasingly using a type of tenancy agreement that allows them to circumvent British Columbia’s 2.9% annual rental increase limit.


Under a fixed-term rental agreement, the renter and the landlord sign a clause agreeing that the rental term will be for a certain time period, usually one year. At the end of the period, the renter agrees to vacate the unit. If the renter wants to stay, he or she must negotiate a whole new lease – which can include a big spike in rent.

“Landlords can get around the cap by getting new tenants in and raising rent,” said Andrew Sakamoto, executive director of the Tenants Resource Advisory Centre (TRAC). “That’s why rent has escalated so much in recent years.”

The City of Vancouver has been offering incentives to developers to build new rental, but does not prohibit fixed-term tenancies in those buildings: city staff said that would require action from the provincial Residential Tenancy Branch.


Spencer Chandra Herbert, NDP MLA for Vancouver-West End, said complaints to his office have picked up over the past two years; the rent increases being asked for range from 10% to 30%.

That’s far above the 2%-plus-inflation annual increase allowed by provincial legislation for renters who are on month-to-month agreements.

Business in Vancouver corresponded with several tenants facing big increases who were reluctant to speak about the issue publicly because they still occupy their unit or are in the process of moving out. In one case, a tenant’s rent for a two-bedroom apartment went up by $350 a month.

While renters must initial a clearly worded statement saying they will vacate the unit at the end of the term, intense competition for scarce apartments means that many are signing with the hope that the landlord will act in good faith. Others don’t understand what they have signed until they get a letter from their landlord stating a significant increase, said Herbert and Sakamoto. But there is little recourse for renters after they have signed the agreement.


An example of a fixed term tenancy form; tenants who agree to accept clause D are left with little recourse to challenge rent increases at the end of the term

A group representing B.C. landlords said fixed term agreements are not “broadly used” by owners of residential rental properties.

“Both parties know the contract ends at a fixed date and the tenant ends their tenancy,” David Hutniak, CEO of Landlords BC, wrote in an email. “The new contract will typically be at market [rent], which is understandable. The 2% plus CPI restriction does not apply in this scenario.”

TRAC has been following the issue for several years and has discussed the problems caused by fixed-term leases with the province’s Residential Tenancy Branch; the group would like to challenge the rules in court, arguing that a tenancy does not actually end if a tenant continues to live in the same place. Herbert has asked Rich Coleman, B.C.’s minister responsible for housing, to change the legislation. And a task force on affordable housing struck by the City of Vancouver has recommended that the province take steps to make sure fixed-term tenancies are not being used to get around the rent-increase cap.

The Residential Tenancy Branch is “working with stakeholders” on the issue of back-to-back fixed-term leases, communications staff at Coleman’s ministry wrote in an email. That work has just started and will take some time.

Fixed-term contracts are one factor that could be driving the sharp rise of rents in Vancouver. Tom Davidoff, an economics professor at the University of British Columbia, was surprised to discover an abnormally high increase in rental rates when he collected Vancouver rental listings information from Craigslist throughout April and May.

“A glance at rents suggest they’re rising quite quickly, and that’s consistent with what I hear from industry people,” Davidoff said.

The results are only a snapshot from one rental listings source, Davidoff cautioned, and more data would need to be collected over a longer period of time to verify the trend.

Between 2015 and 2016, rents in Vancouver’s downtown and West End rose 7.1%, according to Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s fall 2016 survey, while Vancouver’s vacancy rate fell to 0.6%.

As it has in many large Canadian cities, Vancouver’s supply of purpose-built rental buildings has been stagnant for several decades. This year’s sharp increase in property assessments, a result of the steep lift in residential real estate values over the course of 2015, has resulted in much bigger property tax bills for some rental-building owners.

Given the pressures being placed on rental supply in Vancouver, the sharp increase in rates doesn’t surprise Andy Yan, an urban planner and acting director of the city program at Simon Fraser University.

Airbnb and other short-term rental sites are another important factor, Yan said. On June 7, the site InsideAirbnb.com showed 3,179 listings for entire houses or apartments and 1,399 private rooms.

“You’ve got rents going up because supply went down: when supply got cut by Airbnb, by units not being built, and the units that were built were very high-end,” Yan said.

The City of Vancouver is currently studying how to address Airbnb and other short term rental sites.

- With files from Frank O’Brien

Have you had an experience with fixed term tenancy? If you'd like to share your story, please contact Jen St. Denis at [email protected]
https://www.biv.com/article/2016/6/tight-rental-market-bc-landlords-dodge-rent-laws-f/




Cheers





Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
http://www.comoxvalleyrecord.com/news/387849132.html


Real estate tax windfall continues for B.C.



posted Jul 21, 2016 at 1:00 PM— updated Jul 21, 2016 at 2:28 PM
The B.C. government took in more income tax, sales tax and property transfer tax than it budgeted last year, leading to an operating surplus of $730 million for the fiscal year ended March 31.

