Dear Mister CUSTOMER.

[sigma69]

Some of the posts on this thread make me cringe...

I think that metoo4 and Mod 11 hit it righ on the nail. The women we deal with are not merchandise. They are human beings. As such, you have to deal with the entire package when you hire one: emotions, feelings, temperament, moods are part of what you hire.

If you actually hire and manage employees (or have done it), you know what I am talking about. Even the very best employees can have bad days, bad weeks, or a bad year even. In real life, dealing with someone you hire requires you to deal with the whole package.

I am not excusing bad, neglectful or inconsiderate service. Not at all.
BlondeBabe is not saying no reviews should be written. As a proud merbist, I want to read and write reviews. But there is a good way to say things and there is a bad way. Being considerate and respectful is the good way. I know SPs find too many reviews vulgar (some because of the acronyms, some because of the ratings, some both). Makes them reluctant to even log in to read the reviews - if they do not read the reviews, there is no "constructive criticism".

Finally, a note about costs. A couple of you mentionned that hiring a SP can be relatively costly. Valid point. But consider that, as in so many things, rarity creates value. Go to any serious art or collectable auction, and you will see this truth in action (rarity = value; more rare = even more value). What percentage of women out there would agree to let you touch their body in the ways the average SP does?? Question asked and answered, isn't it?

Buyer's remorse exists everywhere, especially when one is talking about high dollar investments. I've seen serious collectors regret paying very high prices for pieces that they find less than interesting. BUT the serious collector/hobbyist also knows that the occasional disappointment is more than compensated by the day-to-day pleasure associated with their hobby.

 

[Mod 11]

Ty! But seriously what I Wrote wasnt mean at all. I think Its just a funny way to tell that is not always a constructive way to talk about the girls. Sometimes you can give a girl a 6 for the body but someone else can give a 10. So why doing this If the girl is just not your type?

And I totally agree with you.

 

[RobinX]

...
It's sad that mens here can actually have the power to ruin someone reputation only because the connection wasnt there!
When I read something like
Face 8/10
Body 6/10
Attitude 5/10

Its totally makes me puke.
...
So please give us some respect, we just want to do our best and pay school.

I think that Blonde Babe has a very good point. Reviews are like performance appraisals. When writing reviews we need to be be sensitive to the fact that, unlike most of us who receive a performance appraisal maybe once or twice a year, SPs and MTs are subject to being reviewed every time they see a client. In addition, these reviews are anonymous and the reviewer can say pretty much say what he wants with impunity, and the MT or SP does not have much recourse to defend herself, even though such reviews may threaten her very livelihood. Under the cloak of anonymity, some people can be very vicious, seemingly in total disregard for the feelings of the SPs or MTs they are insulting. Those MTs and SPs who are able to stay in business probably have greater strength of character than most people, simply in order to be able to put up with this and a lot of the other crap that they have to deal with. Therefore, I think that, as clients, we need to be more sensitive to this, and we should cut them some slack.

Je pense que Blonde Babe a un très bon point. Un revue est similaire à une évaluation de performance. Lorsqu'on écrit un revue, on devrait être conscient du fait que, tandis que la plupart des gens recoivent une évaluation de leur performance une ou deux fois par an, des TDS pourront être évaluées dans un revue chaque fois qu'ils voient un client. Ces revues sont anonymes, et la personne qui écrit la revue pourra dire n'importe quoi en toute impunité, et la TDS n'a pas beaucoup de recours pour se défendre, même si ces revues peuvent menacer leur gagne-pain. Sous le couvert de l'anonymat, certaines personnes peuvent être très vicieux, au mépris total des sentiments de TDS qu'ils insultent. Les TDS qui ont reussi de continuer en affaires ont probablement une plus grande force de caractère que la plupart des gens, simplement pour être capable de faire face à ça et tout l'autre merde qu'ils devront se débrouiller avec chaque jour. Par conséquent, je pense que, en tant que clients, nous devrons être plus sensibles à cela, et nous devons leur donner une chance et un peu plus de respect.

 

[TheDon]

Every job has it's good points and bad points. If someone wants to make fast easy money that's undeclared then they have to take the bad that comes with it.

If a girl gets bad reviews then she's not trying hard enough to connect with the client and make them happy. There are girls that consistently get raving reviews and that's not by accident. It's because these girls understand the business they are in.

