Ce sont les processus officiel du gouvernement, quand est-ce que nous avons vu des actions concrètes suite à leur rapport. Leur vérification n'empêche pas les dépenses ridicules futures
Does Canada need a DOGE?
- Thread starter Mandouke
- Start date
Ce sont les processus officiel du gouvernement, quand est-ce que nous avons vu des actions concrètes suite à leur rapport. Leur vérification n'empêche pas les dépenses ridicules futures
Ce sont des organismes indépendants, contrairement à ce que tu prétends. Le Directeur Parlementaire du Budget a souvent prévenu que le gouvernement ne rencontrerait pas ses cibles. Cependant, la décision finale incombe au Gouvernement. C'est lui qui est élu. Ces organisme font rapport au Parlement (ensemble des élus) et non au Gouvernement (le parti au pouvoir).
Parlant de dépenses inutiles non censurées par le DOGE de Trump. Trump est allé au Super Bowl et en fin de semaine au Daytona 500 pour faire un show de boucane. Imaginez les coûts en sécurité pour quelqu'un qui prétend couper dans l'inutile. Un gros show de boucane pour les imbéciles.
Not attacking the messenger but rather pointing out its ideation and inherent bias. And yes it's Pipes. Please spare me your righteous indignation for my auto correct faux pas. Now that we have out of the way, it's important to note that trump/musk freeze on foreign assistance has threatened programs intended to counter al-shabab bombmakers, contain the spread of al qaeda across west Africa, and secure Islamic state prisoners in the middle east.
...et tout ça en seulement un mois....imagine 4 ans!!!!!.....lollll.....pas mal plus prioritaire que le coût des oeufs/ grocerie.......relol.
Ça fait quand même 9 ans qu'on subit ça... Un petit concert de Taylor Swift, la Jamaïque, etc...
En autant que le ' Doge Canadien ', s'il y a, arrête les dépenses pour des tampons et serviettes sanitaire dans les toilettes des hommes.
Je me demande ce que le vérificateur général va dire de ça .... ? Je n'ai rien vu la dessus encor!
C'est tout ce que tu as à rapporter??? Pas fort! Retourne lire les insanité de Pierre Rabbit Hair.
Seriously? This is opinion, not fact, from far right extremist Daniel Greenfield who considers liberals to be the enemy of America. That's the guy whose opinion you want us to believe, huh?I guess I need to issue a correction as well. It is apparently billions of dollars that USAID channeled to all kinds of terrorist entities, not millions as I first stated. Mea culpa.
How USAID funded terror states which killed US soldiers
USAID sent $9.3B to Islamic terror states that killed 3,000 American soldiers. And over $18 billion to Islamic terrorist states. Op-ed.www.israelnationalnews.com
This scandal affects about a dozen or more schools and it is the implementation of Islamic supremacist teachings in schools; that are supposed to be secular.
This has been happening at an increasing rate for numerous years and little action has been taken the problem has spread to other schools.
Much more needs to be done and there must be financial and criminal accountability.
I am sure it has deep ramifications but was more focused on the small issue of us still paying these teachers full salary and benefits. Talk about waste! Schools are broke…
If they are paying these lunatics, imagine what other waste is happening
Envoies moi des liens de ces insanitéa et il me fera plaisir de les lire
I'm sorry, but those of you who think that DOGE is about eliminating wasteful government spending are being fooled by Trump and Musk.
Trump and Musk know that by eliminating funding they can:
- kill government programs that don't fit their political agendas (foreign aid, DEI programs, immigration programs)
- protect the rich and powerful and their corporations (eliminate consumer protection agencies, environmental protection agencies)
- target their enemies (FDA investigation into Elon Musk's Neuralink company)
Other than the above, the only 'fat' that they want to eliminate are for useful government programs that serve working Americans, and have no usefulness for their rich buddies.
A rich person does not need:
- subsidies for farmers (Department of agriculture)
- housing subsidies (Federal Housing Administration)
- programs to rebuild after natural disasters (FEMA)
- programs for ex-military personnel (Veteran's Affairs)
DOGE its so-called elimination of wasteful spending are just an excuse for Trump to exercise executive overreach, cutting government agencies and programs, without calling it that.
Please, use your brain and dig deeper, instead of just swallowing up whatever rotten dish you are being served.
Full list of government agencies and program being targetted by DOGE here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Government_Efficiency#Actions_within_federal_government
Trump and Musk know that by eliminating funding they can:
- kill government programs that don't fit their political agendas (foreign aid, DEI programs, immigration programs)
- protect the rich and powerful and their corporations (eliminate consumer protection agencies, environmental protection agencies)
- target their enemies (FDA investigation into Elon Musk's Neuralink company)
Other than the above, the only 'fat' that they want to eliminate are for useful government programs that serve working Americans, and have no usefulness for their rich buddies.
A rich person does not need:
- subsidies for farmers (Department of agriculture)
- housing subsidies (Federal Housing Administration)
- programs to rebuild after natural disasters (FEMA)
- programs for ex-military personnel (Veteran's Affairs)
DOGE its so-called elimination of wasteful spending are just an excuse for Trump to exercise executive overreach, cutting government agencies and programs, without calling it that.
Please, use your brain and dig deeper, instead of just swallowing up whatever rotten dish you are being served.
Full list of government agencies and program being targetted by DOGE here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Government_Efficiency#Actions_within_federal_government
DOGE has the objective of eliminating $2 Trillion of wasteful spending.
Assuming that this is achievable, what do you think the federal government under Trump will do with the savings?
Option A- They will reinvest it in useful programs for Americans, such as making healthcare free for all (currently average cost is USD $14,570 per year for those who can afford it), reducing the cost of university education (USD $108,584 at a public school for a 4-year degree), introduce programs for parents to take parental leave, invest in housing infrastructure to reduce the cost of housing, ...?
Option B- They will reduce income taxes for average income working Americans
Option C- They will reduce income taxes for corporations and the 1% richest Americans
I know the answer, but I let you guys give your opinion...
Assuming that this is achievable, what do you think the federal government under Trump will do with the savings?
Option A- They will reinvest it in useful programs for Americans, such as making healthcare free for all (currently average cost is USD $14,570 per year for those who can afford it), reducing the cost of university education (USD $108,584 at a public school for a 4-year degree), introduce programs for parents to take parental leave, invest in housing infrastructure to reduce the cost of housing, ...?
Option B- They will reduce income taxes for average income working Americans
Option C- They will reduce income taxes for corporations and the 1% richest Americans
I know the answer, but I let you guys give your opinion...
Daniel Greenfield, an ace investigative reporter, has another illuminating piece on USAID (RIP) and its humanitarian activities.
www.gatestoneinstitute.org
How USAID Shipped Bags of Hundred Dollar Bills to the Taliban
[T]he ultimate responsibility lay with USAID. The $40 million on the tarmac was part of a much larger scheme under which USAID and the State Department provided over $1.7 billion in funding to the UN, which then shipped $2.9 billion in cash to
Here is my Doge Canada:
Don't even need to be Elon Musk to Doge Canada.
Doge Canada 200 million
300 million???
2019 "The federal government has invested $300 million for women in the developing world as part of the so-called Equality Fund."
Canada climate finance for developing countries.
Canada is officially a "Tax Farm"
Billions into so much crap.
All that money I have yet to see any new SNOWBLOWERS to speed up the snow removal.
Climate Change Sustainability Emergency billions of dollars and no new SNOWBLOWERS for Climate Change snowstorm.
Sustainability hypocrisy right in our faces.
Don't even need to be Elon Musk to Doge Canada.
Doge Canada 200 million
300 million???
2019 "The federal government has invested $300 million for women in the developing world as part of the so-called Equality Fund."
Canada climate finance for developing countries.
Canada is officially a "Tax Farm"
Billions into so much crap.
All that money I have yet to see any new SNOWBLOWERS to speed up the snow removal.
Climate Change Sustainability Emergency billions of dollars and no new SNOWBLOWERS for Climate Change snowstorm.
Sustainability hypocrisy right in our faces.
The risk of diversion of foreign aid to wartorn countries has been a problem for decades. The only way to stop it is to stop the flow of aid that would lead to disastrous consequences for the people in those countries. You don't shut down an entire humanitarian agency because of diversion of aid in one country. Rather you try to find solutions to that problem.Daniel Greenfield, an ace investigative reporter, has another illuminating piece on USAID (RIP) and its humanitarian activities.
How USAID Shipped Bags of Hundred Dollar Bills to the Taliban
[T]he ultimate responsibility lay with USAID. The $40 million on the tarmac was part of a much larger scheme under which USAID and the State Department provided over $1.7 billion in funding to the UN, which then shipped $2.9 billion in cash to
While I like that idea, it is probable to become corrupted like everything else. Nothing will change until serious consequences are levied and penalties paid for past corruption in government.
Once a precedent is set and people know there is serious jail time for their corruption, only then will things change.
It is an interesting premise, but here I believe it is not as simple as implementing measures to regulate our spending. It would be, if there was some intention of investing our money properly. It is just clear that in the last few years, there is none.
A recent example, when the government gives billions of dollars to Telesat Lightspeed —a company with ZERO satellites in orbit and no plan until 2026— to provide internet for all canadians, but the contract specifies that there will be no penalties if they fail, it is clear that they are not looking out for the best of our interests.
That is just one of many similar contracts signed by our government. But hey, at least our money is spent here, isn't?.
It is not like they are sending money overseas for programs that do not benefit us at all... oh wait, yes, they also do that...
A recent example, when the government gives billions of dollars to Telesat Lightspeed —a company with ZERO satellites in orbit and no plan until 2026— to provide internet for all canadians, but the contract specifies that there will be no penalties if they fail, it is clear that they are not looking out for the best of our interests.
That is just one of many similar contracts signed by our government. But hey, at least our money is spent here, isn't?.
It is not like they are sending money overseas for programs that do not benefit us at all... oh wait, yes, they also do that...
Similar threads