The focus is on the government's windfall from a hot real estate market, with property transfer tax revenue up $468 million over the previous year, according to audited year-end figures released by Finance Minister Mike de Jong Thursday.

The current B.C. budget had forecast a decline in property transfer tax revenue this year, but de Jong said those revenues are running significantly ahead of what was expected in February. When the B.C. legislature convenes for a rare summer sitting next week, de Jong said there will be further indications of how the government will use its extra revenues to deal with a housing market that has become unaffordable for many people in urban areas.

The government has committed to allow Vancouver to impose a new property tax on vacant homes, in an effort to make absentee owners sell them or offer them for rent. Victoria has indicated an interest in similar taxation power, but de Jong said changes to the Community Charter that governs cities outside Vancouver won't happen this summer.

If there is a consensus among local governments at the Union of B.C. Municipalities convention this fall that a vacant residence tax is needed, the province will likely allow it, de Jong said. But he repeated his view that the best answer to rising home prices and a shortage of rental accommodation is to build more of them.

"Let us not make the mistake of assuming that government is going to tax our way out of the challenge people are facing when trying to buy a house," de Jong said.

NDP leader John Horgan said B.C.'s surplus is despite a slump in resource revenues, and instead is based on $200 million from increased Medical Services Plan premiums and a "massive increase" in property transfer taxes.

"And as we've seen in the past, blackjack, booze and bungalows is not a way to build a sustainable economy," Horgan said.

For 2015-16, the number of properties sold in B.C. jumped 18.6 per cent over the previous year, and the total value of sales was up 20.9 per cent.

The finance ministry estimates the total value of real estate sold in 2015-16 was $93.67 billion, with nearly $80 billion in residential properties and the rest commercial.

B.C. finished the fiscal year with economic growth of three per cent, more than triple the national average. Population rose and retail sales increased by six per cent.




Cheers



Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
hello,
buildings in montreal are too competitive. is there any other place in Quebec which could potentially grow in the next 10 years or so? are trois-riviere, drummville or shebrooke good places for building (12plex+) investment?
cheers

I was successful with 4 plex and 5 plex in Valleyfield


Good Luck




Cheers




Booker
 

BookerL

Gorgeous ladies Fanatic
Apr 29, 2014
5,805
6
0
Northern emisphere
Vancouver real estate sales fall but prices only inch downwards

Hello all








The number of homes sold in Greater Vancouver in December fell dramatically from last year's highs, according to the Greater Vancouver Real Estate Board, but prices are only inching down.

According to the latest numbers released by the board this morning, the number of homes sold in Greater Vancouver dropped more than 22 per cent in December compared to the previous month, and nearly 40 per cent when compared to last year.

The declining sales figures match trends reported in recent months.

But board president Dan Morrison says while market sales have been slowing since they peaked last March, prices have not dropped significantly.

"There is no question, in the last six months, prices have come off two or three per cent," he said, "But compared to a year ago, prices are still higher."

In fact, the benchmark price of all residential homes dropped only 2.2 per cent over the last six months and prices are still nearly 18 per cent higher compared to December 2015, according to today's numbers.

Assessment increases

The news comes as homeowners receive notices showing the BC Assessment values for most homes in the region rose sharply between July 2015 and July 2016.

"Increases of 30 to 50 per cent will be typical for single-family homes in Vancouver, North Shore, Squamish, Burnaby, Tri-Cities, Richmond and Surrey,
" said a notice issued by the provincial body last month. "Typical strata residential increases will be in the 15 to 30 per cent range."

That roughly matches the price increase of 38 per cent for the benchmark price of detached homes in Greater Vancouver calculated by the real estate board, for the same period.

Likewise, the real estate board calculated the benchmark price for apartments rose by 27 per cent from July to July, while townhomes rose 29 per cent, which matches the upper range from B.C. Assessment.

Limited supply keeping prices up

Morrison notes the real estate market in Metro Vancouver is still adapting to the introduction of several measures introduced after the timeframe of those assessments, including the 15 per cent foreign buyers tax — and it remains difficult to forecast where the market is heading.

"The long-term effect of these actions won't be fully understood for some time," he said. "Best guess is another two to three months to work things out."

Morrison also notes one of the key factors stopping prices from falling is that not many people are putting their homes up for sale.

"The supply of homes for sale couldn't keep up with the demand for much of 2016," said Morrison. "The inventory is not there."

The latest figures show the number of homes on the market continued to fall in Greater Vancouver, dropping 24 per cent to 6,345 from November 2016.

For new listings the drop is even more dramatic: a 58 per cent decline since November 2016.

"Vancouver is not a factory town. People are buying for the long term. Nobody is forced to sell," he notes.

While detached homes have shown the largest drop since November at 1.8 per cent, apartments fell only 0.3 per cent, while attached homes fell 0.8 per cent, the figures show.





Cheers





Booker
 
Toronto Escorts