The numbers scale should be taken very subjectively when it deals with face, body, service, and attitude. Average to good numbers will vary from person to person. But when the numbers are very low you can't ignore that and it probably be the same for everyone.


The Don

 

[OnUrGspot]

make no mistake guys, we are reviewed as soon as she gets back in the car or waiting room. no slack is cut then. if she didn't like you, she might still see you because $100/hr is quite an incentive for her & her co-workers to tolerate you again, and again. all the while you're thinking girl likes you, since she's letting you repeat with her.

Couldn't have said it any better! This is the reality..wake up, guys!

This - $100 = Repeat = Again + Again

DA_

 

[kaydee1968]

Some of the posts on this thread make me cringe...

I think that metoo4 and Mod 11 hit it righ on the nail. The women we deal with are not merchandise. They are human beings. As such, you have to deal with the entire package when you hire one: emotions, feelings, temperament, moods are part of what you hire.

If you actually hire and manage employees (or have done it), you know what I am talking about. Even the very best employees can have bad days, bad weeks, or a bad year even. In real life, dealing with someone you hire requires you to deal with the whole package.

I am not excusing bad, neglectful or inconsiderate service. Not at all.
BlondeBabe is not saying no reviews should be written. As a proud merbist, I want to read and write reviews. But there is a good way to say things and there is a bad way. Being considerate and respectful is the good way. I know SPs find too many reviews vulgar (some because of the acronyms, some because of the ratings, some both). Makes them reluctant to even log in to read the reviews - if they do not read the reviews, there is no "constructive criticism".

Finally, a note about costs. A couple of you mentionned that hiring a SP can be relatively costly. Valid point. But consider that, as in so many things, rarity creates value. Go to any serious art or collectable auction, and you will see this truth in action (rarity = value; more rare = even more value). What percentage of women out there would agree to let you touch their body in the ways the average SP does?? Question asked and answered, isn't it?

Buyer's remorse exists everywhere, especially when one is talking about high dollar investments. I've seen serious collectors regret paying very high prices for pieces that they find less than interesting. BUT the serious collector/hobbyist also knows that the occasional disappointment is more than compensated by the day-to-day pleasure associated with their hobby.

There is a big difference when you hire someone full time, where you are in their presence for 40 hours a week, week after week, versus hiring an SP for an hour. When you meet with an SP for the 1st time, is it not somewhat like a job interview, where they should be delivering their very best, so you will "hire her", meaning you'll repeat with her? If an SP is in a bad mood, or is having an "off day", or is having her period, she shouldn't see clients. Perhaps her long standing repeat customers might put up with it, but someone new will not, and never repeat. And they may tell someone about it.

Yes, these women are people, and clients should respect them as they would any other person. But they are selling sex, to put it bluntly. Sex is the product. When they decide to pursue that profession, they need to accept that their body, service, and attitude are the product. It's like when I try a restaurant for the 1st time.....the food, service, and atmosphere is what I am paying for. Those 3 items better meet my expectations if they want me to return. If one of those items are off, I probably won't return. And I will probably tell my friend, and recommend they go, or not. I may decide to post in on a website.

It's just business, plain and simple. Word of mouth and reputation mean so much, if not everything.

 

[WalkingWallet]

I have to chime in on this one.

This "hobby" has two simple objectives: one side gets orgasm, the other side gets money.

How many times did you have "equipment malfunction" because girl failed to put even tiniest effort to make you feel desirable, or even welcome at all?

And whose problem was it that it did not go up? Always ours.

You go and say to girl - "I could not get it up 'cause you sent clear signals that I am repulsive to you, that you despise me. So I will not pay you."

You will get your balls cut off.

It's simple - we review to avoid getting a rotten deal. With reviews, I weed out "princesses", who despite their "innocence", and "naivety" know how to block a man, and get maximum pay for minimum service.

PS - to those who never had equipment malfunction, and could penetrate frozen horse in Siberian tundra - good for you. Go become a porn star.

 

[metoo4]

People are still coming back about buying a product. You are wrong, you buy a service. It is right the lady invest her body in the deal and her body is part of the service but, investing your body is way more personnal than investing your screwdriver and test gears.

