In a thead in the Montreal massage section the following conversation started and evolved https://merb.cc/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=325399#post325399 . In order not to highjack that thread, with this question, I am posting here quotes of the pertinent intervention, I think the subject should interest many.
So what do you think?
A massage with HJ: prostitution? or massage therapy?
YouVantOption said:Huh? Some girls do more, some girls do less, but it is all prostitution. Penetration doesn`t make it any more so than a handjob.
apk said:I think there`s a line in there somewhere when "sex" plays an integral part in the session. If you were a virgin before you walked into Kama as opposed to PMC (and took the top option available at both places)... would your status have changed by the time you walked out?? MP and SP aren`t really the same (in my book).
YouVantOption said:I`m outing you! "I did not have sexual relations with that woman!" I knew Al Gore was in town, didn`t think his pal Bill was too.
Sure. I agree with you. However, say you drive the hot teen babysitter home and she takes out her tits and give you a hand-job. Your wife`s best friend walks by. Do you think it is gonna fly in divorce court that it ws `only` a hand-job? Or if there is a bust?
Of course sex plays an integral part of the session. I don`t find myself going to places offering men, or fugly women, too too often. I want a stone hottie to pull my pud for me, or hop on top if that`s what she`s into.
So what do you think?
A massage with HJ: prostitution? or massage therapy?
Last edited: