Isn't it funny given the fact the female gender generally reacts so unforgivingly to cheating men and the male lothario type, except to also use as sex pals or cheap bangs, that escort clients don't see the problem of just being in the hobby. How many times have we seen the escorts say that they could never forget the guy had paid them for sex.
Not getting your exact point here. However, to clarify my comment on Sarah Bernard's quote of "i am returning to my one only personnality". I've long held that SPs don't conscientiously develop dual personalities. It's a defense mechanism to allow them to deal with being an SP. Let's not get into moralites, mores, socialogical BS here. That could take hours. Most times the SPs aren't even aware of the transformation. I actually mentioned this to Sarah once. It's interesting and a tribute to the lady that "I THINK" she realized the affect. It's the only time I've heard an SP even come close to publicly acknowledging it.
The point is that sometimes when an SP is scamming a guy in a "goods/money for sex/companionship" scenario, they don't even realize it or can't admit it to themselves. Then comes the everyday question of, "What is Pay for Play?" Do women and men understand the line, or even agree on the line, between relationship vs. prostitution? I don't want to debate this point, as I really don't have a definition or judgment on the issue. What I want to convey is the "sliding scale", if you will, of human emotions vs. sex vs. money, etc....etc... So one person's definition of relationships, prostitution, sugerdaddy, etc....etc.. could be different from another's.
How does this relate to our principal subject here? Simple, ericmathew54's definition may be different from yours. The line can become blurry even in the best of circumstances. So, the response of "enjoy the ride" might be the best response.