You are not just buying any service, you are buying to enjoy a woman's body and have her to make you cum. This is far from calling a tech to fix your PC. You don't give a damn about your tech's looks. As long as he doesn't smell bad, isn't totally obnoxious and mainly know his job, all is good. When will you refuse access to a computer guy because you don't like his ass?

My opinion on numerical rating is at best I find them useless and at worst, I find them to be a lack of respect. Why? Who say I have the same scale as the person making the rating?

When you rate the computer guy above, it is easy, he know his job or he doesn't. Nobody can debates if the computer got fixed or not.

When rating a lady, everything is debatable.

Examples?

1- Some might say 10/10 on DFK because they love to have their throat licked and sucked. The next guy will say she's 3/10 because she almost ripped his tonsils off. Same experience, the lady did not change anything, only the perception changed. What positive criticism can anybody get out of this?
2- You read a review and the reviewer say body 10/10. You quickly book the girl, thinking it will be the woman of your dreams. Face to face, the lady is 6'11", huge rock-hard man-made EE, the clit the size of your dick, a voice deeper than any man you ever talked to, collagen lips and all. She basically paid a mansion to her plastic surgeon. This is not your type at all. You rate her -10/10. Again, same lady, same situation, only the perspective changed.

Now, let's see possible reviews:

1- The pissed-off guy who doesn't give a damn about respect and is just renting a hole to stick his dick in:
She looked like a man. She had so much plastic surgery she smelled like plastic. Her boobs were so hard I now have a bump on my head. Her clit was like a dick, I got confused and I put the condom on it instead.
Body: -10 (She spent so much on plastic she would be millionaire if she would be natural)
Sensuality: 2 (she was breathing)
Service: 0 (I ran away as fast as I can)
GFE style: 0 (I don't understand, she must be weird, even if I acted like a total jerk, she should have been nice to me, I'm paying.)
Repeat? Only if she pays me 100X what she wanted to charge me.

Sound funny? I've read reviews here and elsewhere that were pretty close to that! Any kind or respect here?

2- The guy who didn't enjoy but understand it's just about taste.
She was not my style at all. I prefer petite, delicate and natural woman. She is very tall (6'11) and had a lot of plastic surgeries done on her. Her breast are enhanced EE and are too hard for my taste. I will not repeat with her but it is likely some will appreciate her.

See the differences? The same info was provided except juicy details that could be deducted anyhow. The second review expressed a personal opinion (note the "not my style" and "for my taste" expressions?) and did not attack the lady, it only said things as they were, from the second guy's perspective. The first review implies (even if it's not explicitely mentionned) the lady is awful and nobody in his right mind could be attracted to such beast. The second review implies that, for that specific guy, it did not work.

 

[Ricky bonds]

Quote....
When I read something like*
Face 8/10
Body 6/10
Attitude 5/10"""
...
Actually this would encourage me to go see her...
Face...at 8 , she must be great for blowjobs..
Body.. One mans 6 is another mans 10... So it's good enough to have sex with..
And an attitude of 5 isn't too bad... I've only seen 3 perfect tens out of all the girls I've seen...
Usually they are 2's and 3's in the attitude department...besides, I don't go there to chat over tea..?
I want a pretty face?, and a nice body to matress wrestle with...
So a 5 is nothing to be worried about.

 

[sigma69]

Now, let's see possible reviews:

1- The pissed-off guy who doesn't give a damn about respect and is just renting a hole to stick his dick in:
She looked like a man. She had so much plastic surgery she smelled like plastic. Her boobs were so hard I now have a bump on my head. Her clit was like a dick, I got confused and I put the condom on it instead.
Body: -10 (She spent so much on plastic she would be millionaire if she would be natural)
Sensuality: 2 (she was breathing)
Service: 0 (I ran away as fast as I can)
GFE style: 0 (I don't understand, she must be weird, even if I acted like a total jerk, she should have been nice to me, I'm paying.)
Repeat? Only if she pays me 100X what she wanted to charge me.

Sound funny? I've read reviews here and elsewhere that were pretty close to that! Any kind or respect here?

2- The guy who didn't enjoy but understand it's just about taste.
She was not my style at all. I prefer petite, delicate and natural woman. She is very tall (6'11) and had a lot of plastic surgeries done on her. Her breast are enhanced EE and are too hard for my taste. I will not repeat with her but it is likely some will appreciate her.

See the differences? The same info was provided except juicy details that could be deducted anyhow. The second review expressed a personal opinion (note the "not my style" and "for my taste" expressions?) and did not attack the lady, it only said things as they were, from the second guy's perspective. The first review implies (even if it's not explicitely mentionned) the lady is awful and nobody in his right mind could be attracted to such beast. The second review implies that, for that specific guy, it did not work.

Very well said metoo4!
Any encounter involves 2 persons (unless we are talking duos) and chemistry between two personalities cannot be objectively predicted. There is always an element of dumb luck, and personality quirks always play a role.

I understand that many want to turn personal fantasies into real encounters (who wouldn't!! ). But reality always imposes its own twist on things. If a particular lady cannot fulfill all your fantasies, it is not *only* her fault, really. Maybe the way you select SPs does not work for you. Maybe using more back channels (PMs) to ask more pointed questions about SPs would work better.

Anyway, barring serious misconduct by a lady, your responsibility is to review her fairly and respectfully.

 

[yogi bear]

Perceptions, interpretations, and expectations.

We all have different motivations for doing what we do. BOTH SP's and hobbyists.
Personnally I like to take off my married man costume, and play the nice gentleman with money that cares about the girl ROLE. I think this role is acceptable for all SP's, and I expect them to play a role too: the girl that WANTS to make me feel good for an hour.

After the encounter, I don't expect her to be revulsed nor in love with me, I actually expect her to forget me and move on. I certainly will not let myself be affected by an encounter with a special girl nor a horrible one. One thing I do expect though: that she plays the role she describes in her adds, and that she looks the part too. If she doesn't, she will get a review that will state exactly that: She was a weak actress and or her description is a lie. An actress or SP that demands anywhere from 80$ to 250$ an hour MUST deliver up to that price. Now the question is: Who am I to rate an actress? I will probably base my review on other encounters and compare quality and experience with other SP's.

How can 2 actors faking a love scene in a movie be so great? 1- experience, 2- Repeat takes (hahaha) 3-chemistry 4- willingness to make it look real.

As I'm paying, I will try hard to look for chemistry points and adapt to my partner, because I am WILLING to make it feel real. I have experience with women and I will use it to read her body accordingly and try to encourage her in the right direction so that we both enjoy our roles.

2 Things I won't accept: repeating with an unwilling and or lying SP
I will repeat with and unexperienced girl that is willing and accurate in her descritpion and service offered

Having a bad day? don't take the role then. Pass on the offer, and make sure that if you accept meeting me, you will be on your game. We only have an hour to make it feel real and I don't care about the time before or after. I need you then and there.

What does make the deal one sided, is that someone is paying. If the hour was free, I would expect to send a picture, maybe have a few phone conversations, maybe dinner before she agrees that she can play the role for one hour. That would called dating and I have no time and no interest for it...

The SP accepts to get paid for a role, with a strange partner she's never seen before, and depending on her add, she needs to deliver what she advertised. If she can't, she should say so, apologize for the inconvenience and refuse to accept the hour contract.

Same goes for the paying actor/producer/director. If the promised actress' resumé is a lie, he should decline going further and no one should get worst for it.

The worst thing about the whole hour role business? The movie in my head lasts about 2 hours after the encounter is over before it becomes blurred and unreal, and all I have left is a pair of throbbing balls that smell like costco soap and a few dollars less in my pockets...

Then I put on my married man costume again and I feel great.

 

[Merlot]

Hello all,

Secondo,

It`s sad that mens here can actually have the power to ruin someone reputation only because the connection wasnt there!
When I read something like
Face 8/10
Body 6/10
Attitude 5/10

Its totally makes me puke.

True. But when can anyone be sure the ``connection factor`` was the reason. Just as there are many illegitimate reasons for giving a poor rating (such as a personal agenda), there are many legitimate reasons. The human variability factors in tastes, preferences, chemistry and just overall differences in approach to what a meeting should be makes it very difficult to set any standard value of assessment. That has a lot to do with why I just tell my story and don`t use numbers ratings. There is no defined standard that can make numbers work, besides all the other human variables.

when all is said and done , probably 8 times out of 10 , when the S P respects choice , time slot , time payed for , cleanliness of premises etc. and we the paying customer respect the S P and her limits , and treat them like we would like to be treated ; the sessions would be much appreciated and therefore make for repeat visits ,,,,,,,,,,,just my 2 cents

Agreed.

And i was worried about my french grammar...Miss ``whatever name you want`` this is a review site for clients about providers... ???? If we only praise, it becomes a promotion site. I am not sure if you know what kind of business you are in?Think for a minute, if we were perfect 10`s we would not be paying for you to put on an act.
We are the clients here,you are the product being sold...
Analogy with restaurant critic is pretty accurate,when i read a review on a restaurant in the paper,the cook,owner or waitress has no business making remarks on reviewer or clients clothes,taste,looks,home decor or else.
And why in hell would a product,a servant or anyone selling something be making remarks on a buyer/client family or personal life...None of their business...This is a CLIENT!!!...Not a boyfriend....

What you say about critiquing the client is generally true. But when a client critiques a product how do we know when the client is really up to it, I mean having the qualities to appreciate the product for it`s true value and the quality it is designed for? It only takes the right amount of money to buy a Ferrari, not the knowledge and/or skill to appreciate it`s technological beauty or it`s performance potential. In the same way anyone who has the money can call for an SP who provides high quality GFE service, but if the client is an uncouth filthy slob who just wants to stick it in and get off then how can he appreciate and rate a quality GFE...or any decent escort whose service skills and potential qualities are much better than the clients maximum standards for ``service``.

BTW...the ladies are people...human beings...NOT PRODUCTS!

Secondly, how to you feel about the multitude of providers who advertise with false pictures? Or with false ages? Or with false weights? Or just simply provide bad service? Who don`t properly bathe? Etc.....?

Each side of these business transactions has its deceptions and faults. False or misleading advertising by business; slovenly, demanding, undesirable, clients with unreasonable expectations.

When penetrating this industry as a provider, you’ve signed moral contract to yourself that you’re taking a complete package. Along with the good pay, comes with respectful or disrespectful clients, clean or smelly, obese or slim, generous or non-generous, thus good or bad. You have the moral obligation to conduct yourself and provide the best service to all aforementioned client categories. Reviews, whether negative or positive will be there and will not going to disappear. Why? The industry price tag that comes with this kind of service calls for reading reviews before buying such service.

Note: Mauritius...these comments are general, not a specific criticism of your post. You wrote a good post.

Again I hate this characterization of escorts as products. It would be very interesting to see what would happen if guys honestly told the lady who arrives to fulfill his desires that he expects her to act exactly like a ``PRODUCT``...like a machine??? Either he would be very unhappy with the type of service that kind of attitude would generate, or he would see a lot of escorts exiting as soon as she was informed about this view. [SIZE=``3``]Remember, if you want to think this way then when we get hired we are all products to some extent. Are you who prefer to demand so much of escorts as products willing to put so much of yourself on the line for you employer as their product as you demand of escorts...with the same total lack of job benefits other than pay?????????? [/SIZE]

However, regarding the statement above, it`s true that practicing this hobby means a wide range range of good and bad issues on both sides of the business.

This brings us to the famous GFE experience: Providing aspects of social and physical interaction beyond the act itself, Passion, Cuddling, no rush also DFK, , BLS, DT, CIM, Pearls, COB, CIF Russian, DATY, Rimjob, Digits, FS, MSOG, Greek .

I think that the real problem in the industry is the definition of the GFE experience and the expectations that the customer has. The SP`s all seem to have a different take on the GFE. That is the main reason that there is such a number of bad reviews.

OhYesOui, interesting post in full. But the real problem is there is no specifically agreed standard for GFE. I doubt that the majority of recently married people who are passionately physical, or even extremely sexual single couples who feel sexually satisfied receive all of these acronym services. When it comes to what many hobbyists think GFE should be, it`s either wishful thinking, a device of expectation for leverage to pressure escorts, or a case of pornstar envy. I know many couples and have had my own experiences where being happy with a significant other has not including all of these services. So why should escorts live up to the more demanding standards many cannot or did not get from many girlfriends or wives???

Guys, you have to remember: these girls are HUMAN BEING and they don`t offer you a hamburger, they offer you THEIR BODY. Nobody is complaining about the fact there are bad reviews posted, it`s about how the reviews are posted that seems to be the issue.

There are ways to report bad experiences without hurting the person you are talking about. Just think exactly like she`s saying: how would you like to be reviewed? Yes, we customers are paying but, in my opinion, we don`t have to leave all sensitivity at the door when writing the review. That`s when it becomes ``positive criticism``.

Actually you sensitive, compassionate, wonderful big guy...they offer you their entire BEING...their SOUL, so to speak. I doubt that any escort has ever put ``all of herself`` out there in an encounter, but how can such intimacy not touch at least a little bit of every part of her being no matter how she tries to keep from being that vulnerable. In that case how can anyone ever call a human being or infer anyone is a ``product``. Just because the condition that brings escorts and clients together is a business transaction how can any hobbyist be so coldly calculating and insensitive...inhuman in fact, to demand the escorts be a product or serve like a machine. And yet the same hobbyists who think like this are hypocritically angry when an escort does behave like the cold product they think escorts are.

by inflating our ratings?

according to the vast majority i am a harsh grader. according to me, i am not. so read between the lines the same way you would when you read a reviewer who hands out 10`s w/ impunity. i will not pander to the masses by being dishonest to myself. who are we writing these reviews for anyhow? it`s a review of her, not an advertisement for her.

Yes, sensitivity should not mean diluting the truth. But there are decent ways to give reviews that keep the truth fully intact.

make no mistake guys, we are reviewed as soon as she gets back in the car or waiting room. no slack is cut then.

But, in contrast to the point of this thread there is no public written review identifying or criticizing you. The ironic reality is our real girlfriends or wives have undoubtedly made jokes or shared something embarrassing about us with their friends that they have chuckled at no matter how much they like or love us.

wow...if i can write reviews about clients... it would be a whole book!!! ...id love to write EVERYTHING about all clients...

In the past I have suggested a thread where only escorts would write reviews about clients with ban on names, place, time, and identifying physical details to keep the person being reviewed anonymous. The client reviews would just give a general view about attitudes, hygiene, behavior, and any other notable experiences. No hobbyists would be allowed to post anything in such a thread. It would make many guys rethink their attitudes and often be an entertaining laugh riot for us.

Good hobbying,

Merlot

 

[sigma69]

There is a big difference when you hire someone full time, where you are in their presence for 40 hours a week, week after week, versus hiring an SP for an hour. When you meet with an SP for the 1st time, is it not somewhat like a job interview, where they should be delivering their very best, so you will "hire her", meaning you'll repeat with her? If an SP is in a bad mood, or is having an "off day", or is having her period, she shouldn't see clients. Perhaps her long standing repeat customers might put up with it, but someone new will not, and never repeat. And they may tell someone about it.

I dunno. Unless you contract with an independent, you are not really hiring the SP. You are hiring the agency to supply you with an SP. And this is not just a matter a semantics.

The client only sees his encounter. Naturally. But for the SP, she might have seen 2-3-4 clients before. For her, it's a job - a very special job, but still it's work. The agency puts pressure on ladies to be available as often as possible. And agencies will expect their ladies to stick to a pre-established schedule. With the growing trend in pre-bookings, ladies are put in a position where changing their minds at the last minute gets negative pushback from the clients and agencies. Plus, not trivially, she probably needs the income and that in itself is pressure.

So, if an encounter is less than satisfactory, maybe your beef is more with the agency (or the way the industry works) and not so much with the SP...?

But really, if you look at the various reviews here, you see that most SPs perform famously most of the time, and with most of their customers. Us, Merbists/Montrealers, are lucky guys.

 

[BlondeBabe]

Okay,so i will be paid by you and wait for your review...You gals are completely out of line:You are the "GOODS" I am the "CUSTOMER".If you don't want to be reviewed don't sell your performance.
In french: "Au theatre le public peut critiquer,huer ou applaudir,c'est un droit qu'il achete en entrant"

And You perfectly right. But theres a way to do It.

Tu as pas à Jeter des tomates sur le stage parce que l'actrice ne te plait pas, juste expliquer gentillement ce qu'elle aurait pu amiliorer c'est bien suffisant.

 

[Bucky]

Personnellement je n'ai jamais donné de note quand je faisais une review d'une fille, merde c'est pas les olympiques je trouve ca dégradant. Je donnais mes impressions, l'acceuil, hygiène, physique etc, mais en revanche je comprends les gars qui cherchent la meilleure rencontre après tout c'est un loisir assez dispendieux et tu veux en avoir pour ton argent..mais chacun ses goûts, pour moi une fille peut être très belle, pour un autre tout a fait ordinaire. BlondeBabe, si le client te plait pas, je crois que tu as le droit de refuser la rencontre, moi je suis obèse et c'est pour ca que je paye pour avoir un contact physique, c'est la seule facon que je peux en avoir. Alors je m,attends a être respecté moi aussi et ne pas aller te fendre la gueule avec tes copines a propos de mon aspect ou de la grandeur de mon pénis. J'aimerais bcp plus me faire dire non que d'avoir une rencontre ordinaire et dépenser des centaines de dollars pour rien. BTW tu peux demander a ne pas avoir de review sur le site.

 

[Aeolus]

If you want to wrote shit like that maybe all the masseuse can do actually the same for their customers! Dont u think that would be nice?

Let's be real. Most of us are already well aware that we're not god's gift. Otherwise, the majority of us wouldn't be paying for sex in the first place. Such reviews wouldn't tell most of us anything that we don't already know.

My opinion on numerical rating is at best I find them useless and at worst, I find them to be a lack of respect. Why? Who say I have the same scale as the person making the rating?

I agree that there is a nice way to give a bad review in most cases. I don't use the numerical scale in written reviews.

Yes, these women are people, and clients should respect them as they would any other person. But they are selling sex, to put it bluntly. Sex is the product. When they decide to pursue that profession, they need to accept that their body, service, and attitude are the product. It's like when I try a restaurant for the 1st time.....the food, service, and atmosphere is what I am paying for. Those 3 items better meet my expectations if they want me to return. If one of those items are off, I probably won't return. And I will probably tell my friend, and recommend they go, or not. I may decide to post in on a website.

This says it all.

make no mistake guys, we are reviewed as soon as she gets back in the car or waiting room. no slack is cut then.

Good point. A bad review might also mean that the girls she told will refuse to see you. I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if SP#2 or SP#3 one evening didn't show-up because SP#1 told them that I took too long and have a large tool.

 

[Kermit the Frog]

I would suspect that she would have no complaints if the reviews were favorable.

 

[BlondeBabe]

I would suspect that she would have no complaints if the reviews were favorable.

I have a lot of good, few bad. But I wasnt talking about my reviews... I was just surfing. who knows, maybe i'm not an escort at all... maybe i'm a guy too... maybe I'm working for a study here....

Who knows....

 

[Howards Johnson]

I have met several MPs that told me that they do not approve of the idea of a review board because they feel the reviews do not tell the truth about them and all it takes is one angry customer to ruin them.

 

[hungry101]

I know Blondebabe wasn't talking about me because one of the Eleganza girls told me "You have the perfect size cock" and offered free anal! But I will weigh in anyway. Blondebabe, When you meet a hobbyist for a a session you enter into an implied contract. You promise to provide a service for a fee. Now it is up to the hobbyist to live up to our end of the contract. We provide a good, clean, safe work environment. I am always as clean and as fresh as possible and not so drunk that I cannot perform. I promise not be ill or have some open scab etc. or anything like this. Also, I typically choose to go the extra mile and provide food or drink in an upscale hotel etc etc. The point is there is an implied contract that both sides enter into when a meeting with an SP is arranged.

I will rate myself

Hobbyist paid the agreed upon rate - 10
Hobbyist was not too high, or full of spirits to perform - 10
Hobbyist was washed and showered and gargled with mouthwash prior to date -9-10
Hobbyist wore clean underware and well groomed - 9
Hobbyist Treats the girls with respect and offers food and drink - 9-10
Hobbyist allows the girl to enter the room and acclimate herself prior to "pouncing" on her - 10
Hobbyist Great kisser - 10 (at least I think so)
Hobbyist is a Good looking guy that is fit and trim and doesnt need a service to get laid - 3

Don't worry Blondebabe. I never pay attention to just one bad review. I look for patterns of poor service. I think others do as well. But when you provide a service you get reviewed. This is the way it works. Get used to it or get out of the business.